Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  pedagogical discourse
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

ЦІННІСНІСТРАТЕГІЇПЕДАГОГІЧНОГОДИСКУРСУ ЯКОСНОВИПРОФЕСІЙНОЇОСВІТИМАЙБУТНІХФАХІВЦІВ

100%
Леся К.
Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології
|
2017
|
issue 1(65)
88-99
EN
Theoretical generalization and modern decision of scientific problem of theory and methodology of professional education – the students’ education of pedagogical discourse as a means of intensification of educational process in the modern higher educational establishment that lie in determination of theoretical elements and practical base of providing of professional and pedagogical direction, working out and introducing of system of forming of students’ preparedness to future professional activity in the educational practice is made. Discourse in modern science is interpreted in different ways, but most of the researches admit that it does not exist without the text. The pedagogic discourse as a stable type of situation of verbal behavior that involves the use of the set of texts of certain genres. On the basis of the theoretical analysis of philosophic, philological and pedagogical literature the necessity of the students of humanities learning of pedagogical discourse is revealed and proved. The main factors of educational intensification are determined: increasing of purposefulness of professional pedagogical education; intensification of motivation; increasing of informational capacity of the content of education, application of active methods and forms of education with the speeding up of the time of educational actions; the development of skills of educational work; using of new informational technologies. A deep scientific analysis of the problem of intensification of professional teaching discourse as the determinants of higher education development gives reason to believe that this problem is not enough developed in the theory and methodology of professional education. The problem is associated with the preparation of students for professional activities, especially at the stage of modernization of the whole system of education of Ukraine. Further directions of research are seen in the justification of continuity in the organization culture of discourse in the general training of the future teachers, the use of a pedagogical discourse for students in the educational system ofsecondary schools
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Проблемы лингвоэкологии русской речи

67%
Иванян Е.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica Rossica
|
2016
|
issue 12
63-68
EN
The characteristic of linguoecological problems in the Russian speech is given in the article The short review of the reasons which have caused violations of a linguoecology in the Russian speech in the 20th century – the beginning of the 21st century is carried out. It is shown that violations in linguoecology of the Russian speech in the 20th century have been caused by refusal of traditions of the Russian culture and moral values that has led to numerous phraseological oblivion. Destructions of the Russian discourse in the 21st century are caused first of all by globalization, an assumption of such type of tolerance which borders on permissiveness that leads to the facts of a dehumanization and as a result to violations in a speech of linguoecology. The results of a two years’ research of a genre of the pedagogical remark (method of the included supervision, and also questioning of 1700 informants) are presented in the article; both positive examples of estimation at a lesson, and distructures of a pedagogical discourse are revealed. Dependence between bad tradition of pedagogical censure and rate of application of destructive phraseological units, zoomorphisme is shown. Охарактеризованы риторические вопросы как приём речевого манипулирования в педагогическом дискурсе; выявлены неочевидные деструктемы (деструктемы-метафоры, паразитирующие на идее инвалидности; деструктемы-гиперболы, базирующиеся на угрозе смерти). Rhetorical questions as reception of a speech manipulation in a pedagogical discourse are characterized; unevident distructures are revealed (the distructures-metaphors parasitizing on the idea of disability; the distructures-hyperboles which are based on threat of death).
RU
В статье даётся характеристика проблемы лингвоэкологии русской речи. Осуществляется краткий обзор причин, вызвавших нарушения лингвоэкологии русской речи в ХХ в. – начале ХХI в. Показано, что нарушения в лингвоэкологии русской речи в ХХ в. были обусловлены отказом от традиций русской культуры и моральных ценностей, что привело, в частности, к многочисленным фразеологическим забвениям. Деструкции русского дискурса в ХХI в. вызваны в первую очередь глобализацией, превратным пониманием толерантности, граничащим с вседозволенностью, что приводит к фактам дегуманизации и как следствие к нарушениям в лингвоэкологии речи. В статье представлены результаты двухлетнего исследования жанра педагогического замечания (методом включенного наблюдения, а также анкетированием 1700 информаторов); выявлены как позитивные примеры оценивания на уроке, так и деструктемы педагогического дискурса. Показана зависимость между недоброй традицией педагогического порицания и частотностью применения деструктивных фразеологизмов, зооморфизмов. Охарактеризованы риторические вопросы как приём речевого манипулирования в педагогическом дискурсе; выявлены неочевидные деструктемы (деструктемы-метафоры, паразитирующие на идее инвалидности; деструктемы-гиперболы, базирующиеся на угрозе смерти).
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Symboliczne praktyki edukacji. Doświadczenie A.S. Makarenki w postsocjalistycznym dyskursie pedagogicznym

67%
Połonnikow A.
Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji
|
2017
|
vol. 13
|
issue 4(39)
9-21
EN
The problem discussed in the article is related to the attitude to the pedagogical tradition born in conditions of the formation and development of the totalitarian society. Its reconstruction and analysis is organized by denoting this experience in the form of text. In this context the relation to tradition gains an intertextual character, constructed by it being referred to the context of modernity. The key function of such contextualisaion is the so-called re-symbolization. Three strategies of resymbolization are described, namely “iconoclastic”, “iconomanic”, and “social-constructionistic”. They all, to some extent, are present in the pedagogical discourse of the post-socialist communities. The former two strategies are oriented at the “truth” of the tradition, whereas the third strategy considers is as an interpretive and practical category. Analyzed is the structural-functional organization of the three strategies of resymbolization.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.