Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 9

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  język macedoński
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Формална и функционална анализа на предлогот во во македонските дијалекти

100%
Марковиќ М.
Rocznik Slawistyczny
|
2013
|
vol. 62
77-91
EN
In this text I try to present formal and functional picture of the preposition ‘vo’ in the Macedonian dialects. Also, I show the geographic distribution of the preposition ‘u’ (with the meaning at, beside). This helps to see how the prepositions ‘vo’ and ‘u’ are spread over the Macedonian dialectal territory, and also to see their formal and functional distribution. The prepositions ‘vo’ and ‘u’ are among the differential features that divide the western dialectal complex from southeastern dialectal complex. The two maps show that borders of their territories mainly correspond with the dialectal borders of two dialectal complexes. Regarding their functional fields – in the frames of the spatial relations (static vs. dynamic) both forms cover same fields. Thus, regarding static relation, both ‘vo’ (western complex) and ‘u’ (southeastern and northern complex) are used as markers of the position of the localized object regarding the localizer, i.e. the situations where a localized object takes part of the space determined by the localizer. Regarding the dynamic relation, we can see the same results, i.e. both ‘vo’ and ‘u’ are used as markers of the adlative relation (goal) which is the approximation of the localized object to the inside or inside borders of the localizer.
2

Македонски дијалектен атлас. Пролегомена, Скoпје : Институт за македонски јазик „Крсте Мисирков”, Одделение за дијалектологија на македонскиот јазик, 2008

88%
Pianka W.
Rocznik Slawistyczny
|
2010
|
vol. 59
181-185
3

Семантичка деривација на прасловенскиот глаголски корен *met- во македонскиот јазик

63%
Markovikj M.
Slavica Wratislaviensia
|
2017
|
vol. 165
267-276
EN
The subject of analysis in this paper is protoslavic verbal root *met‑which formal and se­mantic development can be traced from a very old period. The research is based on anthropocen­tric-spatial language theory which helps to analyze how the meaning embedded in some verbal roots representing basic human positions and movements can transfer and rise through evolution of the conceptualization (of the material and mental world). The author analyzes the derivativesof the pro­toslavic verbal root *met‑with embedded semantic components (move in all directions, throw…) and how the formal verbal and nominal derivatives carry this semantic information through langu­age evolution.
PL
Przedmiotem analizy jest protosłowiański rdzeń werbalny *met‑, którego formalny i semanty­czny rozwija się od dawien dawna. Badania opierają się na teorii antropocentryczno-przestrzennej, która pomaga dociec, w jaki sposób, osadzone w niektórych werbalnych korzeniach znaczenie, reprezentuje podstawowe ludzkie stany oraz konceptualizuje świat materialny i umysłowy. Autor analizuje pochodne protosłowiańskiego korzenia werbalnego *met‑wraz z wbudowanymi kompo­nentami semantycznymi (ruch we wszystkich kierunkach, czasownik „rzucać”…) oraz sprawdza, jak formalne słowne i nominalne pochodne instrumenty przenoszą tę semantyczną informację po­przez ewolucję językową.
4

Двојната определеност во македонскиот јазик

63%
Pančevska A.
Slavica Wratislaviensia
|
2020
|
vol. 171
121-126
EN
The subject of interest is the so-called double definiteness in the Macedonian language. These are cases where the noun phrase, besides the article, which is a marker of definiteness, is complemented with a demonstrative pronoun in a preposition. This phenomenon is not new in the Macedonian language but occurs more commonly especially in the spoken standard. The author attempts to understand the origin of this phenomenon as well as its distribution in the modern language. The conclusion is that a new type of article may be created, an analytical one.
PL
Przedmiotem analizy jest tak zwana podwójna określoność w języku macedońskim. Są to przypadki, w których nominalna fraza, oprócz morfemu rodzajnikowego, będącego wykładnikiem określoności, jest uzupełniona zaimkiem wskazującym w prepozycji. Zjawisko to nie jest nowe w języku macedońskim, ostatnio spotyka się je częściej, zwłaszcza w standardzie mówionym. Autor tekstu stara się wyjaśnić pochodzenie tego zjawiska, a także jego dystrybucję we współczesnym języku macedońskim. Analiza materiału prowadzi do wniosku, że być może powstaje nowy typ rodzajnika analitycznego.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Nowe strategie i dyskusje dotyczące współczesnych macedońskich przekładów Biblii oraz tekstow liturgicznych

