Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  posiedzenie Sejmu
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Artykuł traktuje o prawnej ocenie blokowania mównicy sejmowej, fotela Marszałka Sejmu oraz plenarnej sali posiedzeń Sejmu, a także o możliwościach postępowania Marszałka Sejmu w celu przywrócenia na niej porządku. Kwestie te omówiono w nim na przykładzie sytuacji powstałej na 33. posiedzeniu Sejmu RP.
EN
The article contains legal analysis of acts committed by Members of Parliament during the thirty-third session of Sejm of the Republic of Poland in 2016. During that session Members blocked: a podium of Sejm, the Speaker of the Sejm’s armchair and the plenary hall of Sejm.
EN
The discussed Article specifies the acceptable subject matter of points of order. The assumption that they may concern matters being the subject of orders of the day and the course of sittings means that the subject matter of the point of order cannot become a matter to be considered in the future, i.e. during any of subsequent sittings. In the author’s opinion, it is in principle unacceptable to submit pro futuro points of order. Article 184 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm refers only to the subject of the point of order and not to the motives of the motion submitted by the applicant. This means that, on justifying the point of order, a Deputy may rely on external circumstances, i.e. not related to a group of matters considered by the Sejm during a given sitting.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.