Search results

1

Obowiązek informowania pracowników o warunkach zatrudnienia w świetle nowej unijnej dyrektywy 2019/1152

100%

Nowak M.

Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne

|

2021

|

issue 6

27-40

EN

This article deals with the obligation to inform workers about working conditions under the new EU Directive on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union. The author points to the purpose of the new directive, but focuses primarily on the amendments made to the new Directive in relation to Directive 91/53 EEC. The article presents the purpose, subject matter and scope of application of the directive and how the obligation indicated in the title is to be implemented. The article also provides an overall assessment of Polish law from this perspective.

PL

Artykuł dotyczy obowiązku informowania pracownika o warunkach zatrudnienia wynikającego z nowej dyrektywy unijnej w sprawie przejrzystych i przewidywalnych warunków pracy w UE. Autorka wskazuje na cel wydania nowej dyrektywy, ale przede wszystkim koncentruje uwagę na zmianach, jakie zostały w niej wprowadzone w porównaniu z rozwiązaniami przyjętymi w omawianym zakresie w obowiązującej jeszcze dyrektywie 91/53/EWG, biorąc pod uwagę zakres podmiotowy, przedmiotowy oraz sposób realizacji tytułowego obowiązku. W artykule podjęto również próbę wstępnej, ogólnej oceny przepisów prawa polskiego z tej perspektywy

2

Substantive and Procedural Issues of Cement Sector Investigations in Turkey

84%

Stakheyeva H., Canbolat E.

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

|

2017

|

vol. 10(16)

205-226

EN

In 2016, the Turkish Competition Authority (hereinafter, TCA) published the Cement Sector Inquiry Report (hereinafter, Cement Sector Report) following more than two years of market analysis. One of the reasons for conducting such a market inquiry was the fact that the implementation of competition rules and accuracy of the economic analysis by the TCA in cement cases were frequently criticized. In order to provide some guidance and have better understanding about the competitive dynamics of the cement market, the TCA initiated the inquiry in 2014. Another reason for the inquiry was the importance of the cement industry for the construction sector and the economy of Turkey, as well as numerous competition law concerns in this sector. The article provides an analysis of the substantive and procedural issues in the TCA activity in the cement sector in Turkey. Particular emphasis is placed on the assessment of the Cement Sector Report and common competition law violations in the sector in Turkey based on a review of the decisions of the TCA. Additionally, legal grounds for conducting sector inquiries in Turkey, as well as limits to and potential impact on the TCA’s powers to issue extensive compulsory information requests (in the light of the recent CJEU’s judgements in cement cartel cases) are discussed. Overall, the article provides the reader with a better understanding of the Turkish cement sector dynamics and most common anticompetitive practices there. In conclusion, it is argued that inspite of having a reputation of a “problematic sector”, the behaviour of cement producers and developments in the cement market in Turkey may be justified by economic reasons and the oligopolistic nature of this market.

3

Wstrzymanie dostaw energii elektrycznej z powodu zaległości po stronie odbiorcy a obowiązek informacyjny przedsiębiorcy

73%

Szanciło T.

Studia Prawnicze

|

2016

|

issue 3 (207)

129-147

EN

The suspension of energy supply is one of the farthest-reaching powers of energy entrepreneur with whom a recipient had signed an agreement. Therefore, it is not right which can be used in every situation, but must be met certain conditions, even if the basis for suspension of supply is the lack of payment by the recipient. It may rise dispute between the trader and the recipient concerning the validity of cutting-off delivery of electricity. It is necessary to determine whether the action of the energy trader was in accordance with the law, which was preceded by all the required law actions, including whether it has been preserved obligation to provide information in relation to the contractor. It is not sufficient that the recipient is in default for a specified period of payment for energy, but must be notified in writing of its intention to terminate the contract. In addition, it must be designated an additional two-week deadline for payment of outstanding and current liabilities. It’s important to define the conditions of keeping by the operator of the energy information’s obligation, including the starting date for calculating the additional period set for payment of arrears. This raises doubt whether the principle derived from Article. 61 of the Civil Code can be applied directly to the energy law, which aims to protect recipients. This is more important that consumers more often than not are recipients of electricity, so far the weaker party of a contract for the sale and delivery of electricity.

Refine search results

1 Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne

1 Studia Prawnicze

1 Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

1 Canbolat E.

1 Nowak M.

1 Stakheyeva H.

1 Szanciło T.

1 2021

1 2017

1 2016

Obowiązek informowania pracowników o warunkach zatrudnienia w świetle nowej unijnej dyrektywy 2019/1152

Substantive and Procedural Issues of Cement Sector Investigations in Turkey

Wstrzymanie dostaw energii elektrycznej z powodu zaległości po stronie odbiorcy a obowiązek informacyjny przedsiębiorcy