Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  legal obligation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article is devoted to a semantic analysis of the prohibition on executing a disposition which is imposed on a debtor who appears in an enforcement proceeding as a subject keeping an account of a debtor’s dematerialized securities. The author analyzes the Code of Civil Procedure and Trading in the Financial Instruments Act in order to identify the legal meaning of the word ‚disposition’. To this end, the author compares the obtained results with the meaning of the word in the vernacular, colloquial language andthe specific language used by brokers. Then, based on the findings, the author explains the functioning of the prohibition to execute a disposition in selected situations which may occur at that stage of the manner of enforcement. It has been found that the obliged entity follows the notification of seizure until the dispositions have been enforced. After that moment, for each disposition, a proper evaluation of the notification of seizure is not possible.
PL
The article is devoted to a semantic analysis of the prohibition on executing a disposition which is imposed on a debtor who appears in an enforcement proceeding as a subject keeping an account of a debtor’s dematerialized securities. The author analyzes the Code of Civil Procedure and Trading in the Financial Instruments Act in order to identify the legal meaning of the word ‚disposition’. To this end, the author compares the obtained results with the meaning of the word in the vernacular, colloquial language and the specific language used by brokers. Then, based on the findings, the author explains the functioning of the prohibition to execute a disposition in selected situations which may occur at that stage of the manner of enforcement. It has been found that the obliged entity follows the notification of seizure until the dispositions have been enforced. After that moment, for each disposition, a proper evaluation of the notification of seizure is not possible.
EN
eporting a crime is a mutual obligation imposed by law and special regulations on both the sender and the recipient of the infor-mation. The obligation of both parties, i.e. the reporter and the reportee, to act synergistically is aimed at eliminating the risk of inaction of law enforce-ment agencies or some kind of social consent to break the law. It is notewor-thy that the person reporting a crime is not obliged to check the accuracy of the information, as this information does not have to be objectively true, although it should be factually correct. However, there are some concerns about accepting a report of a crime and the interrogation of the reporter as a witness in a situation where a police offi cer has a justifi ed suspicion that the reporter is under the infl uence of alcohol, intoxicants, or psychotropic or psychoactive drugs. In such a situation, is it necessary to verify the state of sobriety, and is there any legal basis at all for checking the state of sobriety of such a person? Can such a person be instructed about his/her rights and obligations, and what is the responsibility of such a person in accordanc with Article 233 § 1, Article 233 § 1a and Articles 234 and 238 of the Polish Criminal Code, Act of 6 June 1997? At the beginning, it is worth noting that there is an inconsistency in the position of the judicature and the doctrine on the issue of interrogating people who are in a state of intoxication. The reason for the above should be found in the fact that the legislator did not make a fi rm decision on the admissibility of an interrogation of a person who is intoxicated or under the infl uence of another similarly acting substance by a procedural authority.The aim of this article is to fi nd the answer to the aforementioned questions and to discuss the issue of the adoption of a notifi cation of a crime with respect to the proper performance of the duties by a police officer.
EN
The article presents an overview of selected legal solutions in Poland – in the field of preventive vaccination, considered as an important element to ensure the health security of people vaccinated as well as the entire population. Analysis of existing legislation and jurisprudence, qualified under medical law, is backed up with available statistical data and practical observations from the author's professional experience. Presented issues are seen from the perspective of the patient and his safety as a public health category. This area of ​​responsibility of the state is of particular importance for shaping patient attitudes, approving or denying vaccination. This is especially true of parents' attitudes towards vaccination of children.
PL
Artykuł prezentuje przegląd wybranych rozwiązań prawnych w obszarze szczepień ochronnych, uznanych za istotny element zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa zdrowotnego osób poddawanych szczepieniu, jak i całej populacji. Analiza obowiązującego ustawodawstwa i orzecznictwa sądowego, kwalifikowanego w ramach prawa medycznego, poparta jest dostępnymi danymi statystycznymi i obserwacjami praktycznymi, płynącymi z doświadczenia zawodowego autora. Prezentowane zagadnienia ujmowane są z perspektywy pacjenta i jego bezpieczeństwa jako kategorii zdrowia publicznego. Ten obszar odpowiedzialności państwa ma szczególne znaczenie dla kształtowania postaw pacjentów, aprobujących lub negujących szczepienia ochronne. Dotyczy to przede wszystkim postaw rodziców względem szczepień dzieci.
EN
Democracy, rule of law and human rights are addressed by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the Council of Europe and the European Union. Nonetheless, while the Council of Europe and the European Union develop their own legal regimes and ensue legal standards for democracy, the rule of law and human rights, the OSCE generally operates in politics and political standards pertinent to these values. However, by their very nature and definition, OSCE policy commitments are reflected in legal context, being transpired to legally binding European and international treaties. A situation hence unfolds in which a non-binding act contains content that binds beyond it. The nature of the activities of the OSCE institutions complements and corresponds to the ‘soft’ nature of the OSCE’s obligations, which is reflected in the non-authoritarian activities of these institutions: notably monitoring, formulating findings, follow-up, work of experts and reporting. This contributes to consistent relationship between the nature of OSCE commitments and the nature of the activities of its institutions.
PL
Demokracja, rządy prawa i prawa człowieka stanowią wspólny obszar aktywności Organizacji Bezpieczeństwa i Współpracy w Europie, Rady Europy oraz Unii Europejskiej. O ile jednak Rada Europy i Unia Europejska tworzą własne reżimy prawne a w konsekwencji prawne standardy demokracji, praworządności i praw człowieka, to OBWE zasadniczo operuje w obszarze polityki i politycznych standardów dotyczących w/w wartości. Z założenia i charakteru polityczne zobowiązania OBWE doznają jednak pewnego prawnego refleksu za sprawą ich powielania na gruncie prawnie wiążących, europejskich i międzynarodowych traktatów. Powstaje zatem sytuacja, w której akt pozbawiony prawnie wiążącej mocy zawiera treści, które poza nim moc taką posiadają. Dopełniająco, charakter działań instytucji OBWE koresponduje z „miękkim” charakterem zobowiązań tej organizacji, co znajduje wyraz w niestanowczych, a konkretnie monitorujących, wnioskowych, przeglądowych, eksperckich i sprawozdawczych działaniach tych instytucji. Zatem relację między charakterem zobowiązań OBWE a charakterem działań jej instytucji cechuje spójność.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.