Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  judicial control
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Judicial Control in the Context of the Concept of Legal Policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan

100%
Kuanaliyeva G.
Internal Security
|
2013
|
vol. 5(1)
107-112
EN
This article is devoted to judicial control in criminal legal proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the light of the new Concept of legal policy set till 2020. In the article, the general characteristics and concept of judicial control, and also its signs and types are considered. Different views of scientists are analyzed. Foreign experience in the application of judicial control is related. The author states their point of view on this problem and gives a definition of the concept of judicial control. The code of criminal procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan (RK Criminal Procedure Code) does not have a consolidated concept of judicial control. In the article, the author suggests making changes and additions to the existing Code of criminal procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan through a definition of judicial control. The decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan of August 24, 2009 No. 858, approved the Concept of legal policy of the Republic for the period from 2010 to 2020. The new Concept of legal policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, defines proposals for the development of the national legal system of the country in the following decade. The concept of legal policy includes the institution of judicial control. Since Kazakhstan gained independence, a set of laws was adopted including the rights directed on providing, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens. Certainly, in any country, however democratic it is, there are problems with human rights. But that Kazakhstan strongly intends to guarantee all Republic of Kazakhstan proclaimed in the Constitution the rights and freedoms of the citizens is obvious. Our country seeks the creation of a constitutional state, and tries to provide a guarantee from a certain arbitrariness in the activity of the competent government bodies and officials. In the Concept of legal policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan it is specified: “…priority of development of the criminal procedure right there is a further consecutive realization of the fundamental principles of the criminal legal proceedings directed on protection of the rights and freedoms of the person”. And in judicial control is also such a guarantee.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Le diable est dans les détails – czyli kilka refleksji na temat kontrolno-nadzorczych dylematów dotyczących regulaminów organizacyjnych urzędów gmin

100%
Lisowski P.
Studia Prawa Publicznego
|
2022
|
issue 4 (40)
45-62
EN
The paper is based on an analysis of the provisions pertaining to the adoption of the house rules of municipality offices and the regulations specifying the rules and the procedure of exercising supervision over these acts of executive bodies, as well as of subjecting them to the direct control of administrative courts. This analysis has revealed that the approach to the form in which the above issues are regulated should be revised towards such regulations and practice of applying law that would facilitate having more regard for the attributes of the independence of self-governmental administration in this field. The treatment that these features have received (especially in the practice of supervisory organs and judicature’s output) has so far not explored or respected this potential. Taking also into account the experience (both doctrinal and related to administrative practice) gathered in the period of over 32 years since the reestablishment of territorial self-government in Poland, the paper thus argues that, at least in certain areas, the process of overcoming the limitations linked to the rationing – so to speak – of the attributes of decentralization (especially: of independence as one of its components) should be initiated. Therefore, the paper postulates in this context that invalidity sanction be substituted by the derogation in the form of revocation (that is: an ex tunc effect should be substituted by an ex nunc effect). The paper also signals that, when dealing with these forms of self-governmental activities, it may be possible to depart from the automatic application of the temporary protection related to the delivery of a supervisory adjudication (i.e. from the mechanism that presumes automatic sui generis acceleration of the enforceability of a supervisory adjudication). This stance has been additionally supported by the discussion of the specificity of organizational administrative law (in particular – with regard to the acts of non-municipal law, while allowing for the complex character of the house rules of municipality offices) which takes into account the conception of institutional choice.
3

