Search results

1

Topicality of John Paul II’s Pedagogical Message

100%

Rynio A.

The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II

|

2012

|

vol. 2

|

issue 1

PL

The purpose of this study is to outline the sources and aspects of the time- surpassing topicality of the Pope’s vision of integral education apparent in his anthropological, permeated with faith, reflection on man. In his vision, the internal perception conditions the integral education of man. The research confirms the thesis that the Pope’s pedagogy assumes an “adequate anthropology” and opens the human heart to the objective order of truth, including truth about Christ as “the centre of the universe and of history” (Redemptor hominis, 1) and to the fundamental truth about man. The Pope’s pedagogy with its anthropological grounding is topical due to the fact that it offers, contemporary times permitting, a complete vision of human education. This vision goes against the culture of lost faith, dehumanisation, nihilism, and existential cynicism, and also against axiological relativism. In this vision, science, technology, art, peace, justice, God, true religion, nature, grace, faith, hope and love are not in complementary distribution, but complement each other. The timeless source of the topical quality of the Pope’s pedagogical message appears to reside in the compatibility and completeness of the human image it provides. It investigates the complex matter of education and the individual story of shaping personalities of outstanding individuals. With due respect and unanticipated amazement, it also provides an outline of the Catholic interpretation of education and the human condition.

2

„Człowiek totalny” versus „człowiek integralny”. Przyczynek do Karola Marksa i Iwana Kkiriejewskiego rozważań o człowieku

100%

Kroczak J.

Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris

|

2018

|

vol. 40

|

issue 1

39-56

EN

The aim of this paper is to compare views on human nature as held by Karl Marx and Ivan Kireevsky. Despite the fact that Marx and Kireevsky expounded two totally different philosophical world views (such as slavophilia and dialectical materialism), both can be described as socialists: one scientific, the other utopian or religious one. In this regard, it turns out that some elements of their concepts of a human being are rather common. Both of them thought that man achieves his “completeness” or “integrality” in community, not by exclusively private efforts. Kireevsky envisioned his community as an Orthodox commune, while Marx his as a classless society. Analysis shows that both anthropological concepts were more reflecting of their utopian visions than any working social model.

3

Philosophy of Religion through Two Lenses: Charles Hartshorne Reads Semen Frank

100%

Obolevitch T.

Roczniki Filozoficzne

|

2023

|

vol. 71

|

issue 2

109-127

PL

Artykuł zawiera analizę porównawczą myśli rosyjskiego emigracyjnego filozofia Siemiona Franka i jednego z najwybitniejszych przedstawicieli filozofii i teologii procesu Charlesa Hartshorne’a. Wśród punktów zbieżnych wskazano na ich integralną wizję rzeczywistości. Rozważono podejście Franka i Hartshorne’a w kwestii poznania Boga, szczególną uwagę poświęcając ich interpretacji dowodu ontologicznego. Hartshorne był zaznajomiony z myślą rosyjską i nawet napisał recenzje na klasyczne książki Zieńkowskiego i Łosskiego na temat historii filozofii rosyjskiej, gdzie niejednokrotnie wspominał o Franku. Nie można mówić o wpływach obydwóch myślicieli na siebie, ale raczej o wspólnym dziedzictwie filozoficznym sięgającym Platona.

EN

The article contains a comparative analysis of the thought of Russian émigré philosopher Semen Frank and one of the most prominent representatives of process philosophy and theology Charles Hartshorne. Among the points of convergence, their integral vision of reality was pointed out. Frank’s and Hartshorne’s approaches to the question of cognition of God were considered, with special attention paid to their interpretation of the ontological proof. Hartshorne was familiar with Russian thought and even wrote reviews on Zenkovsky and Lossky’s classic books on the history of Russian philosophy, where he mentioned Frank more than once. One cannot speak of the two thinkers’ influence on each other, but rather of a common philosophical heritage going back to Plato.

Refine search results

1 Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris

1 Roczniki Filozoficzne

1 The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II

1 Kroczak J.

1 Obolevitch T.

1 Rynio A.

1 2023

1 2018

1 2012

Topicality of John Paul II’s Pedagogical Message

„Człowiek totalny” versus „człowiek integralny”. Przyczynek do Karola Marksa i Iwana Kkiriejewskiego rozważań o człowieku

Philosophy of Religion through Two Lenses: Charles Hartshorne Reads Semen Frank