Search results

1

Wariancja innowacyjna w normie skodyfikowanej w ostatnich stu latach rozwoju polszczyzny

100%

Zbróg P.

Polonica

|

2018

|

vol. 38

245-261

EN

The article escribes the changes in the innovative variants which appeared in the codified norm within the last century. An example of such a variant is the form zjednują, first noted in 1937 as a balanced alternate of the form zjednywam. This type of units appeared in correctness dictionaries and they competed with the primarily neutral forms. Owing to the expansiveness of the innovative variants several levels of the strength of their influence on the doublet were distinguished. The variants, which appeared in one or two dictionaries and are not noted contemporarily (e.g. the form dworka as a variant of dworku) were the weakest. The strongest were the variants which became the only ones in the contemporary times and the former do not appear or are perceived as incorrect (e.g. the form wzwierciadle displaced the form w zwierciedle). An exceptional example in the group of innovative variants where those which were primarily noted as incorrect and in the course of the codified norm evolution obtained the status of correct forms (e.g. the form romansy, rżnąć). Sometimes they were so expansive that the former variants became recessive (e.g. powątpiewać o czymś) or are no longer noted (e.g. porznąć).

2

Является ли русский язык плюрицентрическим?

85%

Shaibakova D.

Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski

|

2016

|

vol. 2

257-268

EN

Discourses of Russian language qualification in new conditions of disintegration are offered in this article. It is stated that the terminology of a modem social Russistics is insufficient: the Soviet period terms are becoming less sufficient and satisfy new require- ments less, and definitions of Western science haven’t been fully accepted yet. The adequate designation searches result in lexical redundancy. However, semantic insufficiency leads to growth of the terminological system. In recent years the Russian language has increasingly frequently qualified as a pluricentric language because of an accumulation of differential features of three kinds of the Russian language: in the ancestral territory, in Post-Soviet countries, and in foreign countries. The situation of corresponding methods are applied to analyse each of of them. The term “pluricentric language” came from Western science and is not common in Russian-speaking discourse. But now such qualification is the most suitable.

3

Z zagadnień opisu leksykograficznego polskiej terminologii prawosławnej – wariantywność wyrazów hasłowych

85%

Citko L.

Studia Wschodniosłowiańskie

|

2022

|

vol. 22

181-190

EN

The article is devoted to the problems of variationality in the lexicographic description of the terms of Polish Orthodoxy. On the basis of existing definitions of linguistic variants and keyword variants, the variants of words forming entries in the Dictionary of Polish Orthodox Terminology are discussed. The dictionary was compiled by a team of theologians and linguists at the Faculty of Philology of the University of Bialystok. The analysis of the source material shows that the variant nature of the terms is revealed at the phonetic, inflectional and word-formation levels. These phenomena are a manifestation of the richness of the Orthodox lexicon, genetically diverse and documenting the multiplicity of ways of borrowing the terms that make it up (Greek, Old Church Slavonic, East Slavic languages, Polish).

4

Status i granice normy językowej w świetle lingwistyki funkcjonalnej

57%

Kiklewicz A.

Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego

|

2017

|

vol. 73

65-80

PL

Przedmiotem artykułu jest norma językowa w ujęciu lingwistyki funkcjonalnej. Norma jest traktowana jako zjawisko ambiwalentne, któremu przysługuje zarówno arbitralność, jak i funkcjonalność (adaptacyjny charakter). Za cechy funkcjonalne jednostek normatywnych uznaje się m.in. izomorfizm planu treści i planu formy, jak również minimalizację form alternatywnych. Z punktu widzenia lingwistyki funkcjonalnej norma stanowi jedno ze znaczeń funkcji stylistycznej jednostek językowych (krytycznie ocenia się natomiast substancjalne ujęcie normy). Osobno jest uwzględniany zakres określenia i zakres znaczenia tej funkcji. Do opisu normy, a przede wszystkim jej dywersyfikacji służą cztery parametry: aksjologiczny, desygnacyjny, habitualny i funkcjonalny. Pozwala to na przedstawienie kilku poziomów substandaryzacji normy językowej.

XX

The article discusses language norm from the perspective of functional linguistics. Language norm is treated as an ambivalent phenomenon, which is characterized by arbitrariness as well as by functionality (adaptability). The author considers the isomorphism of the content plan and the form plan as well as the minimization of the alternative forms to be the functional qualities of normative units. From the point of view of functional linguistics, language norm is one of the meanings of the stylistic function of linguistic units (the substantive interpretation of the norm is treated critically). The scope of definition and the scope of meaning of the normative function are treated separately. Four parameters: axiological, designative, habitual and functional, are used in the description and, most of all, diversification of language norm. This allows to present several levels of the substandardization of language norm.

Refine search results

1 Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego

1 Polonica

1 Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski

1 Studia Wschodniosłowiańskie

1 Citko L.

1 Kiklewicz A.

1 Shaibakova D.

1 Zbróg P.

1 2022

1 2018

1 2017

1 2016

Wariancja innowacyjna w normie skodyfikowanej w ostatnich stu latach rozwoju polszczyzny

Является ли русский язык плюрицентрическим?

Z zagadnień opisu leksykograficznego polskiej terminologii prawosławnej – wariantywność wyrazów hasłowych

Status i granice normy językowej w świetle lingwistyki funkcjonalnej