Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  illegal evidence
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The changes in the broadly conceived criminal procedure which were introduced in recent years refer to the problems which are crucial from the perspective of the protection of human rights, such as the scope of the authority of the services due to operational control which is conducted secretly, the model of the functioning of the public prosecution service or the unlawful acquiring of evidence in a criminal procedure. The evaluation of these changes, conducted by the Ombudsman from the point of view of the constitutional standards of the protection of the rights of the individual is not positive. The new regulations reduce the quality of these standards and they do not contain sufficient guarantees of protection against the arbitrariness of the activities engaged in these terms by the organs of public authority. This phenomenon imposes a particular duty on the courts – which hear criminal cases – to see that the final decision in a criminal case respects the universal standards of the protection of human rights.
PL
Pojmowanie Konstytucji jako podstawowego aktu normatywnego systemu prawnego skłania do poszukiwania w niej odpowiedzi nawet na najtrudniejsze pytania. Jednym z nich jest problem statusu dowodów nielegalnych, których stosowanie choć ułatwiać może prowadzenie postępowań sądowych budzi wątpliwości z perspektywy zasad konstytucyjnych. Dlatego też zadaniem niniejszej pracy jest próba ustalenia statusu takich dowodów z perspektywy art. 51 ust. 4 Konstytucji przy uwzględnieniu teoretycznoprawnego rozróżnienia norm kształtujących reguły formalizacji i konwencjonalizacji czynności dowodowych.
EN
Understanding the Constitution as the essential act of a legal system prompts us to seek answers to even the most difficult questions in it. One of them is the problem of the status of illegal evidence, the use of which, although facilitating court proceedings, raises doubts from the perspective of constitutional principles. Therefore, this study’s task is to establish the status of such evidence from the perspective of Art. 51.4 of the Constitution, taking into account the theoretical and legal distinction between norms shaping the rules of formalization and conventionalization of evidence activities.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.