Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  polilekt
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Główne tezy antropocentrycznej teorii języków

100%
Grucza S.
Lingwistyka Stosowana / Applied Linguistics / Angewandte Linguistik
|
2010
|
issue 2
41-68
EN
The anthropocentric theory of human languages was created as a consequence of a question posed by F. Grucza concerning, firstly, the ontological status of what expressions such as „human language(s)" apply to, i.e. a question how exists this what we call in such a way, and secondly, a question, how the so-called „acquisition of language" takes place. From the ontological point of view these things need to be divided into two categories: (a) actual human languages (idiolects), i.e. languages of concrete people, (b) intellectual constructs (ideal models). Also the things that we refer to as „languages for special purposes" should in the first line be divided into two categories: (a) actual languages for special purposes, i.e. languages of concrete specialists, and (b) the mentioned general languages for special purposes (intellectual constructs, ideal models), also called „trade" languages for special purposes or „field" languages for special purposes.
2

O nieporozumieniach w sprawie siły lingwistyki.

100%
Grucza S.
Lingwistyka Stosowana / Applied Linguistics / Angewandte Linguistik
|
2009
|
issue 1
99-113
EN
Recent readings concerning discourse analysis, its aims, tasks and explicative potential support the thesis that there has been a lot of confusion around discourse analysis, especially around its subject scope. It seems that the confusion is mainly caused by lack of understanding of what it is that we refer to as "language" and how it exists. By ignoring the ontological answers concerning language, the linguistic discussion on discourse is distorted, and often this ignorance also leads to taking refuge in psychological and/or sociological discussion. As a consequence, due to lack of understanding of what language is and how it exists, language (linguistic) issues are sometimes explained with help of psychological and/or sociological theories and approaches. If the formal definition of the subject of science has the form of the following set [O1 ... Ox; W1 ... Wy; R1 ... Rz], then the primary tasks of the critical discourse analysis should consist in answering the question which objects and which characteristics of these objects are in the center of its cognitive interest. Moreover, the critical discourse analysis should also give answer to the question how and on what grounds it tries to reconstruct (describe) the characteristics taken into consideration. On the grounds of texts understood as linguistic expressions, on the basis of discourses understood as sequences of texts produced materially by various participants of the given interaction, or on the grounds of other objects under observation?
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.