Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  new phenomenology
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Kilka uwag o pojęciu epoche i redukcji w fenomenologii

100%
Drwięga M.
Kwartalnik Filozoficzny
|
2022
|
vol. 50
|
issue 1-4
67-89
EN
In the article “Remarks on the concepts of epochē and reduction in phenomenology” the author would like to draw readers’ attention to a fundamental issue of phenomenology: the relationship between epochē and reduction. These two concepts play a key role in both classical and modern phenomenology. In fact, the history of phenomenology can be viewed from the perspective of the evolution of these concepts, starting with Husserl and continuing through J. Patočka and R. Ingarden, all the way to their contemporary versions provided by the new phenomenologists, such as M. Henry and R. Barbaras. The author tries to trace some of this history and of the debates between the different representatives of phenomenology. The aim is twofold: on the one hand, to explain the meaning and role played by these two concepts, and, on the other, to show how their application is related to the development of phenomenology itself, from Husserl to the present day.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Fenomenologia i twarz innego. Kontrowersje wokół Lévinasa

84%
Drwięga M.
Logos i Ethos
|
2019
|
vol. 49
|
issue 1
EN
In the paper the author would like to draw readers’ attention to the discussion about the other’s face. The point of reference is the philosophy of E. Lévinas. The French philosopher considered himself a phenomenologist, but if so, someone may ask: what kind of phenomenology is it? and how should be the phenomenon understood? These questions led to a vivid discussion. On the one hand, there is D. Janicaud who severely criticized Lévinas for having made “a theological turn” and thus for having abandoned phenomenology for theology. On the other hand, J.-L. Marion tried to reformulate the Lévinas central idea of the other’s face in a language of the new phenomenology. In the paper the author first presents the position of Lévinas about phenomenology, then goes into critical arguments and discuss them, finally he tries to reformulate in the new way the phenomenon of the other’s face, it means in terms of J.-L. Marion’s new phenomenology.
PL
W artykule podejmuję dyskusję dotyczącą twarzy innego. Punktem odniesienia będą poglądy E. Lévinasa, który uważał się za fenomenologa. Powstaje pytanie: jakiego rodzaju jest to fenomenologia? Jak rozumieć fenomen? Pytania te wywołały żywą dyskusję. Z jednej strony spotkały się one z krytyką. D. Janicaud zarzuca Lévinasowi „teologiczny zwrot” i porzucenie fenomenologii na rzecz teologii. Z drugiej J. L. Marion stara się przeformułować analizy Lévinasa w duchu nowej fenomenologii. W mojej argumentacji przedstawię najpierw poglądy Lévinasa dotyczące fenomenologii, następnie uwagi krytyczne pod jego adresem, by w końcowej części artykułu ująć fenomen twarzy w języku nowej fenomenologii.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.