Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: kumoterstwo

Sort By:

Limit search:

Rzecz o nepotyzmie i kumoterstwie

100%

Rosicki R.

Przegląd Politologiczny

2012

issue 2

131-146

The paper comprises an introduction, four parts, and conclusions. The introduction char- acterizes the fundamental notions discussed in the paper, namely kin selection, nepotism, cronyism and political capitalism. The first part of the paper concerns kin selection and reciprocal altruism, which are deemed to be the fundamental mechanisms of socialization. This part indicates that nepotism has a biological justification (and in R. Dawkins’ interpretation – a genetic justification). The mechanisms of kin selection and reciprocal altruism raise the question of whether nepotism is not a natural phenomenon in humans. If so, this means that the negative assessment of these phenomena of public life goes against natural human inclinations. The second part of the paper refers to the origins of the notion of nepotism and to a particu- lar understanding of the public realm in modern democracies. The development of democracy has been related to the transformation of the mechanisms of governance which consisted in concessions made by the authorities to those demanding changes. Political struggle has been minimized as it was directed at competition among citizens. The struggle for the change of power has been replaced by the struggle for access to positions and goods in the public realm. Axiological justification has been provided by social justice as a claim for equal access to goods by virtue of principles of transparency. The third part of the paper discusses the issue of nepotism and cronyism in public opinion. It refers to the results of public opinion surveys concerning, among other things, favoritism, ways of looking for jobs, unequal opportunities on account of social status, and the social sta- tus of the family. Additionally, selected examples of nepotism and favoritism in political life are presented. The fourth part deals with the issue of political capitalism both in the interpretation of M. Weber and as a phenomenon of the transition of the Polish socio-political system. Political capitalism can be defined in a nutshell as using state structures or political positions for an un- fair distribution of goods and is expressed by muddy links between the representatives of state with the private business sphere.

Nieetyczny wymiar korupcji

63%

Pięta K.

Rozprawy Społeczne

2019

vol. 13

issue 4

25-36

Abstract In the article on the problem of corruption, which have become a global phenomenon over the years. Attention was paid to its unethical dimension, arguments and threats as well as corruption according to John Paul II and KNS Material and methods Browse literature and various articles on corruption. Results The development of corruption and the constant use of the state budget to realize its own benefits. The use of corruption from nepotism, clientelism to bribery. The impact of corruption on the destruction of social fabric and the destruction of the individual. Conclusions Corruption from a sociological point of view belongs to mechanisms degrading the moral fabric of society. It violates social trust and reduces the resources of social capital, which negatively affects the functioning of society, development and the quality of social life of individuals. Corruption, due to its unethical dimension, also affects the devastation of moral principles.

Streszczenie W artykule przedstawiono problem zjawiska korupcji, które z biegiem lat stało się zjawiskiem globalnym. Zwrócono uwagę na jego nieetyczny wymiar, skótki i zagrożenia oraz korupcję w ujęciu Jana Pawła II i KNS Materiał i metody Przeglądanie literatury oraz różnych artykułów w na temat korupcji. Wyniki Rozwój korupcji i nieustanne wykorzystywanie budżetu państwa na rzecz realizacji własnych korzyści. Stosowanie wszelakich zachować korupcyjnych od nepotyzmu, klientelizmu po łapownictwo. Wpływ korupcji na niszczenie tkanki społecznej oraz destrukcję jednostki. Wnioski Korupcja z socjologicznego punktu widzenia należy do mechanizmów degradujących moralną tkankę społeczeństwa. Narusza społeczne zaufanie i obniżają zasoby kapitału społecznego wpływa negatywnie na funkcjonowanie społeczeństwa, rozwój oraz jakość życia społecznego jednostek. Korupcja ze względu na swój nieetyczny wymiar wpływa również na dewastowanie zasad moralnych.

Refine search results

1 Przegląd Politologiczny

1 Rozprawy Społeczne

1 Pięta K.

1 Rosicki R.

1 2020

1 2012

Search results

Rzecz o nepotyzmie i kumoterstwie

Nieetyczny wymiar korupcji