Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: krytyka form

Sort By:

Limit search:

O obowiązywalności wczesnych dekretów Papieskiej Komisji Biblijnej

100%

Chaberek M.

Polonia Sacra

2020

vol. 24

issue 4

The early „Responses” of the Pontifical Biblical Commission ranked as doctrinal statements and their purpose was to delineate the boundaries of Catholic orthodoxy in Biblical studies. The decrees have never lost their formal status even though they have been nearly universally abandoned by theologians. In 1955 an anonymous article was published whose goal was to diminish the authority of the “Responses” and present them as outdated. However, there was no ecclesiastical authority of any sort behind the article. Today we need to see the documents as the testimony of the ever-actual Church Magisterium according to the principle of hermeneutics of continuity promoted by Pope Benedict XVI.

Wczesne „Odpowiedzi” Papieskiej Komisji Biblijnej miały rangę dokumentów doktrynalnych, a ich celem było wyznaczenie granic katolickiej ortodoksji w studiach Pisma Świętego. Dekrety te nigdy nie utraciły swojego znaczenia formalnego, choć zostały niemal całkowicie zapomniane i unieważnione przez teologów. W 1955 roku ukazał się anonimowy artykuł, którego celem było ograniczenie autorytetu „Odpowiedzi” i uznanie ich za przestarzałe. Jednak za artykułem tym nie stał żaden formalny autorytet Kościoła. Obecnie wypada spojrzeć na te dokumenty jako na świadectwo nieustannie aktualnego Magisterium Kościoła zgodnie z zasadą „hermeneutyki ciągłości”.

The Literary Form and the Message of John 8:31-36

61%

Kubiś A.

The Biblical Annals

2014

vol. 4

issue 1

121-145

The paper deals with the relationship between the literary form and the message of the pericope John 8:31-36 (along with its immediate literary context). Our examination of five different possible literary forms demonstrated that identifying the precise form bears directly on grasping the correct semantics and pragmatics of this Johannine passage. John 8:31-36 actually reflects the merging of at least two different literary forms: misunderstanding (also called riddle and test) and the covenantal offer of freedom. The ultimate meaning of the text, taken as a whole, should be seen as the offer of freedom. This, however, is misunderstood and eventually rejected by Jesus’ interlocutors, who failed to recognize in Jesus God, the Redeemer and Liberator, and thus did not pass the test of being his true disciples.

Refine search results

1 Polonia Sacra

1 The Biblical Annals

1 Chaberek M.

1 Kubiś A.

1 2020

1 2014

Search results

O obowiązywalności wczesnych dekretów Papieskiej Komisji Biblijnej

The Literary Form and the Message of John 8:31-36