Search results

1

Sprzedaż komórki lokatorskiej. Polemika z artykułem Michała Kućki pt. „Jeszcze o rozporządzeniu oraz o »rozporządzeniu« pomieszczeniem przynależnym do lokalu” („Rejent” 2021, nr 3, s. 11-27)

100%

Berek M.

Rejent

|

2021

|

issue 10 (366)

22-30

EN

The article contains a polemic with the view assuming that transfer of ownership of the storage room cannot take place in the contract of sale. The author tries to present arguments supporting opposite view, that concluding this type of contracts does not lead to violation of the law, regardless of the fact that the storage room cannot be a separate object of ownership within the meaning of art. 45 of the Polish Civil Code.

2

Zakres podmiotowy spółdzielczego lokatorskiego prawa do lokalu mieszkalnego w razie ustania małżeństwa a dopuszczalność i konfiguracje uwłaszczenia - uwagi na kanwie postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Suwałkach - I Wydział Cywilny z 20.10.2020 r., I Cz 231/20

100%

Bieranowski A.

Rejent

|

2021

|

issue 2 (358)

97-108

EN

The article analyses the acquisition of ownership of premises in place of a cooperative tenant’s right to the premises and makes two interpretative conclusions. First, in the case of the spouse’s rubbish, after the divorce, the property of the premises may be acquired by the surviving former spouse. This solution is not fair. In this respect, it is necessary to make a request de lege ferenda to amend to the Act on housing cooperatives. Secondly, former spouses may acquire ownership of the premises in fractional parts.

3

Jeszcze o rozporządzaniu albo o „rozporządzaniu” pomieszczeniem przynależnym do lokalu

84%

Kućka M.

Rejent

|

2021

|

issue 3 (359)

11-27

EN

The paper covers admissibility and effects of contracts concerning “transfer” of so called adjoining rooms between owners of premises. These kind of rooms are legally considered by Polish legislator as “component parts” of appartments (when the appartments are objects of separate ownership) and therefore may not be transferred (a component part of a thing cannot be a separate object of ownership and other property rights). It is argued that these contracts lead to a change of content of ownership between owners of premises. It is possible because owners have right to modify or affect the object of their ownership (and by doinig this they modify the content of their ownership). These kind of contracts should be concluded in notarial deed and are effective only when the “acquirer” of an adjoining room is entered into land and mortgage register. It is also disputed that a “transfer” of an adjoining room leads to division of the appartment of which the room is a component. Otherwise it would lead to undesirable effects, for instance to creation of a collective mortgage (if the previous appartment from which the room was “separated”, was encumberred with a mortgage).

Refine search results

3 Rejent

1 Berek M.

1 Bieranowski A.

1 Kućka M.

3 2021

Sprzedaż komórki lokatorskiej. Polemika z artykułem Michała Kućki pt. „Jeszcze o rozporządzeniu oraz o »rozporządzeniu« pomieszczeniem przynależnym do lokalu” („Rejent” 2021, nr 3, s. 11-27)

Zakres podmiotowy spółdzielczego lokatorskiego prawa do lokalu mieszkalnego w razie ustania małżeństwa a dopuszczalność i konfiguracje uwłaszczenia - uwagi na kanwie postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Suwałkach - I Wydział Cywilny z 20.10.2020 r., I Cz 231/20

Jeszcze o rozporządzaniu albo o „rozporządzaniu” pomieszczeniem przynależnym do lokalu