Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  partycypacja społeczna,
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Volunteering is an essential part of contemporary state and civic society. Through volunteering citizens significantly contribute to the social and economic development of their local communities. They expand the influence and the capacity of civil society organisations and at the same time they have the opportunity to develop their own skills. Volunteering teaches the principles of responsibilities, social solidarity, generosity and subsidiarity. It also builds social capital and creates interpersonal ties, based on cooperation. Through this it becomes the way of development of the democracy and civil society.
PL
Partycypacja społeczna to proces, który ewoluuje w swojej formie w ciągu ostatnich lat. Przykład Bostonu ukazuje, że gra komputerowa może stać się elementem wybiegającym poza świat wirtualny, dając jednocześnie możliwość nauki oraz zmiany przestrzeni. Jest to sposób na dotarcie do większej grupy odbiorców, która poznaje, zmienia i kreuje obszar w sposób nowatorski i odmienny w stosunku do powszechnie znanej formy konsultacji społecznych.
EN
The article describes the unusual form of social participation that took place in the area of Chinatown in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. In their work, the MAPC group created a game presenting that district as a scene of action. The players had to choose the perspective of a chosen character among a group of 15 available characters with various backgrounds. Then lead their virtual life and notice all the problems about the surroundings the chosen person may have in their reality. The aim of this undertaking was to encourage the young generation to stand up, analyse the area and propose a fresh view on important spatial aspects in Chinatown that would help in creating the new master plan for that area. Another important output includes education of participants that in fact everyone is responsible for creating and maintaining a healthy environment and high quality of public space. Finally, it is important to remember that changing the neighbourhood requires cooperation and modern level of management. The main disadvantage of this social participation method is the price and the fact that it was narrowed down to one group of recipients. However, Participatory Chinatown should be remembered as a good and innovatory method worth further research and attention.
Zeszyty Naukowe KUL
|
2022
|
vol. 65
|
issue 2
3-28
EN
The aim of this article is firstly to analyse the levels of young people’s social participation, along with its selected determinants. Secondly, the aim is to answer the question: how do the research participants value voluntary initiatives and actions proposed at school? Research findings by representatives of social sciences concerning the situation of modern-day young people, their social participation, passive attitudes and on the issue of civic education constitute a reference point for the discussion. Subject to analysis are outcomes of representative sociological research conducted among adult young people attending secondary schools in the Archdiocese of Lublin in 2020 and 2021. The paper discusses the declared statements of the respondents on their participation in non-compulsory groups and initiatives organized at school, as well as in extra-curricular, pro-social organizations and actions. The statistical analyses included the following independent variables: sex, place of residence and religiosity measured by attitude towards faith, chi-square and Cramer’s V tests. The conclusions show among others that the respondents exhibit a low level of social participation. They highlight the potential to be found in their positive valuation of various forms of engagement as well as their willingness to take part in actions that aim at helping others in the future.
PL
Celem artykułu jest analiza poziomu i wybranych uwarunkowań partycypacji społecznej młodzieży oraz odpowiedź na pytanie, jak badani wartościują dobrowolne inicjatywy i działania proponowane na terenie szkoły. Teoretycznym punktem odniesienia są ustalenia przedstawicieli nauk społecznych na temat współczesnej sytuacji ludzi młodych, ich społecznej partycypacji i bierności, a także zagadnienie edukacji obywatelskiej. Przedmiot refleksji stanowią wyniki reprezentatywnych badań socjologicznych zrealizowanych w latach 2020 i 2021 wśród pełnoletnich uczniów szkół ponadpodstawowych na terenie archidiecezji lubelskiej. Tekst zawiera omówienie ich deklaracji dotyczących udziału w fakultatywnych grupach i inicjatywach organizowanych w szkole oraz w organizacjach i działaniach prospołecznych poza nią. Przeprowadzane analizy statystyczne uwzględniają zmienne niezależne: płeć, miejsce zamieszkani i religijność, mierzoną stosunkiem do wiary. Zastosowano również testy chi-kwadrat i V Cramera. Konkluzje wskazują na znacząco niski poziom partycypacji społecznej badanej młodzieży, ale też na potencjał tkwiący w jej pozytywnym wartościowaniu rożnych form zaangażowania oraz w gotowości do działań ukierunkowanych na pomoc innym w przyszłości.
PL
Artykuł opisuje nowoczesną formę uczestnictwa mieszkańców w tworzeniu prawa i dokumentów strategicznych na przykładzie Estonii. Estonia to państwo, które jako jedno z pierwszych w Europie wprowadziło głosowanie internetowe, podpis internetowy czy mobile-ID, czyli cyfrowy dowód osobisty zamieszczony na karcie SIM. To właśnie dzięki innowacjom Estonia w ciągu ostatnich 25 lat stała się „bałtyckim tygrysem”. Warto wyciągać wnioski z sukcesów państwa, które dokonania zarówno w zakresie gospodarki, jak i rozwiązań ICT budzą podziw na całym świecie.
EN
During the last fourteen years amount of the Internet users increased more than 7 times – to 3035,7 million people in 2014. In North America around 87,7% of the population have access to the Internet, whereas in Europe it reaches nearly 70,5%. The Estonian government decided that being connected is one of the most important human rights nowadays. In consequence Estonia spent 2-7% of their budget developing broadband Internet connections and e-administration tools, as well as for effective social dialogue improvement. During the last fourteen years the Estonian government completed three e-participation projects, developed useful electronic tools for improving citizens’ access to public life and invited self-government to adapt e-participation systems in local environment. Example: Today I Shall Decide (2000-2006) – first pioneer electronic participation project in Europe. Government agencies have run a website, where citizens could propose, discuss and vote for their propositions of new legislation. In seven years time, people submitted 1187 new proposals, 1% of which was entered into force. Though TID was innovative it had some issues like declining interests and disappointing involvement of the officials. Estonia has also run Osale.ee (from 2007) – heir of the TID project. A perfect website with 3 key features: deliberation, participation and information. With this project they increased the engagement of the officials and users are taken more serious – and Volis – project where government assists local governments in improvement of e-participation systems. In March 2000 Estonian parliament gave e-signature the same legal weight as traditional one. Since 2005 every Estonian citizen has the possibility to vote via Internet from every place in the world. Estonia is an example of modern governing in post- -socialist world. Polish public agencies should learn from them and create effective e-governance to become a friendly and modern state.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.