Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  kyberprostor
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Abuse of cyberspace within the crisis in Ukraine

100%
Valuch J., Hamuľák O.
The Lawyer Quarterly
|
2018
|
vol. 8
|
issue 2
94-107
EN
The cyber sphere forms a fifth domain of activities were interactions between state and non-state actors could happen. It starts to play an important role within the conflicts and hostilities. Especially in these situations, international society does not have a unified view on the question how to deal with the activities in cyberspace. We could see the different forms of abuse of cyberspace also within the crisis in Ukraine. This crisis is a good example of the complexity of the legal approach and the (non)capability of the legal understanding of cyber operations and attacks. The goal of this article is to highlight this complexity and to determine the status of cyber incidents realized in the Ukraine from the perspective of international law.
2
Content available remote

Povaha zásahu do informačního soukromí člověka

84%
Kasl F.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2019
|
vol. 158
|
issue 7
674-679
EN
The contribution discusses the nature of the information privacy as a form of privacy, which is by its position close to the issues of personal data protection. The reader is first presented with privacy as one of the components of the general personality right and then further acquainted with various perspectives on classification and definition of this phenomenon. Following this introduction into the topic comes a discussion of the information privacy in the attempt for definition of its specific nature and delimitation of the boundaries of this element of privacy in comparison to the remaining ones through identification of prerequisites for a harmful interference, which does not touch upon other rights or components of the general personality right of a person.
CS
Příspěvek diskutuje povahu informačního soukromí jakožto formy soukromí, která je svým postavením blízká problematice ochrany osobních údajů. Čtenáři je nejprve představeno soukromí jako jedna ze složek všeobecného osobnostního práva a následně je seznámen s různými náhledy na klasifikaci a vymezení tohoto fenoménu. Po tomto úvodu do problematiky je diskutováno informační soukromí ve snaze o vymezení jeho specifické podstaty a stanovení hranic této složky soukromí oproti jiným skrze určení předpokladů škodlivého zásahu, který se nedotýká jiných práv či složek všeobecného osobnostního práva člověka.
3
Content available remote

Nové formy občianskej neposlušnosti v kyberpriestore

67%
Kasinec R., Šurkala J.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2018
|
vol. 157
|
issue 5
437-446
EN
The authors address the problem of cyber disobedience and hacktivism in contemporary world. Firstly, they try to distinguish cyber disobedience from the traditional forms of civil disobedience. The main differences they see in avoidance of punishment for illegal conduct, exercising these activities in the cyber space and specific nature of "non-violence", which is at least disputable. They put to the correlation the anonymity of the actions and avoidance to accept the punishment for criminal deeds. They argue that the status quo - where virtually all acts of hacktivism are considered illegal and in the same time very little of such acts are punished - conserved the strange equilibrium. However, they prognose that the importance of cyber disobedience will grow in the near future and this movement should be followed by proper changes of the law in action.
SK
Autori svoju pozornosť upriamili na problém kybernetickej neposlušnosti a haktivizmu v súčasnom svete. Najskôr sa pokúsili odlíšiť kybernetickú neposlušnosť od tradičných foriem občianskej neposlušnosti. Hlavné rozdiely nachádzajú najmä vo vyhýbaní sa trestnej zodpovednosti za protiprávne konanie, v realizovaní týchto aktivít v kyberpriestore a v špecifickej forme "nenásilia", ktorá je minimálne diskutabilná. Kladú do vzájomnej korelácie anonymitu pri výkone akcií a následné odmietnutie sankcie, ktorá hrozí za toto protiprávne konanie. Autori ďalej tvrdia, že nastolený status quo - kde sú prakticky všetky činy hacktivizmu považované za nezákonné a zároveň veľmi málo z takýchto činov je reálne potrestaných - si zachovali podivnú rovnováhu. Napriek tomu, význam a aktivity predstaviteľov kybernetickej neposlušnosti budú v nasledujúcich rokoch narastať, čo si bude vyžadovať nevyhnutné zásahy i v právnej oblasti.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.