Judicial Control over the Activities of Law-Enforcement Agencies in Ukraine

100%
Muzychuk A.
Internal Security
|
2013
|
vol. 5(1)
113-120
EN
The purpose of this paper is to characterize judicial control over the activities of law-enforcement agencies in Ukraine. The author attempts to define its concept and features; he determines its subtypes, the subject, forms of implementation, special features, and peculiarities as one of the forms of state control. Judicial control is carried out during the implementation of the judicial power. The subject of judicial control over the law-enforcement agencies is their professional activity, namely the legality and validity of their use of coercive measures, the imposition of administrative penalties, making administrative or procedural decisions, conducting some law-enforcement actions (arrest, search, seizure, wire-tapping, etc.). The author notes that the most common form of judicial control over the activities of law-enforcement agencies is verification of legality and validity of their actions (inactivity) and decisions. The paper provides a definition of direct and indirect judicial control over the activities of law-enforcement agencies. The author emphasizes that direct control involves direct intervention in the operational activities of the controlled entity, and indirect is implemented during the rulings. As the subjects of control over the activities of law-enforcement agencies the courts, for example, verify the legality and validity of the decisions of law-enforcement agencies and their respective officers, some law-enforcement activities carried out by them, authorize permissions to arrest, search, seizure, interrogation, carrying out some investigative activities, examine complaints of citizens, consider different investigator’s versions, decide on the case, which may change or cancel previous decisions of a law-enforcement body, initiate control actions by other entities; implement legal sanctions. The author suggests defining judicial control as the implementation by the courts (judges) controlling actions of preventive, coercive and law-restoring nature in order to ensure the legality and validity of the decisions and actions of law-enforcement agencies and their personnel.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Judicial control of the effectiveness of activities related to public administration

100%
Jaśkiewicz J.
Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa
|
2021
|
issue 10
29-44
PL
Procedury prawne w Europie powinny respektować zasady sprawiedliwości proceduralnej. Zasady te obejmują zestaw warunków zapewniających rzeczywiste, szybkie i skuteczne rozpatrzenie sprawy, zgodnie z gwarancjami określonymi w art. 6 i 13 Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka, rozwijanymi w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. W artykule przedstawiono charakterystykę polskiego postępowania sądowego w zakresie egzekwowania skuteczności działań administracji publicznej w świetle tych wymagań. W ramach tego systemu omówione zostały również środki prawne zapobiegające opóźnieniom w działaniach administracji oraz dyscyplinujące i przyspieszające krajowe postępowania administracyjne.
EN
Legal procedures in Europe must comply with the principles of procedural fairness. These rules include a set of conditions ensuring real, fast and effective consideration of the case in accordance with guarantees stipulated under Article 6 and Article 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, taken by jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. The article presents the characteristics of Polish court proceeding in the scope of enforcing the effectiveness of public administration activities in the light of these requirements. Legal remedies to prevent tardiness of administration actions as well as discipline efficiency and speed of national administrative proceedings within this system were also discussed.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Discretionary Power of Public Administration and Control of Public Debt: The Citizen and the Judge between the Law and the Precedent

63%
Pesce G.
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
|
2020
|
vol. 29
|
issue 3
EN
Discretionary power, a central feature of administrative power, comes into play when administration is called to select an option between two or more solution and a way of balancing between public and private interests. After the 20th century, devastated by wars, public deficit and debt, most State models circumscribed their markets to the detriment of the global one, turning the old economic models into new ones after the 1958 Treaty of Rome and, after the phase following the Maastricht Treaty of 1992, and the crisis of 2008, the final concept is that the EU Members States should restructure the public finances, facing the increase of the public goods and services demand and with the rested rights. The purpose of this article was to enquire whether the European and national rules may limit the discretionary power while expanding the administrative one.
PL
Władza dyskrecjonalna jako główna cecha władzy administracyjnej ma miejsce wówczas, gdy administracja jest upoważniona do przypisania konkretnego znaczenia, dokonując wyboru spośród kilku możliwości, który jest sposobem zrównoważenia interesów publicznych i prywatnych. Po XX stuleciu, zdewastowanym wojnami, deficytem publicznym i długiem, większość modeli państwowych ograniczyła swoje rynki ze szkodą dla rynku globalnego, zmieniając stare modele ekonomiczne w nowe po traktacie rzymskim z 1958 r., traktacie z Maastricht z 1992 r. i kryzysie, jaki nastąpił w 2008 r. Ostateczną propozycją jest to, że państwa członkowskie UE powinny zrestrukturyzować finanse publiczne w obliczu wzrostu popytu na dobra publiczne i usługi. Celem artykułu było zbadanie, czy regulacje europejskie i krajowe mogą ograniczać uprawnienia dyskrecjonalne przy rozszerzaniu zakresu przepisów administracyjnych.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Judicial Control in Integrated Composite Administrative Proceedings – Monism or Duality of Protection of Individual Rights?

