Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  idiolekt Marcina Bielskiego
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

„Zawżdy usty śpiewali”, czyli o muzyce wokalnej w Kronice, to jest historyi świata Marcina Bielskiego (1564)

100%
Kozaryn D.
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica
|
2022
|
issue 17
132-144
EN
The article describes how to present vocal music in the most complete edition of Kronika of Marcin Bielski (1564). The view of the linguistic formation of this fragment of reality in an idiolectic approach from the 16th century confirms the use of several groups of words to describe this part of music that Bielski considers singing: the names of the melodic process of producing sound (śpiewać, odśpiewawać, przyśpiewawać, śpiewanie), what is sung (antyfona, cantica, gradał, hymn/hymna, kantyki, pienie, pieśń, proza, psalm, psałterz, responsyja, śpiewanie, żołtarz) and singers (psalterzysta, śpiewaczka, śpiewak). The conducted analyzes showed some features of Bielski’s lexical and research workshop and confirmed that his work is the beginning of perfecting the Polish language in many areas of its functioning.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O czym nie napisał Marcin Bielski, czyli o pewnym rodzaju uwag metatekstowych w Kronice, to jest historyi świata (1564)

100%
Kozaryn D.
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica
|
2020
|
issue 15
145-153
EN
The article discusses a selected group of metatextual comments made in the 3rd edition of Marcin Bielski’s Kronika published in 1564. The analysis focuses on those referring to the contents of his Chronicle, i.e. the comments informing about what Bielski has already written and where he has written it, what he is about to mention, what and for what reason has been omitted or added by the author when compared to his sources, and what he has only treated superficially. A review of the variety of the linguistic methods used for constructing these metatextual comments allows for disclosing the possible motivations behind the writer’s choices: his wish to direct the reading process and to lead the reader into assuming that the presented content is credible and accurate, combined with an educational and moralistic drive.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.