Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  legal Chinese
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Mediation in Different Areas of Chinese Legal Reality – Parametrisation of Selected Terminology

100%
Nowak-Michalska J.
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
|
2016
|
vol. 45
|
issue 1
175-186
EN
The paper deals with terminological issues in legal translation. The author has researched the process of establishing equivalents for partially equivalent terminology, using the parametrical approach to legal translation. The research consists of the terminological analysis of the texts of mediation regulations formulated in Chinese and Polish. The objective was to establish translational equivalents in the case of significant differences between the legal systems of the above mentioned linguistic area. The research was financed from the research grant no. 2012/07/E/HS2/00678, titled: Parameterisation of legilinguistic translatology in the scope of civil law and civil procedure awarded by the National Science Centre of the Republic of Poland (Sonata Bis program). Determining the acceptability of functional equivalents in the selected linguistic area is possible by comparison of their semantics with the legal structure in different legal systems and cultures. The author investigates if attributing properties from dimensions relevant in translation to mediation law terms can be helpful in the process of translation.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

PRAWA UŻYTKOWANIA I SŁUŻEBNOŚCI W POLSCE I W CHINACH

51%
SKORUPSKA P.
Comparative Legilinguistics
|
2015
|
vol. 22
25-42
EN
In this paper the terminology concerning the usufruct and easement in Poland and China was compared. The research material was the second book of the Polish Civil Code (promulgated on 23th April 1965) and the Chinese Property Rights Law (promulgated on 16th March 2007). To conduct the study the method of comparison of comparable texts was applied. In many cases it is possible to use functional equivalents from legal acts for examined terms. However, some terms have different ranges of meaning or the terms are non-equivalent and then applying, for instance, descriptive equivalents, is necessary.
PL
W artykule porównana została terminologia dotycząca użytkowania oraz służebności w Polsce i w Chinach. Materiał badawczy stanowiła księga druga ustawy z dn. 23 kwietnia 1964 r. – Kodeks cywilny (Dz. U. z 1964 r. Nr 16, poz. 93) oraz 中华人民共和国物权法, Zhōnghuá rénmín gònghéguó wùquánfǎ – Ustawa o prawach rzeczowych Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej, ogłoszona dekretem Prezydenta ChRL nr 62 z dn. 16 marca 2007 r. Do przeprowadzenia badania zastosowana została metoda analizy tekstów porównywalnych. Dla badanych terminów w wielu przypadkach użyć można ekwiwalentów funkcjonalnych, które odnaleźć można w ustawach. Niektóre terminy mają jednak różny zakres znaczeniowy, bądź są to terminy bezekwiwalentowe i konieczne jest zastosowanie m.in. ekwiwalentów opisowych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.