Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  judicial proceedings
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Konanie o návrat maloletého do cudziny pri neoprávnenom premiestnení alebo zadržaní

100%
Kucbelová L., Kazanský R.
Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka – Refleksje
|
2019
|
vol. 34(34)
65-95
PL
This article deals with the legal processing of a serious problem regarding societal security, human rights and the rights of minors, i.e. child abduction. The procedure of the returning of an abducted child is one of the most challenging types of court proceedings. Courts decide within the statutory time limit of six weeks after filing the petition. There is a foreign element in the proceedings, embodied either by the parties to the proceedings or by the necessity of clarifying the child’s habitual residence. Translators or interpreters are recruited to guarantee the parties’ right to act in their mother tongues. The court, as a rule, executes and orders expert evidence within a short period of time, for example to determine the circumstances that rule out the return of the minor to his/her country. As a rule, hearings take place all day or several days in a row. Courts apply international treaties and EU law when making decisions. The difficulty of bringing proceedings is additionally increased by frequent requests from the court hearing the authorities of the Member State of the habitual residence of the minor. The return of the child is usually accompanied by tensions between the parties, emotions and stress.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Child abduction proceedings

100%
Kucbelová L., Kazanský R.
Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka – Refleksje
|
2019
|
vol. 34(34)
65-95
EN
This article deals with the legal processing of a serious problem regarding societal security, human rights and the rights of minors, i.e. child abduction. The procedure of the returning of an abducted child is one of the most challenging types of court proceedings. Courts decide within the statutory time limit of six weeks after filing the petition. There is a foreign element in the proceedings, embodied either by the parties to the proceedings or by the necessity of clarifying the child’s habitual residence. Translators or interpreters are recruited to guarantee the parties’ right to act in their mother tongues. The court, as a rule, executes and orders expert evidence within a short period of time, for example to determine the circumstances that rule out the return of the minor to his/her country. As a rule, hearings take place all day or several days in a row. Courts apply international treaties and EU law when making decisions. The difficulty of bringing proceedings is additionally increased by frequent requests from the court hearing the authorities of the Member State of the habitual residence of the minor. The return of the child is usually accompanied by tensions between the parties, emotions and stress.
3
Content available remote

Instytucja tak zwanej rozprawy odmiejscowionej w świetle art. 517b § 2a Kodeksu postępowania karnego

100%
Myrna B.
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
|
2014
|
vol. XII
|
issue 3
117-123
EN
The article deals with the new institution which was introduced into the criminal procedure within accelerated proceedings system, that is the so-called “away” or “stadium” trial (held in a place outside the regular court of law). In the paper, the regulations of the Criminal Proceedings Code (CPC), which treat about this trial institution, are analyzed, in particular Art. 517b § 2a CPC, Art.517b § 2b CPC, Art. 517b § 2c CPC and Art. 517b § 2d CPC, as well as others relating to the above-mentioned institution. Furthermore, the author presents his critical attitude towards this regulation of the CPC, making reference to univocally negative opinions and arguments voiced by both representatives of criminal law doctrine and practicians in this respect.
4

Uzasadnienie voti separati a prawo do sądu. Zależności i gwarancje

87%
Grochowski M.
Studia Prawnicze
|
2014
|
issue 4 (200)
49-60
EN
The text provides an insight into the relation between the formal motives (justifycation) of votum separatum in judicial proceedngs and a right to due process. Because of to the complex axiological and functional character of the motives of judge’s dissent, the interdependence in question is not obvious, nor clear. Weakening the stability and social prestige of the judgment, as well as breaking the confidency of judges’ dispute, the votum separatum (mainly through its motives) contributes simultaneously to improving the overall quality of discourse accompanying application of law. It provides new points of reference that can or ought to be addressed at a few levels – within the grounds of the judgment (against which the dissent has been directed), by the court of higher instance, by other courts, as a „quasi-precedential” ruling, etc. For that reasons, although the separate opinion is not an obviouness for the legal system, introduction of this instrument entails quite automatically a need for a duty to justify it.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dowód z kultury (cultural evidence)

86%
Koropczuk A.
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej
|
2014
|
vol. 2(9)
35-42
PL
This article concisely presents the question of cultural evidence and the way it is conducted on the basis of judicial proceedings. It also highlights the distinction in the manner cultural evidence is considered on the basis of common and continental law. The author assumes that modern society is a multicultural society. It is a society in which role models and patterns of conduct are only created within the contact and conflict of different cultures. Solutions proposed in the article refer to the cases based on the cultural defense, where the culture is treated as a factor determining the actions of individuals. Cultural evidence has to be – in the authors’ opinion – a mean to demonstrate the clearance of the individual to take action subjected to the proceeding. Hence, the author outlines the procedure in case of the necessity of conducting such evidence.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Udział przedstawiciela społecznego w postępowaniu immunitetowym w świetle obowiązujących przepisów

72%
Markiewicz T.
Kwartalnik Trzeci Sektor
|
2022
|
issue 59-60 (3-4/2022)
67-77
EN
The article presents arguments for the position that the social representative referred to in Art. 90 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, may participate in immunity proceedings, which are “judicial proceedings” within the meaning of the law and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the view according to which a social representative cannot participate in the immunity proceedings is erroneous, since these proceedings are only an element of the preparatory proceedings, and therefore are not “judicial proceedings”. Thus, no legislative change is necessary for a representative of a social organization to participate in the immunity proceedings
PL
W artykule przedstawiono argumentację na rzecz stanowiska, że przedstawiciel społeczny, o którym mowa w art. 90 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania karnego, może brać udział w postępowaniu immunitetowym, będącym „postępowaniem sądowym” w rozumieniu prawa i orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego. Błędny jest zatem pogląd, zgodnie z którym przedstawiciel społeczny nie może uczestniczyć w postępowaniu immunitetowym, gdyż postępowanie to jest wyłącznie elementem postępowania przygotowawczego, a więc nie jest „postępowaniem sądowym”. Aby przedstawiciel organizacji społecznej mógł brać udział w postępowaniu immunitetowym, nie jest tym samym konieczna żadna zmiana legislacyjna.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Glosa do postanowienia SN z 23 lipca 2020 r., II KO 42/20

51%
Dąbrowski J. A.
|
2020
|
vol. 14
|
issue 3
207-219
EN
The ruling that is analysed in the gloss concerns the scope of obligations of a court that lodges a motion with the Supreme Court in accordance with Article 37 CPC to refer a case for hearing to another court of the same instance, and states that the risk to the good of the administration of justice results from the lack of possibilities of conducting a trial before a court having territorial jurisdiction, due to the bad state of health of a party to the proceedings. Providing the justification of the Supreme Court extended by the criteria for referring a case in accordance with Article 37 CPC, the author proves the grounds for the opinion that the discussed requirement must be up-to-date on the date of lodging the motion concerned.
PL
Glosowane postanowienie dotyczy zakresu obowiązków sądu zwracającego się w trybie art. 37 k.p.k. do Sądu Najwyższego o przekazanie sprawy do rozpoznania innemu sądowi równorzędnemu i podnoszącego, że zagrożenie dla dobra wymiaru sprawiedliwości wynika z braku możliwości prowadzenia procesu przed sądem miejscowo właściwym z uwagi na zły stan zdrowia strony postępowania. Autor – rozbudowując argumentację przedstawioną przez Sąd Najwyższy o kryteria przekazania sprawy na tej podstawie w trybie art. 37 k.p.k. – wykazuje zasadność poglądu, że omawiana przesłanka musi pozostawać aktualna w dacie wystąpienia ze stosownym wnioskiem.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.