Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  legal luck
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article presents the issue of moral luck and some of its consequences for the philosophy of law, social justice, political responsibility and some religious concepts. Recognition of the role of moral luck undermines the use of the concept of moral responsibility, guilt and merit. The consequences of recognizing that this challenge is justifi ed, reach those areas. They postulate, for example, the need to compensate social or property inequalities, insofar as they depend on the luck. Similarly, in the Christian concept of salvation as dependent off the will of God and man, there is the problem of the impact of luck. Release from moral responsibility for actions under the infl uence of luck, also puts into question the responsibility of politicians, whose decisions are often made in the absence of certainty.
Diametros
|
2014
|
issue 41
56-76
PL
Artykuł ma za zadanie wprowadzenie do problematyki prawnego trafu i wyznaczenie ścieżki dalszych badań związanych z tym tematem. Zawiera on odpowiedź na pytanie dotyczące relacji pomiędzy moralnym trafem (moral luck), a prawnym trafem (legal luck). Analizowane są trzy stanowiska. Pierwsze, reprezentowane przez Arthura Ripsteina, głosi, że moral luck i legal luck to autonomiczne względem siebie problemy. Drugie, którego przedstawicielem jest David Enoch, stanowi, że prawny traf to wynik przeniesienia moralnego trafu na grunt prawa. Trzecie zaś, prze-ciwnie, odnosi się do koncepcji moralnego trafu jako wyniku przeniesienia prawnego trafu na grunt moralności. Autor omawia poszczególne koncepcje, wskazuje na ich mocne i słabe punkty, by ostatecznie opowiedzieć się za jedną z nich, co prowadzi do określonej wizji dalszych badań nad prawnym trafem.
EN
The article aims to introduce the issue of legal luck and set the direction for further research on this topic. It contains an answer to the question about the relationship between moral luck and legal luck. Three positions are analyzed. The first one, represented by Arthur Ripstein, says that moral luck and legal luck are autonomous issues. The second one, represented by David Enoch, states that legal luck is the result of applying moral luck to law. The third one, on the contrary, refers to the concept of moral luck as a result of applying legal luck to morality. The author discusses diverse conceptions, indicating their strong and weak points, and finally opts for one of them, which leads to a certain view of further research on legal luck.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.