Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  methodological atheism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Methodological Ludism as a Cognition-Denying Paradigm

100%
Bubnov E.
Dialogue and Universalism
|
2017
|
issue 2
57-66
EN
The article attempts to analyze methodological ludism—an approach developed by André Droogers, a Dutch scholar studying religion. Droogers relies on Johan Huizinga’s conception claiming that culture (and, consequently, science) is of game-like nature. Game as a methodological principle has two levels: noumenal and phenomenal. The supposition is stated that at the noumenal level (the designatum level) ludism coincides with pantheism. At the phenomenal level (the signifier level) methodological ludism may be compared with its parts: methodological atheism, methodological agnosticism, and methodological theism; also, these components may be compared with one another.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

„Podwójna gra”. O przydatności koncepcji NOMA w socjologii religii

72%
Rogińska M.
Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
|
2014
|
vol. 50
|
issue 2(200)
89-103
PL
Artykuł jest poświęcony poznawczej sytuacji wierzącego badacza religii, którego przynależność zarówno do świata nauki, jak i do świata wiary, Peter Berger nazywa podwójnym obywatelstwem, zaś Pierre Bourdieu podwójną grą. Autor zastanawia się, czy do sytuacji tej można zastosować koncepcję rozłącznych obszarów dociekań (ang. non-overlaping magisteria, NOMA), która powstała jako model współistnienia religii i nauk przyrodniczych.
EN
The objective of this paper is to analyze the situation of a believing sociologist of religion. It is her affiliation to the both scientific and religious world that Peter Berger calls “the dual citizenship” and Pierre Bourdieu – “the double game”. The author investigates whether the non-overlaping magisteria (NOMA) concept proposed by Stephen Gould as a model of coexistence of religion and natural sciences can be applied to the situation of the social researcher of religion.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.