Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ocenianie w szkole wyższej
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The study presents considerations related to functions of evaluation at a university. Initial questions about the possibility of facing the tasks of evaluation in the context determined by: established assessment practices, changes related to the implementation of PRK, pedagogical theory (formative vs summation assessment) were resolved by means of a survey conducted among students. Students’ statements on, i.a., the readability of the assessing system and determining its criteria, relevance/randomness, averaging ratings in the Final Module Evaluation (OKM), processual features of evaluation, lead to the conclusion that students can appreciate the measurability of summative assessment (e.g. of test exam), but also they submit postulates to provide the verification with the features of formative assessment that supports their learning.
PL
W opracowaniu przedstawiono rozważania związane z funkcjami oceniania w uczelni wyższej. Początkowe pytania o możliwości sprostania zadaniom ewaluacji w kontekście wyznaczanym przez utrwalone praktyki oceniania, zmiany związane z wdrażaniem PRK, a także przez teorię pedagogiczną (ocenianie kształtujące vs sumujące) rozstrzygnięto za pomocą badania sondażowego przeprowadzonego wśród studentów. Ich wypowiedzi, na temat m.in. czytelności systemu oceniania i ustalania jego kryteriów, trafności/przypadkowości, uśredniania ocen w OKM oraz procesualnych cech ewaluacji, prowadzą do wniosku, że studiujący potrafią docenić mierzalność oceniania sumującego (np. egzaminów testowych), ale też zgłaszają postulaty, by wyposażyć weryfikację w cechy oceniania kształtującego, wspierającego ich uczenie się.
EN
The axis of the reflection conducted in the text is marked by questions concerning goals of assessment in higher education and real possibilities of fulfilling them in the context determined, on the one hand, by established practices of university assessment and, on the other hand, by changes pertaining to implementation of the NQF and the LLL strategy. The yardstick of the analyses, grounded in critical hermeneutics, is the pedagogical theory. In the emerging picture there dominates the logic of the technology of education, giving advantage to the systems functions of summative assessment over formative assessment, subjected to individual needs of learners. The logic is solidified, on the one hand, by the educational policy emphasizing verification of the outcomes of education and detailed documentation of this process, and, on the other hand, by seeming obviousness and impartiality of the analytical assessment strategies, easily falling under bureaucratic procedures. One of the possible consequences of such a state of affairs may become ignorance of development of social competences and more complex academic abilities, the verification of which by virtue of traditional verification methods is practically impossible, whilst possible changes in this respect require not only engagement of academic teachers but also an increase in financial outlays on higher education.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.