Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  parliamentary committee
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 163a ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu

100%
Kubuj K.
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
|
2012
|
issue 2(34)
67-71
EN
In the light of Article 163a Paragraph 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland the motion to adjourn the examination of the matter by a parliamentary committee is a procedural proposal, since it concerns the conduct of the committee that is hearing the case and does not lead to a decision on the merits. Although the rules of the Parliament don’t define the issue of “postponing” of the work of parliamentary committees, the deadline for the return to the matter should be clarified in some way. In this case the request for deferral of consideration by the committee, pending the outcome of the court. Although it does not indicate a specific date, it specifies a time of return.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Tryb zwoływania posiedzeń komisji sejmowych

80%
Odrowąż-Sypniewski W.
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
|
2018
|
issue 1(57)
174-178
EN
The power of the presidium of the committee to determine the agenda of a committee sitting is limited only in two cases – a minority request to convene a sitting and an initiative of the Presidium of the Sejm. The chairperson of the committee establishes the agenda of the committee meeting only in the case in which he executes the minority’s request. No provision of the Standing Orders of the Sejm l allows the chairman of the committee to set the agenda for a committee meeting without the involvement the presidium of the committee. Producing minutes documenting a sitting of the presidium is not required, nor there are any procedural requirements regarding the rules for convening these sittings.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Opinia w sprawie uprawnień Komisji do Spraw Unii Europejskiej wynikających z art. 3 ust. 2 ustawy z 8 października 2010 r. o współpracy Rady Ministrów z Sejmem i Senatem w sprawach związanych z członkostwem Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w Unii Europejskiej

80%
Mik C.
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
|
2023
|
issue 2(78)
99-103
EN
The subject of this opinion is to discuss the powers of the European Union Affairs Committee of the Sejm addressed to the Council of Ministers under the provisions of the Treaty and the Standing Orders of the Sejm. According to the author, the Committee is entitled to request information from the representative of the Council of Ministers on the draft acts on the agenda of the European Council, whereas it may not request information on the specific position to be taken by the Prime Minister during a meeting of the European Council.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Szczegółowe rozpatrywanie projektu ustawy przez komisję (tryb modyfikacji tekstu rozpatrywanego projektu)

80%
Odrowąż-Sypniewski W.
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
|
2020
|
issue 1(65)
64-69
EN
In the author’s opinion, the following provisions (sections) of a bill project referred to committee should not become subjects of voting by the committee, but the committee should vote only on motions aimed at their modification (substantive and editorial amendments and motions for deletion of a provision). A different manner of work of the committee may lead to the deletion of a given provision, if the provision is not approved in voting, even in case of the lack of motion to delete it. The Sejm should decide upon legislative motions and legislative postulates included in the committee’s report on the bill, prepared in the form of a consolidated text.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Poselska inicjatywa ustawodawcza

51%
Myrcha A.
Polityka i Społeczeństwo
|
2022
|
vol. 20
|
issue 3
135-142
EN
This article aims to draw attention to the issue of legislative initiative concerning the powers conferred on Members. This work includes consideration of the substance of the legislative initiative as well as the parliamentary legislative initiative, in particular through the initiative of the parliamentary groups and the initiative given to the Sejm committee and the possibility of withdrawing a complex project. The author focuses primarily on the analysis of the regulations concerning the problem, which have been extended to include a broad doctrine.
PL
Artykuł ma na celu zwrócenie uwagi na zagadnienie inicjatywy ustawodawczej w kontekście uprawnień nadanych posłom. W niniejszej pracy zawarto rozważania dotyczące istoty inicjatywy ustawodawczej, jak i poselskiej inicjatywy ustawodawczej, w szczególności poprzez inicjatywę grup poselskich oraz inicjatywę przyznaną komisją sejmowym, a także możliwości wycofania złożonego projektu. Autor skupia uwagę przede wszystkim na analizie regulacji dotyczących przedmiotowego problemu, poszerzoną o liczny pogląd doktryny.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.