Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  labour protection
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the proposed draft position the author points to the incompatibility with the Constitution of Article 2 of the Act amending the Act on the State Fire Service in the section containing the phrase “in the accounting period immediately preceding the entry into force of this Act”. In the explanatory memorandum, the author points out that internal differentiation of the officers of the so called uniformed services is acceptable from the perspective of the constitutional principle of equality and is supported inter alia by the specific nature of the service these officers and specificity of the risks they undertake. In the opinion of the author, the legislature should uniformly regulate the legal status of all officers. Moreover, the proceedings in relation to the remaining scope should be discontinued due to the inadmissibility of rendering the judgment.
Studia Prawa Publicznego
|
2021
|
vol. 2
|
issue 34
125-144
PL
The labour inspector’s statement constitutes a non-statutory form of enforcing labour rights. In this context, we can see a variety of problems related both to the impact of the legal measure itself, appealing against it, as well as to the role it plays in ensuring compliance with employment rights. The jurisprudence and literature to date indicates explicitly that the employer’s failure to comply with the content of the labour inspector’s speech does not give rise to any negative legal consequences. Nevertheless, employers who do not agree with the solutions recommended by the authority through the labour inspector’s speech perceive this specific measure as a special type of decision. The decision itself, in turn, seems to be a natural manifestation of the state, the authority indicating to the subject of law the individual directions of its behaviour. However, this is, in fact, a different act. The article doubts the implementation of the model of labour supervision and control assumed by the legislator in the light of the measure outlined in the labour inspector’s speech. As a result, allowing this measure to be left to the inspector’s discretionary use may lead to the reinforcement of the feeling of a lack of efficiency on the part of the state bodies in the field of protection of workers’ rights, especially that the cases of its use are an open catalogue, which includes issues such as working time or the employment of young people. In order to better understand these trends, two examples are discussed where the National Labour Inspectorate had an impact on situations of a gross violation of labour law standards. A de lege ferenda direction has also been indicated, which means the creation of the institution of “re-inspection” of the employer. The existence of a non-authoritative “recommendation”, which is a statement by the labour inspector, is in fact a manifestation of the implementation of Article 17, paragraph 2 of the ILO Convention No. 81, which would not be incompatible with the consequence in the form of addressing a statement.
EN
The fundamental issue raised in this elaboration comes down to an attempt at defining the character and content of labour protection and the place of the National Labour Inspectorate in the system of state authorities in Poland. The analysis relates to the applicable constitutional regulation (Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997) and statutory regulations. The purpose of the considerations is to determine the nature of the activity of the National Labour Inspectorate as well as its location within the constitutional systematizations.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.