Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: kulturna politika

Sort By:

Limit search:

Przekłady literatury słoweńskiej w Polsce w latach 2007—2013 — komentarz

100%

Gawlak M.

Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich

2014

vol. 5

issue 2

209-221

Komentar predstavlja prevode slovenske literature, izdane na Poljskem v letih 2007—2013. V tem obdobju so izšli prevodi slovenske proze (mdr. Jančarja, Virka, Žabota, Mazzinija , Vojnovića, Möderndorferja, Frančiča, Novakove) in poezije (mdr. Šalamuna, Čučnika, Kosovela, Franči ča, Osojnika, Kušarjeve) — tako v knjižni obliki kot tudi v revijalnih in časopisnih objavah. Izšle so še druge publikacije, kot so antologije ter zvezki, ki so sad prevajalskih delavnic. Komentar zajema knjižne izdaje, saj prav te oblikujejo literarno zavest sekundarne kulture. Razveseljivo je, da trenutno lahko opazimo vse več objav prevodov slovenske literature, saj se povečuje tudi potreba po dopolnitvi in izostritvi slike slovenske kulture v zavesti poljskega prejemnika, nekega »kulturnega stereotipa«, ki ga bralci usvajajo s prihajajočimi besedili. Kar zadeva recepcijo, se zdi ključnega pomena, da so prevodi slovenskih avtorjev izšli v samozaložbah ali pri lokalnih založnikih (z izjemo Jančarja, Virka in Čučnika). Razvidno je, da bi bilo koristno ustanoviti dosledno kulturno in založniško politiko ter zagotoviti ustrezno širitveno strategijo, ki bi prispevala k okrepljenemu in razširjenemu tvornemu dialogu med slovensko in poljsko literaturo.

The commentary constitues a presentation of Slovenian literature translations published in Poland between 2007—2013. In mentioned period of time the translation of prose (among others written by Jančar, Virk, Žabot, Mazzini, Vojnovic, Möderndorfer, Frančič, Novak) and Slovenian poetry (Šalamun, Čučnik, Kosovel, Frančič, Osojnik, Kušar) appeared both as independent book publications as well as texts presented in periodicals and regular press. Also publications printed as anthology and releases which were a result of translation workshops were developed. In the commentary the author’s concern focuses mainly on books publications due to the fact that they are shaping the literary awareness of secondary culture. It is comforting that presently the increasing tendency for publishing translations of Slovenian literature can be observed. There is a growing need to strengthen and complement the image of Slovenian culture in the Polish reader’s consciousness, a kind of “cultural stereotype” which the reading community assimilate along with the growth of another texts. From the perspective of reception the most important issue seems to be that translations of Slovenian authors (besides Jančar, Virk and Čučnik) were published by independent, local and niche publishing houses. It is clearly seen that creating a coherent cultural‑publishing strategy and providing appropriate popularizing strategy would contribute to enriching, creative dialogue between Slovenian and Polish literature.

O stereotypach w recepcji literatury chorwackiej w Polsce w latach 1944—1956

100%

Małczak L.

Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich

2013

vol. 4

issue 1

253-268

U članku se govori o dvama stereotipima u recepciji hrvatske književnosti u razdoblju od 1944. do 1956. g. Najprije je Jugoslavija politički saveznik, srodan po slavenskom porijeklu, poslije postaje najveći neprijatelj. Ovo se razdoblje sastoji od dva dijela. U prvom od 1944. do 1948. autori iz Jugoslavije prikazuju književnost kao jedinstvenu, jugoslavensku, dok poljski autori instistiraju na razlikama. Tematski književnost se svodi na književnost o ratnoj tematici, a pisci su vrednovani na temelju njihovih političkih opredjeljenja. Oni koji su bili skloni partizanima jesu napredni, socijalistički, oni koji su živjeli u okupiranim zemljama ostaju pod štetnim uticajem zapadne kulture, buržoazijskih principa. U drugom razdoblju od 1949. do 1956., poslije rezolucije Informbiroa, književnost Jugoslavije u Poljskoj prikazuje se kao jedinstvena, prekinuta je svaka vrsta suradnje i komunikacije, govori se da u književnom stvaralaštvu dolazi do niza negativnih pojava koje se opisuju pomoću ratne retorike i najčešće imenuju kao fašizacija, amerikanizacija kulture.

There are two stereotypes in the reception of Croatian literature in the period of 1944—1956. Yugoslavia was a political ally for Comunist and Slavic countries in the begining. After 1948, after the Cominform Resolution of June 28th, it became one of their worst enemies. In the first period from 1944 to 1948 the Yugoslav authors present literature as coherent Yugoslav literature, with Polish reviewers insisting on the diffrences between the Yugoslav republics. Yugoslav literature in this period was about war, and writers are judged according to their political profiles and attitude during the World War II. The ones who symphatized with Partisans were progressive, the ones who lived in the occupied coutries were under the harmful infulence of Western culture, with its bourgeois values. After the Cominform Resolution, the literatures of the various Yugoslav republics are presented as homogeneous with no cultural differences. Every type of communication between Yugoslavia and Poland is broken down at that time. There is war rethoric in extremely negative Polish presentations of literary production in Yugoslavia in the second period.

Refine search results

2 Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich

1 Gawlak M.

1 Małczak L.

1 2014

1 2013

Search results

Przekłady literatury słoweńskiej w Polsce w latach 2007—2013 — komentarz

O stereotypach w recepcji literatury chorwackiej w Polsce w latach 1944—1956