Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  panopticism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

New locals or the newly-migrantized? The markers of the internally displaced populations’ visibility: the Ukraine case, 2014-2021

100%
Balinchenko S.
Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
|
2023
|
vol. 1
59-71
EN
The article analyzes internal displacement with attention to the visibility of the displaced populations in the host communities. The study is based on the Ukraine case of protracted internal displacement, during the 2014-2021 period, from the beginning of the Russo-Ukrainian war, and just before the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. It employs the methodology of Causal Layered Analysis and secondary analysis of the national survey data on internal displacement. Regarding the distortions of visibility, I suggest hypovisibility (anopticism) and hypervisibility (panopticism), through the VASE-approach that includes visibility, access to decision-making, sense of belonging, and estimation of common perspectives as the indicators of adaptation of the newcomers in the receiving communities. The visibility of the displaced populations is reviewed through the systemic and myth/metaphor levels. The labels of “burden”, “problem” or “capital” applied to the displaced populations in the narratives and official documents are referred to as a visibility-related issue that has an impact on social cohesion.
2

Controlled Freedom - the Formation of the Control Society

84%
Pongratz L.
Journal of Pedagogy
|
2011
|
vol. 2
|
issue 2
161-172
EN
My analysis develops via the following five conceptual steps. The first step links up with Foucault's analysis of techniques of ‘soft’ discipline, which relates to ‘classical’ reform pedagogy, in the transition period from the 19th to the 20th century. The second step thematises the shifts in these disciplinary techniques in the context of the crisis of the so-called ‘environments of enclosure’. Here there is a particular focus on Deleuze's arguments concerning the emergence of a modern ‘society of control’. The third step considers the specific form of the ‘government of the social’, which Foucault approaches with the concept of ‘governmentality’. The fourth step aims to show that the current educational reforms can be understood as a ‘governmental strategy’. The fifth step, finally, thematises the inconsistency of governmental practices. It pursues the possibility that such practices advance, en passant or contrary to their aims, their own contradiction: the preparedness and capacity for critical opposition.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Panoptic Vision of the World: Can a State of Emergency Become a Regular One?

67%
Kulavkova K.
Slavia Meridionalis
|
2022
|
vol. 22
PL
Przedmiotem uwagi jest kilka aspektów społecznych pandemii koronawirusa SARS-CoV-2, które mają niejednoznaczne i sprzeczne znaczenia: stan wyjątkowy / kryzys, środki nadzwyczajne, prawa obywatelskie i prawa / ograniczenia praw człowieka, wolność / ograniczenie wolności. Podstawowymi narzędziami interpretacyjnymi i pojęciowymi są terminy „panoptykon” i „panoptycyzm”, których archetypowe wzorce wskazują na systematyczne i systemowe niszczenie uniwersalnych praw człowieka do wolności i prywatności. Ta szkoda pojawia się poprzez legalizację nadzoru i kontroli obywateli, przez co staje się bardziej zbliżona do radykalnej inwigilacji. Pandemia jest postrzegana jako pretekst do odnowienia panoptycznej wizji świata. Współczesny pandemiczny nadzór nad obywatelami zaciera granice między tym, co realne, a tym, co wirtualne i tworzy nowe granice wolności na kilku poziomach: ruchu, mowy, pracy, komunikacji, egzystencji. Niektóre z tych ograniczeń praw i wolności człowieka dotyczą osób starszych. Analiza pokazuje niebezpieczeństwo przedłużenia i legalizacji środków nadzwyczajnych w sytuacji, gdy realnie nie ma stanu wyjątkowego. Powstaje pytanie: czy stan wyjątkowy może stać się stanem normalnym? New Normal ma moc tworzenia wyalienowanych jednostek i wyalienowanego społeczeństwa.
EN
The object of interpretation of this text is several social aspects of the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 pandemic which have equivocal and contradictory meanings: state of emergency/crisis, emergency measures, civil and human rights/restrictions to human rights, freedom/limitation of freedom. The basic interpretative and conceptual tools used are the terms ‘panopticon’ and ‘panopticism’, whose archetypal patterns point to systematic and systemic damage to the universal human rights to freedom and privacy. This damage occurs by legalizing the surveillance and control of citizens, thus becoming more akin to radical surveillance. The pandemic is seen as an excuse to renew the panoptic vision of the world. The contemporary pandemic surveillance of citizens dissolves the boundaries between the real and the virtual and creates new boundaries of freedom on several levels: movement, speech, work, communication, existence. Some of these limitations of human rights and freedoms relate to the elderly population. This analysis shows the danger of prolonging and legalizing emergency measures in circumstances when, realistically, there is no state of emergency. This poses a question: can a state of emergency become a regular state? The New Normal has the power to create alienated individuals and an alienated society.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.