Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  personal inviolability
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the commented judgment, the Constitutional Tribunal stated that the provisions of laws and regulations providing for the right of officers of many services to search a person or carry out a personal inspection are inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The inappropriate division of regulations between laws and sub-statutory acts, violating the constitutional requirement of specifying the principles and procedure of limiting the rights and freedoms of the individual at the level of a law, was rightly ques-tioned. The Tribunal also referred to the obligation to ensure effective mechanisms of protection of individuals against unjustified interference with their rights through the introduction of effective measures of appeal against undertaken actions. Due to the narrow scope of the Ombudsman’s request initiating proceedings before the Tribunal, the consideration was limited only to certain aspects of searches and personal inspection. However, valuable, albeit fragmentary, references to the essence of these activities and their nor-mative shape, desirable from the constitutional perspective, can be found in the judgement.
EN
The purpose of the article is to conduct a comprehensive legal analysis of the patient’s consent to carry out a medical procedure in the light of national case-law and doctrinal views, including the issue of the act of will of minors. The concept of informed consent of the beneficiary has become a determinant of the scope of medical or nursing intervention, constituting both its legality and the overall relationship of the patient with the medical staff. The synthetic interpretation of the issue also draws attention to the dilemma of the collision of values between the doctor’s action in the defense of the patient’s life and health without obtaining consent to the confluence, and the issue of violation of the test’s right to preservation of inviolability. In light of this, the authors clarify the premises of legal liability of medical staff under Article 192 of the Criminal Code.
PL
Artykuł ma na celu przeprowadzenie kompleksowej analizy prawnej pojęcia zgody badanego na przeprowadzenie zabiegu medycznego w świetle orzecznictwa krajowego i poglądów doktryny, włączając w to problematykę wyrażenia aktu woli osób małoletnich. Koncepcja świadomej zgody świadczeniobiorcy funkcjonuje obecnie jako wyznacznik zakresu lekarskiej bądź pielęgniarskiej ingerencji, decydującej tak o jej legalności, jak i całokształcie relacji pacjenta z personelem medycznym. Syntetyczna wykładnia zagadnienia zwraca uwagę także na dylemat kolizji wartości pomiędzy działaniem lekarza w obronie życia i zdrowia pacjenta bez uzyskania przezeń zgody na zabieg a kwestią pogwałcenia prawa badanego do zachowania nietykalności. W świetle tego autorzy klarują przesłanki odpowiedzialności prawnej personelu medycznego na mocy art. 192 k.k.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.