Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  inclusive growth
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The aim of the article is to discuss the innovation policies implemented in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico, which promote innovativeness of enterprises. It is claimed that the innovation policies in those countries should increasingly contribute to the so-called inclusive growth, which may be achieved by supporting the innovativeness of enterprises, SMEs in particular, as well as through the greater mobilisation of these entities to become actively involved in the promotion of innovation.Its promotion is considered to be the key course of action to boost the economic growth in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. The innovation policy should account for the aspect of inclusiveness and should be strongly focused on the structural modifications of national innovation systems in the discussed countries, with priority support for enterprises, including both small and medium ones as well as their capabilities to create innovations and absorb them.
EN
This paper examines the role of international trade for economic prosperity in Pacific island countries (PICs), discusses their comparative advantage, and explores the potential for trade, and tourism in particular, to serve as a locomotive for inclusive economic growth. We find the trade performance in PICs has been generally weak over the past decade, with the exception of resource-rich countries. Small country size and remoteness from global economic centers may have contributed to this relatively poor performance. Using the gravity models to analyze the determinants of merchandise trade and tourism in PICs, we find tourism in these countries faces more favorable conditions for growth than goods exports. Further, we place our analysis in the context of the eastward shift of global economic gravity, focusing on emerging Asia as a source of demand for resource-based goods and services. We argue that the emergence of Asia as a dynamic global economic region presents PICs with an unprecedented opportunity to develop trade, particularly tourism, although traditional markets will remain important for a long time to come. Moreover, if stronger synergies can be established between tourism, agriculture, and fisheries, Pacific island countries stand a better chance to improve broad-based growth.
EN
This study has investigated the relationship between government spending and inclusive growth in Nigeria over the period 1995 to 2014. Specifically, it examined how, and to what extent, government spending on education, government spending on health, economic freedom, public resource use, and real GDP growth rate have impacted on inclusive growth in the country. It used the Dickey-Fuller GLS unit root test to ascertain the order of integration of the series. Consequently, through the Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bound testing technique, the study found that in the long-run government spending on health, economic freedom, public resource use and real GDP growth rate had significantly positive influence on inclusive growth. In the short-run, however, only real GDP impacted significantly on inclusive growth while other variables were not significant in causing inclusive growth. Thus, in conclusion, government spending in the form of redistributive spending on health propelled inclusive growth in Nigeria.
EN
The aim of the paper is to examine the diversity among the EU countries in the context of inclusive development. The hypothesis states that there is a significant disparity between old and new member states. The paper contains a brief look at the key definitions connected with inclusive development, a review of its measures, and the results of the research based on the Inclusive Development Index (IDI) provided by the World Economic Forum. The research was conducted for 29 countries (the EU without Cyprus and Malta, and additionally Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland), on the basis of data published in 2018, and with the usage of cluster analysis. The main conclusion is that there is a significant difference on the minus side between new entrants and Western and Northern Europe, and on plus as regards Southern Europe.
PL
Celem artykułu jest sprawdzenie zróżnicowania pomiędzy krajami Unii Europejskiej pod względem rozwoju inkluzywnego. Za hipotezę przyjęto stwierdzenie, że istnieje znaczna różnica pomiędzy starą i nową UE. Artykuł zawiera przegląd pojęć związanych z rozwojem inkluzywnym, propozycje pomiaru oraz wyniki badania z wykorzystaniem Indeksu Rozwoju Inkluzywnego opracowanego przez Światowe Forum Ekonomiczne. Badanie zostało przeprowadzone dla 29 krajów (UE bez Cypru i Malty oraz dodatkowo Norwegia, Islandia i Szwajcaria) z użyciem analizy skupień dla danych opublikowanych w 2018 r. Z badania wynika, że dla nowych krajów członkowskich istnieje różnica na minus w stosunku do Europy Zachodniej i Północnej oraz na plus w stosunku do Europy Południowej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.