Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  inquisitive semantics
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Question Meaning = Resolution Conditions

100%
Ciardelli I.
Logic and Logical Philosophy
|
2017
|
vol. 26
|
issue 3 Special Issue on Question Processing. Guest Editors: Mariusz Urbański, Michiel van Lambalgen, and Marcin Koszowy
383–416
EN
Traditional approaches to the semantics of questions analyze questions indirectly, via the notion of an answer. In recent work on inquisitive semantics, a different perspective is taken: the meaning of a question is equated with its resolution conditions, just like the meaning of a statement is traditionally equated with its truth-conditions. In this paper I argue that this proposal improves on previous approaches, combining the formal elegance and explanatory power of Groenendijk and Stokhof’s partition theory with the greater generality afforded by answer-set theories.
2

Question dependency in terms of compliance and erotetic implication

75%
Łupkowski P.
Logic and Logical Philosophy
|
2015
|
vol. 24
|
issue 3
357–376
EN
The dependency relation between questions is discussed in terms of compliance (developed within inquisitive semantics – INQ) and erotetic implication (developed within Inferential Erotetic Logic – IEL). I show that INQ approach to questions’ dependency is more narrow and strict than the one offered by IEL.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.