Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  penal order
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Official datasets are the most frequently used by sentencing scholars and the court system. Nevertheless, when investigating certain topics, researchers often have to merge these datasets with their own. We illustrate this approach by collecting and presenting a dataset containing detailed descriptions of court proceedings for all cases from 2006 onward (InfoSoud), which we then merge with the official criminal court dataset. This allows us to analyze which sentences are imposed after a protest has been filed against a penal order, i.e., a court order by which the accused is found guilty but is only subject to lenient penalties. Our findings reveal that although jurisprudence has long criticized the imposition of harsher sanctions following a contested penal order, it is still a rather common phenomenon. Many offenders who file a protest are either not found guilty or are given harsher sentences than those executable via penal order.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2018
|
vol. 28
|
issue 3
83-99
PL
Postępowanie nakazowe stanowi jeden z rodzajów postępowania szczególnego. Cechuje to postępowanie daleko posunięta redukcja formalizmu. W artykule omówiono instytucje charakterystyczne dla tego rodzaju procedowania, zauważając dopuszczalność takich rozwiązań, ale i niebezpieczeństwa kryjące się w orzekaniu wyłącznie na podstawie materiału dowodowego zebranego przez oskarżyciela publicznego. Ponadto, przedstawiono szczegółową analizę przesłanek pozytywnych i negatywnych postępowania nakazowego.
EN
Order/writ procedure is a type of special procedure. It is characterized by a deep reduction of formalism. The article discusses the institutions characteristic of this type of procedure, pointing to the admissibility of this type of solutions and the risks related to examination of cases based solely on the evidence collected by the public prosecutor. A detailed analysis of positive and negative grounds for the order/writ procedure was provided.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.