Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  politologia,
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Politics happen in the world of organizations. It has an organizational dimension. Organizations on the other hand undergo political phenomena and processes, they have a political dimension. Political science does not investigate these issues sufficiently. Quoting LaPalombara one could say that in political science there is a serious gap in this respect. Meanwhile it is exactly in these areas that should be found answers to the crucial questions about the nature of contemporary politics, which happens more and more in the sphere which is but seemingly apolitical or outside politics. Politics does not disappear, but it becomes post-politics which “hides from” or “escapes” political scientists. In the studies of organization or management there is a current focused on the phenomena of power and politics in organizations, however, even these, normatively oriented disciplines, do not explore the problematic enough. It is possible to reconstruct a few major models of treating politics in organizations: considering politics as a pathology in organizations, the theory of organizational games, the political interpretation of the strategic process, and understanding organizations as political systems. There are also some more fundamental links to be found between politics and organizations – as well as between the paradigms of interpretation employed by political sciences and organizational studies – politics can be understood as a process of organizing the social life, while organization and organizing as essentially political phenomena. Thus, it seems justified not only to employ the tools of political science in the study of organizations or the tools of organizational studies in the interpretation of politics, but also to postulate further integration of political and organizational studies, to remove artificial boundaries and seek a synergic synthesis of the achievements of the two disciplines. Such attitude should be embraced in academic education too.
PL
Na przykładzie prac badawczych z pogranicza nauki o polityce i prawa międzynarodowego publicznego, autorzy rozpatrują problemy, wyzwania i szanse, jakie stoją przed wspólną politologiczno-prawniczą narracją naukową. Celem artykułu jest pobudzenie dyskusji nad możliwościami politologiczno-prawniczych badań w Polsce oraz nad możliwościami sformułowania spójnej wspólnej narracji. Wywód opiera się na założeniu, zgodnie z którym integracja metod i technik badawczych, perspektyw i teorii, wiedzy politologicznej i prawniczej oraz synergia narracji, obecnych na gruncie wskazanych dyscyplin, zwiększą ich potencjał naukowy, potencjał eksplanacyjny. Wśród pięciu głównych wniosków ze swoich doświadczeń i rozważań autorzy wskazują m.in., że: politologiczno-prawnicza narracja ma szansę w pełni rozwinąć się jedynie w warunkach konsekwentnej, zinstytucjonalizowanej współpracy między przedstawicielami obu dyscyplin; politolodzy i prawnicy muszą być świadomi transgeniczności ich dyscyplin; wspólna politologiczno-prawnicza narracja musi być ugruntowana w uzasadnionym merytorycznie i metodologicznie planie badawczym, musi dotyczyć ustaleń empirycznych i/lub teoretycznych będących rezultatem wspólnych badań oraz musi być uznana za logiczną konsekwencję akceptacji komplementarności dyscyplin nauk społecznych.
EN
By the example of research from the borderline of political science and public international law, the authors examine problems, challenges and opportunities facing common political science-legal scientific narrative. The aim of this article is to stimulate discussion on opportunities for political science-legal research in Poland, as well as on opportunities for formulating coherent common narrative. The argumentation is based on the assumption, according to which integration of research methods and techniques, perspectives and theories, political science and legal knowledge, and synergy of narratives, present in indicated disciplines, could increase their scientific potential, explanatory potential. Among five main conclusions from their research experiences and considerations, the authors claim i.a. that: political science-legal narrative has a chance to fully develop only in the conditions of consequent, institutionalized cooperation between representatives of both disciplines; political scientists and legal scholars must be aware of transgenicity of their disciplines; common political science-legal narrative must be grounded in substantively and methodologically justified research plan, it must relate to empirical and/or theoretical findings being the result of common research, and it must be recognized as logical consequence of acceptance of complementarity of social sciences’ disciplines.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.