63%
Stamatoski Z.
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
|
2012
|
vol. Język naszej modlitwy- dawniej i dziś
|
issue 3
159-169
EN
Macedonians are completely satisfied with the present form of their liturgical texts as far as their language is concerned, though at the same time they feel a constant need to prove their national and spiritual identity. For a long time Church Slavonic in its Russian version was used as the liturgical language, but in 1920s the contemporary language started taking gradually its place, the process growing stronger after the state acquired independence in 1991. First translations of biblical and liturgical texts into the contemporary language appeared after 1945, for example the four Gospels were translated from Church Slavonic by the archbishop of Ochrid and Macedonia, Gabriel II and printed in 1952. The first complete translation of the Bible into the contemporary Macedonian was edited in 1990, though it is strongly felt, especially in the circle of academic lecturers and translators of the liturgical texts, that the Bible should be translated from its original languages, which the lack of specialists in the domain makes difficult. The need to work out the Macedonian language, especially its liturgical version – free of Turkish and somewhat Greek influence - and the Macedonian liturgical music and singing rises many discussions, also among the Church hierarchy, professors of theology and musicologists both in the country as well as in the diaspora all over the world.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kategoria świadka w przekładzie prozy macedońskiej

63%
Błaszak M.
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
|
2009
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
143-151
MK
Целта на овој труд е да се покажат особеностите и можностите за преведување на прека жаноста во полскиот јазик. На почетокот претставена е ситуацијата на категоријата прекажаност во другите словенски јазици, потоа карактеристика на оваа категорија и нејзините дефиниции. Во трудот станува збор за епистемолошката модалност и нејзините особини, односно можностите за нејзиното изразување. На крај ги претставувам примерите, како може да се преведе македонската категорија прекажаност од македонската проза на полскиот јазик. Од анализата на наведените примери од полскиот јазик се гледа, дека полските преведувачи многу ретко ги искористуваат лексичките средства за изразување дистанса на зборувачот спрема прекажувани настани дури и прават грешки.
EN
The purpose of this article is to show the ways of expressing the Macedonian category of witness in Polish translations of Macedonian prose. At the beginning we present the situation of the прекажаност category against a background of the other Slavonic languages and than we characterize this category and its grammatical exponents. After that we describe the problem of truth modality which the category of witness is included in. We particularly take into concideration Polish language and the Macedonian adverbs serving this function. In the final part of this article we present some examples showing the Macedonian прекажаност category which are taken from the Polish translations of Macedonian texts. It lets us get the representation of the practical usage of the devices approchable for translators.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rozważania o tureckich sufiksach w języku macedońskim

63%
Sawicka I.
Linguistica Copernicana
|
2022
|
vol. 18
247-262
EN
In the article the grammatical / morphological problems generated by the Macedonian suffixes borrowed from the Turkish language are listed. The main topic is the etymology of the Slavic diminutive-hypocoristic suffix -чe. The possible influence of Turkish on the persistence and frequency of this suffix is considered.
PL
Artykuł wylicza problemy gramatyczne/morfonologiczne, jakie generują na gruncie języka macedońskiego sufiksy zapożyczone z języka tureckiego. Główny temat stanowią rozważania o etymologii słowiańskiego sufiksu deminutywno-hipokorystycznego -če. Pod uwagę brany jest ewentualny wpływ turecki na utrwalenie i frekwencję tego sufiksu.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Problem długich samogłosek w języku macedońskim

63%
Sawicka I.
Linguistica Copernicana
|
2021
|
vol. 17
143-151
EN
The author of the article considers the possibility of introducing long vowel phonemes into the inventory of Macedonian phonological units. On the basis of the arguments put forward, she rejects this idea.
PL
Autor artykułu rozważa możliwość wprowadzenia do inwentarza macedońskich jednostek fonologicznych długich fonemów samogłoskowych. Na podstawie przytaczanych argumentów propozycję tę odrzuca.
9
Content available remote

Independent directive (a) da-constructions with the imperfect tense in the Macedonian language

