Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: mutual concessions

Sort By:

Limit search:

Ugoda – lepszy sposób rozwiązania sporu?

100%

Biały A.

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

2017

issue 19

W czasach współczesnych, w których kładzie się bardzo duży nacisk na rozwój alternatywnych metod rozwiązywania sporów, dążenia do wykorzystywania w praktyce sądownictwa polubownego i mediacji, zagadnienia i wątpliwości związane z umową ugody stają się coraz bardziej aktualne. W związku z tym, konieczne staje się dokonanie oceny poglądów już wypracowanych, a związanych z tą tematyką oraz zwrócenie uwagi na zmiany, które w ostatnich latach wywarły istotny wpływ na zawieranie ugód, co jednocześnie pozwoli na sformułowanie wniosków w zakresie rzeczywistego stosowania umów tego typu w obrocie prawnym i gospodarczym.

The very wide range of legal relationships which makes a possibility to conclude a settlement shows its great importance in practice. Similarly, it is necessary to assess the need for its dissemination, not only in court proceedings, because the amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties plays a very positive role. The parties to an out-of-court or court settlement have a sense of resolving the dispute, which is not settle by the third party. In this way, the parties have a possibility to create their own legal position and situation. In conclusion, it should be noted, that despite a number of doubts about how to deal with the practical application of Art. 917 k.c. and art. 918, the settlement agreement fulfills its essential functions, is a better way to resolve a dispute than to remain in the dispute or refer the case to court.

Aktualne problemy postępowania pojednawczego

80%

Ciesliński M. M.

Studia Iuridica

2018

vol. 75

19-29

The text refers to the evolution and problems with interpretation of provisions of conciliatory court proceeding in Polish law. Conciliatory court proceeding is regulated by articles 184–186 KPC (The Civil Proceedings Code). Author considers the role of that institution and indicates that although there was not many amendments in above provision of law there was some important court decision relating to this proceeding. Also views of doctrine is still developing. Contemporary conciliatory court proceeding can be used to the all cases that could be terminated by agreement also these that are non-litigious proceedings. It should be noticed that in practice the main role of the conciliatory court proceedings is to interrupt the limitation period. However part of the subjects in civil procedure use the institution contrary to law. They are not interested in agreement but they want only to interrupt the limitation period multiple time to keep their claim. Such way of using conciliatory court proceeding should be treated as abuse of law. Author also shows how important is right classification of conciliatory court proceeding. It can even influence the proper learning process at University. Finally there are presented proposed amendments in law prepared in Government’s Draft of 27th November 2017 relating to the conciliatory court proceeding. Author assumes that conclusion of agreement in conciliatory court proceeding is proper way to finish dispute between the parties. It gives possibility to reduce costs, time and even make people to forget and reconcile animosity.

Refine search results

1 Acta Iuris Stetinensis

1 Studia Iuridica

1 Biały A.

1 Ciesliński M. M.

1 2018

1 2017

Search results

Ugoda – lepszy sposób rozwiązania sporu?

Aktualne problemy postępowania pojednawczego