Search results

1

Portret Herodota w świetle traktatu De Herodoti malignitate Plutarcha z Cheronei

100%

Marchewka A.

ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal

|

2017

|

vol. 7

|

issue 2

233-246

PL

Portrait of Herodotus in the light of Plutarch’s treatise De Herodoti malignitate As a Platonist and moralist Plutarch paid particular attention truth. No wonder that in his reference to Herodotus’ Histories he took into consideration the issue of historical truth, which was for him very important - both in its ethical as well as didactic aspect. In his De Herodoti malignitate the Chaeronean moralist is concerned with truth as well as with offering moral uplift. Plutarch presents Herodotus as a perfidious liar who falsely presented such famous and heroic Greeks as Miltiades, Leonidas, Themistocles or Pausanias and - above all - depreciatingly treated the Boeotians and Corinthians. Moreover, Plutarch accuses the historian of Halicarnassus of being malicious (κακοήθεια). For him Herodotus’ lies were deliberate and slandering. Herodotus was also a blasphemer, a pro-barbarian historian; a man who disregarded women. Finally, we get the Plutarchan portrait of Herodotus himself as a blunt barbarian (ὁ ἔσχατος Καρῶν). Such a presentation of Herodotus seems to attest to Plutarch’s own prejudices, if not wickedness. By the same, however, one must take into consideration the literary tradition in which the whole treatise is rooted. So De Herodoti malignitate contains features of historical polemics and is an example of judicial rhetoric, in which the biographer attempts at persuading his readers that his charges against Herodotus are well justified. The treatise is a work representing the new intellectual trend, the so-called Second Sophistic; a polemic written in a period when the Greek intellectuals were deeply engaged in taking issues with past writers. Moreover, a fundamental aspect of De Herodoti malignitate should be taken into account - truth which is analyzed from a moral and psychological perspective. Although a leading motif of the treatise is truthfulness, the direct subject-matter of Plutarch’s considerations remains a lie, or - to put it exactly - lying. Accordingly, the Boeotian moralist singles out and analyses all the fundamental forms of lying. A suitable interpretation of the treatise De Herodoti malignitate depends thus on our knowledge of the cultural distance between Herodotus and Plutarch, although both authors were the representatives of Greek prosa.

2

Granica pomiędzy dokuczaniem a przestępstwem stalkingu oraz innymi typami czynów zabronionych

94%

Kluza J.

Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny

|

2019

|

vol. 81

|

issue 1

129-141

EN

The article presents issues associated with determining the relationship between the offences specified in Article 107 of the Code of Misdemeanors and the crime of stalking from Article 190a § 1 of the Penal Code, and other types of crimes characterized by the violation of the mental peace of the victim. These acts intersect each other, and the borderline between them is determined primarily by the intensity of the perpetrator’s actions.

PL

Artykuł przedstawia problematykę związaną z określeniem relacji, w jakiej pozostają w stosunku do siebie wykroczenie określone w art. 107 Kodeksu wykroczeń i przestępstwo stalkingu z art. 190a § 1 Kodeksu karnego oraz inne typy przestępstw cechujących się naruszeniem spokoju psychicznego pokrzywdzonego. Czyny te pozostają w stosunku krzyżowania, a granicę pomiędzy nimi wyznacza przede wszystkim intensywność działania sprawcy.

3

Über das verbotene Lachen

51%

Stillmark H.-C.

Transfer. Reception studies

|

2020

|

vol. 5

27-38

PL

Tematem eseju jest specyficzna sytuacja komunikacyjna powstała w wyniku wybuchu niedającego się stłumić śmiechu w zakazanych kontekstach. Doświadczenie z dzieciń-stwa stało się okazją do refleksji nad uwikłaniem komunikacyjnym zakazanego śmiechu. Jednocześnie podjęta została próba charakterystyki śmiechu jako specyficznego systemu znaków służących komunikacji oraz jako aktu czysto cielesnego.

EN

The essay explores the question of what happens in forbidden contexts when laughter cannot be suppressed. A childhood experience is the occasion to reflect on the communicative relations of forbidden laughter. Laughter is pointed out as a special communica-tive sign system and physical act.

DE

Der Essay geht der Frage nach, was passiert, wenn das Lachen in verbotenen Kon-texten sich nicht unterdrücken lässt. Ein Kindheitserleben ist der Anlass über die kommunikativen Verhältnisse des verbotenen Lachens nachzudenken. Es wird dabei auf das Lachen als ein besonderes kommunikatives Zeichensystem und körperliches Ereignis hingewiesen.

Refine search results

1 ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal

1 Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny

1 Transfer. Reception studies

1 Kluza J.

1 Marchewka A.

1 Stillmark H.-C.

1 2020

1 2019

1 2017

Portret Herodota w świetle traktatu De Herodoti malignitate Plutarcha z Cheronei

Granica pomiędzy dokuczaniem a przestępstwem stalkingu oraz innymi typami czynów zabronionych

Über das verbotene Lachen