Assessment of judges in itself is one of the criteria in relation to the establishment of specific rules for the career of judges, creation of a healthy judicial system and a proper one. Professional Assessment process of judges based on objective, clear and transparent criteria, has a great importance for the consolidation of judicial power, because on its base, transfer and promotions of judges are performed only on the basis of individual merit. Considering the fact that the approximation of the Albanian legislation with the European one, has become a task of the Albanian legislator, the draft “On the evaluation system of judicial activity in RA” deserves special attention.This article takes in a comparative analysis the current law “On the individual assessment of judges in Albania” and the draft law “On the evaluation system of judicial activity in RA”. The main attention of the analysis focuses on some basic elements for evaluation of the judges, pointing to some basic procedures relevant and necessary in relation to the performance and their role in the process of administering justice in our country. In the analysis of this draft law we will mainly focus on the establishment of procedures, principles and criteria for professional and ethical assessment of the judges of courts of first instance and courts of appeal that predicts the draftlaw. In the following the article is focused on a comparative view of the assessment criteria, according to the Italian model. Analysis of the Italian system of individual assessment of judges may highlight on some the practical aspects of the most suitable model of assessment to be implemented in Albania.
The author provides an analysis of the issue who should be competent to the notification of the parliamentarian draft bills. The article examines meaning of the notification in different areas of law, particularly international and European Union law. Apart from general remarks on the meaning of notification in the context of principle of loyalty, the analysis shows the character of this institution in connection with the consequences of a breach of the due notification. The author focuses on three main types of the procedure of the notification: notification of the state aid, notification of the technical standards and regulations and notification of the draft legislative provisions falling within the European Central Bank’s field of competence. The analysis shows that there is no complex regulation in polish system of law according to the notification procedure. Due to the need to avoid the problems associated with the breach of the due notification author presents his view on the issue who should notify the parliamentarian draft bills and puts forward a number of arguments supporting the conception of the significant role of the sponsor of the bill in procedure of notification.
The article discusses the problem of familiar features of the proceedings in default in Roman law (especially in Justinian’s law) and the medieval canon law. The starting point of this analysis is can. 40 of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215). The undertaken study has shown that the reception of Roman legal solution by the legal system of the Church was not only mechanical, but it was also situated in the context of adapting ancient legal provisions to the doctrinal needs of the Christianity.
PL
W artykule zostały przedstawione cechy wspólne postępowania zaocznego w prawie rzymskim (w szczególności w epoce prawa justyniańskiego) oraz prawie kanonicznym epoki średniowiecza. Punktem wyjścia dla prowadzenia rozważań był kan. 40 IV Soboru Laterańskiego (1215 r.). Przeprowadzona analiza wykazała, iż recepcja rzymskich rozwiązań przez kościelny porządek prawny nie była jedynie działaniem mechanicznym, lecz sytuowana była także w perspektywie dostosowania starożytnych mechanizmów prawnych do wymogów doktryny chrześcijańskiej.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.