Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  lie detection
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Detekce lži na základě neverbálních projevů – studie zaměstnanců Policie České republiky

100%
Boukalová H., Mynaříková L.
Psychologie a její kontexty
|
2014
|
vol. 5
|
issue 2
33-46
EN
Lie detection based on nonverbal behavior is not a standard method, it is an intuitive process, applied by lay persons, but also professionals. Some of the major sources (e.g. widespread Interrogation Manual by F. Inbau et al., 2004) offer clear recommendations about the nonverbal behavior of liars to investigators of serious crime. These findings are not supported by the research, moreover they can lead to lowering the ability to detect lie (Blair, Kooi 2004). Another topic is mapping the skills of professionals (police officers, members of the secret services) and non-specialists to detect lies by nonverbal signs. Across the studies (with few exceptions) a low performance in the task of detecting lies by nonverbal expressions (Ekman P., 1996; Vrij, 2004 and others) is found. The levels of success are usually around the level of chance. The potential reasons for such results are analyzed (e.g. Blair, Kooi, 2004). However a group of psychologists led by P. Ekman and M. O'Sullivan (O'Sullivan, 2007) managed to find in their years lasting research a group of people whose ability to detect lies is well above the population average. This group is diverse in terms of age, interests and professions, all of them come from the USA. There were certain common features found in this group and also a focus on similar phenomena in the detection of lying. The main goal and research question is to find out: what is the success rate of differentiation between lies and truths in this specific professional group of Czech population, is it the same or different from the results reported in the context of available resources. The research will focus on the ability of respondents to determine the truth or deceit on the basis of non-verbal and paraverbal expressions of observed subjects, with focus on specific professional groups - mainly police workers. We assume, that the police officers are frequently in the contact with people, who are not willing to reveal critical information or who are motivated to lie. The procedure: The material consisted of short video sections originating from real investigation of serious crime. After the pilot study the stimuli material has been created consisting of 21 video-sections lasting 30 seconds, the sound of the videos was filtered, so the paraverbal characteristics were maintained, but the content of the speech was unclear. The research sample consisted of 197 police officers from 5 departments. Selected results: The TRUTH detection accuracy - (the accuracy of correct evaluation of the truth-telling people on the video) was situated between 0,25 (25%) to 0,75 (75%). The LIE detection accuracy - was situated between 0,44 (44%) to 1 (100%). The overall accuracy (means combined accuracy of lie and truth detection) was situated between 0,33 (33%) and 0.86 (86%). 5 respondents obtained results, that were above the average of the group in all the three categories (truth, lie, overall). The discussion: The results indicate that (among others) we can find so called lie bias among the police workers, which is common in the similar professional settings and it involves higher expectations of lie and deceit on the side of the communication partner. In the common population the opposite tendency - so called truth bias - tendency to evaluate others (situations, behavior, statements) as truthful is found. The study managed to find police workers, who obtained better results than guessing and also better than the average of the tested group. The main limit of the study is probably the lack of repeated retest of the sample. This and other findings were involved into the police training focused on communication and lie during criminal investigation, which is not systematic in Czech Republic. The plan is to test also other professional groups in the future.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Detekcja kłamstwa - czyli czego?

75%
Widacki J., Dukała K.
Problemy Kryminalistyki
|
2015
|
issue 287
3-16, 61-74
PL
Artykuł poświęcony jest zagadnieniu metod "wykrywania kłamstwa w kryminalistyce i psychologii sądowej. Szczegółowo opisane są kwestie filozoficzne, językowe i psychologiczne związane z pojęciem kłamstwa. Przybliżone są metody potocznie określane jako "służące detekcji kłamstwa" wraz z dokładną analizą przedmiotu ich detekcji oraz zakresu użyteczności w praktyce. W artykule poruszone są również kwestie wiarygodności psychologicznej świadka i zeznania.
EN
The article discusses the issue of methods of "lie detection" in criminology and forensic psychology. Considerations are described in detail philosophical, linguistic and psychological associated with the concept lies. Approximate methods are commonly referred to as "used to detect lies" along with a thorough analysis of the subject of their detectionand usability in practice. The article raised issues of credibility are also psychological and witness testimony.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Essentials of the Relevant Issue Gravity (RIG) Strength: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Comparison Question Test (CQT)

75%
Ginton A.
European Polygraph
|
2019
|
vol. 13
|
issue 4(50)
181-201
EN
The essentials of the Relevant Issue Gravity (RIG) theoretical framework for explaining the Comparison Question Test (CQT) (Ginton, 2009), is presented here in a detailed outline format. It is based on the notion that examinees who lie on the test in the relevant questions are attached psychologically to the relevant issue in a different way than the truth-tellers. An essential difference is the strength by which the suspect’s attention is directed, focused, and bound to the relevant issue. These aspects of attention in the context of polygraph examinations are coined, Relevant Issue Gravity (RIG) Strength. Th e RIG strength is assumed to distribute differently between the liars and the truth-tellers. There is reason to believe that liars hold a stronger RIG compared to the truthful subjects, and eventually, that affects the differential reactivity to the relevant vs. comparison questions. The following describes the rationale behind the RIG concept, some supporting data, and the theoretical as well as practical implications.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.