51%
Tofoska S.-S.
Rocznik Slawistyczny
|
2015
|
vol. 64
141-157
MK
Предмет на интерес на оваа статија се самостојните да-конструкции со глаголска форма во имперфект во македонскиот јазик, кои изразуваат нефактивно дејство, секогаш се изговараат со прашална интонација и пред кои речиси секогаш стои сврзникот/партикулата А. Примери: 1. А да ми се јавеше некогаш? (‘jави се некогаш, не си ми се јавил одамна/никогаш‘) 2. А да ја потскратеше косата? 3. А да дојдеше со нас? 4. А да седневме на кафе? Карактеристични се за разговорниот јазик, и обично се употребуваат во комуникација меѓу луѓе кои по некоја основа се чувствуваат блиски. Тие се употребуваат со директивно значење и тоа за да изразат молба, барање, желба, предлог, незадоволство, прекор и сл. што зависи од повеќе фактори, иако најмногу од интонацијата, и тоа ќе биде разгледано во оваа статија. Тргнуваме од поставката дека да-конструкциите во македонскиот јазик функционираат како експонент на субјунктивот (Конески 1986, Минова-Ѓуркова 1994, Тополињска 2008, 2009), сфаќајќи го субјунктивот како несамостојна, подредена модална конструкција, во функција на реченичен (пропозиционален) аргумент на предикати од повисок ред, чија фактивност и модално-темпорална карактеристика ја одредува надредениот предикат (сп. Karolak 1995). Исказите со самостојно употребените да-конструкции со имперфект, според функционалните зони во кои се јавуваат и значењата кои ги изразуваат соодветствуваат на некои од значењата на субјунктивот. Специфичноста на исказите со овој тип субјунктивни конструкции е во тоа што во нив се испреплетуваат семантички вредности и од деонтичката од епистемичката модалност. Исказите со да-конструкциите кои овде нè интересираат ги нарекуваме директиви (директивни) затоа што со нив на соговорникот му се дава насока, (дирекција) за некакво однесување и/или за дејство што треба да се изврши. (сп. Kramer 1986, Бужаровска 1999, Ницолова 2008). Тие соодветствуваат на манипулативните говорни чинови (manipulative speech acts) кај Гивон (Givon 1994:273), а тоа се наредбите, молбите/барањата, поттикнувањата/ наговарањата, кои искажуваат настани проицирани во иднина и ја засегаат деонтичката модалност. А токму таква употреба имаат и да-конструкциите кои ги анализираме. Целта на оваа анализа е да утврди: во какви типови на ситуации се употребуваат исказите со овие конструкции; дали спаѓаат во деонтичката или епистемичката модалност и дали се поблиску до едната или другата страна на зоната; дали има и какви се семантичките и прагматичките разлики меѓу истите типови на искази изразени со конструкциите со да+ имперфект наспрема исказите со да+презент; кои други фактори влијаат на значаењето на овие искази.
EN
The subject of interest in this paper are directive da-constructions with imperfect in Macedonian, which are non-factive, have interrogative intonation and almost always are preceded by the particle/conjunction a. Examples: 1. А да ми се јавеше некогаш? 2. А да ја потскратеше косата? 3. А да дојдеше со нас? 4. А да седневме на кафе? They are very common in informal use, in communication between people who are close to each other (friends, parent-child etc). They have a directive meaning and can express request, wish, exhortation, dissatisfaction, reproach etc., which depend on different factors, especially on the intonation, which will be analyzed in this paper. We assume that da-constructions in Macedonian function as an exponent of the subјunctive (Конески 1986, Минова-Ѓуркова 1994, Тополињска 2008, 2009), and we consider the subјunctive to be a dependant, subordinated modal construction which functions as a propositional argument of higher degree predicates and whose modal and temporal characteristics are determined by the superordinated predicate (Karolak 1995, Givón 1994). The meaning of the directive expressions with da-constructions + imperfect in Macedonian also belongs in the functional zones of the subjunctive. A peculiarity of this type of subjunctive constructions is that they have semantic features of both deontic and epistemic modality. They are directive (and as such belong to the deontic modality) by expressing a proposal of a course or a pattern of behaviour which should be carried out (Kramer 1986), and by expressing uncertainty (formulated as a question) they belong to the epistemic modality. The aim of this analysis is to determine in what types of situations they are used, which types are closer to the deontic and the epistemic zones of the modality, whether there are any semantic and pragmatic differences between directive da-constructions + imperfect and da-constructions + present, and what other factors shape the meaning of the expressions formed with these constructions.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.