Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  philosophy of act
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Czyn czy słowo - co leży u podstaw filozofii pierwszej?

100%
Pokorski B., Łódzki U.
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
|
2018
|
vol. 42 (3)
EN
In this paper I compare the philosophy of being, which has its model example in the philosophy of Aristotle, with the philosophy of action proposed by Stanisław Brzozowski. These two constructions differ in their consideration starting point. The first one chooses the word as a start, while the second chooses an act. I tried to show contrast between these two positions and the consequences in the philosophical practice that depend on their primary assumptions. I discuss the differences between the philosophy that deals with things of the objective realm, that now becomes metascience and the philosophy of culture, which deals with the subject and the historically made world of human experience that was created by the working generations of men. The importance of this difference is essential if we want to ask a philosophical question about the crisis of culture.
PL
W niniejszym tekście porównuję filozofię bytową, której modelowym przykładem jest filozofia Arystotelesa, z filozofią czynu zaproponowaną przez Stanisława Brzozowskiego. Te dwie konstrukcje różnią się co do punktu wyjścia rozważań. Pierwsza z nich obiera słowo jako początek, druga zaś czyn. W tekście starałem się pokazać kontrast między tymi stanowiskami i konsekwencje w uprawianiu filozofii wypływające z przyjętych założeń. Omawiam różnice pomiędzy filozofią zajmującą się przedmiotami świata rzeczy, obecnie stającą się metanauką, a filozofią kultury, która zajmuje się podmiotem i historycznie stworzonym przez pracujące pokolenia światem ludzkiego doświadczenia. Zaznaczenie tej różnicy jest niezbędne jeśli chcemy postawić filozoficzne pytanie o kryzys kultury.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Refleksje wokół teorii zaangażowania i czynu w ujęciu E. Mouniera

80%
Witko K.
Roczniki Teologii Dogmatycznej
|
2010
|
vol. 2
131-142
EN
Politicians, philosophers, sociologists, educators, and priests often declare their belief that there is a universal crisis of political, civil, and existential commitment among the youth and adults. E. Mounier’s philosophical and existential output is undoubtedly one of the more interesting reflections on authentic commitment in twentieth-century thinkers. It seems, however, that the thought of the French personalist has not been sufficiently accepted, nor appropriately appreciated. It is not just a matter of the moment. His theory of act and commitment is firmly based on the ethics of responsibility for one another and the indispensable dignity of the human person. This paper is an attempt to bring closer some aspects of Mounier’s theory of act. His work may open a horizon for further reflections. After all this sketch should allow the reader to better grasp the concept of commitment from the angle of Christian personalism that is fundamental for the understanding of the mystery of the person.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.