63%
Wilbrandt-Gotowicz M.
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
|
2023
|
vol. 32
|
issue 1
293-319
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu jest analiza i ocena standardów prawnych dotyczących środków zaskarżenia w sprawach administracyjnych rozpatrywanych w postępowaniach złożonych, tj. w postępowaniach, w których organy administracji państw członkowskich i administracja unijna współpracują ze sobą. Problematyka kontroli sądowej w tego typu procedurach jest szczególnie istotna z punktu widzenia realizacji wyrażonej w art. 47 Karty Praw Podstawowych zasady efektywnej ochrony sądowej. Wątpliwości budzi zwłaszcza kwestia adekwatnego systemu środków zaskarżenia: monistycznego (opartego wyłącznie na krajowych lub unijnych środkach zaskarżenia) bądź dualistycznego (zakładającego współistnienie w sprawach danego rodzaju środków krajowych i unijnych). Rozważania w tym przedmiocie oparto na doktrynalnej koncepcji postępowań złożonych jako specyficznej grupy postępowań zintegrowanych z prawem unijnym, a także na aktualnym orzecznictwie Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej. W zakończeniu przedstawiono postulaty de lege lata i de lege ferenda służące zapewnieniu efektywnej ochrony sądowej w tego typu postępowaniach.
EN
The article analyses and evaluates legal standards concerning administrative legal remedies in administrative matters dealt with in composite proceedings, i.e. proceedings in which Member State administrative bodies and the EU administration cooperate. The issue of judicial control in such procedures is particularly important from the point of view of the implementation of the principle of effective judicial protection expressed in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The issue of an adequate system of legal remedies – monistic (based solely on national or EU remedies) or dualistic (assuming coexistence of national and EU remedies in cases of a given type) one – raises particular concerns. Considerations in this respect are based on the doctrinal concept of composite proceedings as a specific group of proceedings integrated into the EU law, as well as the current case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The conclusion presents de lege lata and de lege ferenda postulates to ensure effective judicial protection in this type of proceedings.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Model kontroli sądowej decyzji Prezesa Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej

51%
Chołodecki M.
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
|
2012
|
vol. 1
|
issue 6
9-19
PL
Artykuł poświęcony jest modelowi kontroli sądowej decyzji wydawanych przez Prezesa UKE. Model ten jest określony w ustawie z dnia 16.07.2004 r. Prawo Telekomunikacyjne i przewiduje, że kontrolę sądową decyzji wydanych przez Prezesa UKE sprawują sądy administracyjne. Jednakże od niektórych decyzji tego organu przysługuje odwołanie do sądu powszechnego (Sądu Okręgowego w Warszawie – Sądu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów). Oba rodzaje kontroli sądowej decyzji wydawanych przez Prezesa UKE różnią się od siebie zasadniczo. W związku z tym, głównym celem artykułu jest przedstawienie charakteru prawnego modelu kontroli sądowej decyzji wydawanych przez Prezesa UKE oraz przedstawienie istotnych różnic w sposobach kontroli sądowej sprawowanej przez oba rodzaje sądów, tj. sądy administracyjne oraz sądy powszechne (SOKiK).
EN
The model of judicial control of the decisions of the President of the Offi ce of Electronic Communications (hereinafter the UKE President) is subject of this paper. This model is defined in the Telecommunications Law Act (hereinafter the TL) and provides two different judicial procedures against decisions of the UKE President. It is a general principle that the UKE President decisions are subject to judicial control exercised by administrative courts. However, some decisions enumerated in the TL are subject of judicial review exercised by common courts [the Regional Court in Warsaw – the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection (hereinafter the SOKiK)]. Both types of judicial control differ from each other substantially. Therefore, the main goal of the article was to present a model of judicial control of the decisions made by the UKE President together with an indication of the legal basis of this model. In addition, signifi cant differences were determined in the way of judicial control by both types of courts, i.e. the administrative courts and common courts (SOKiK).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.