Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: power division

Sort By:

Limit search:

Nové možnosti prístupu k výskumu dejín vojvodstva v 11. storočí

100%

Bagi D.

Acta historica Neosoliensia Vedecký časopis pre historické vedy

2021

vol. 24

issue 2

5-60

The study presents previous research on the history of the duchy in Hungarian, Czechoslovak (Czech) and Polish historiography as well. It also represents a new research concept. The Arpads‘ system of power division in the 11th century cannot be considered either as a model of state development or as a mere exercise of dynastic inheritance or family law. Instead of research on the statedevelopment, it is more appropriate to proceed from the then understanding of law and the organization of society, contained primarily in narrative sources and then situate the history of the duchy into it. The basis of this order had been represented by the system of relations between free people, based on a friendship confirmed by an oath. We can assume that these interpersonal relations had also determined the competence of the duchy and dukes. When comparing the Arpad dynastyduchy with similar constitutions of the Piast and Přemyslid dynasties, we can state that the territorial power division does not necessarily correspond to the authority/competent one. We still do not know the exact territorial extent of the duchy in the Kingdom of Hungary. However, we can say with certainty that its centers, unlike the Piast ones, had only slightly affected the main royal residences. While good relations had been lasting in the ruling dynasty, the dukes had important competencies. These competencies meant a share in the royal power, so the agreement had primarily represented the division of competencies. This might explain why kings and dukes regularly appear together in the main positions of the country, together representing the ruling power. The model of the power division between the Arpads in the 11th century was thus primarily family-based. It was based on consensus among family members.According to this consensus, the power division affecting the whole country had been in the ratio 2 : 1. The sources do not mention exactly what the members of the ruling family had divided among themselves. We can suppose that the reason was because it was not necessary, since the Hungarian chronicler understood the term divisio regni in the meaning of the disputes over the throne, as well as the power division.

Everyone has Their own Socrates

51%

Kseňák Š.

Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego

2021

issue 6 (64)

555-565

Prawo to konstrukcja społeczna. Koncentruje się na regulacji stosunków społecznych. Interpretację przepisów prawnych stale dostosowuje się do kontekstu społecznego. Z drugiej strony prawo silnie wpływa na rozwój społeczeństwa, wyznaczając przyszły kontekst społeczny. Konstytucja, w rozumieniu prawa podstawowego państwa, jest jednym z podstawowych prawnych wyznaczników przyszłego kontekstu społecznego każdego państwa. Konstytucja wpływa na kształt i treść przyjętych w przyszłości uwarunkowań prawnych oraz ich wykładnię. Regulacja stosunków społecznych wedle wytycznych określonych prawem stanowi efekt ludziego działania w celu uzyskania zabezpieczenia. Ten wysiłek może przynieść rezultat poprzez poszanowanie tego co już zostało osiągnięte, ponieważ ludzkość dotychczas nie stworzyła jeszcze niczego bardziej efektywnego. Każde państwo i wspólnota ponadnarodowa tworzą własny superparadygmat - identyczny światopogląd społeczeństwa. Jeśli chodzi o zmiany kontekstu społecznego, bez względu na jego przyczynę, logicznie rzecz biorąc, następuje zmiana superparadygmatu społecznego. Odpowiedzią na to jest Konstytucja i działalność sądów, mających uprawnienia obrońców konstytucyjności.

Law is a social construction. It focuses on the regulation of social relations. The interpretation of legal rules is constantly adapting to the social context. On the other side, the law code strongly influences society’s development, determining the future social context. The Constitution, within the understanding of basic law in any country, is one of the basic legal determinants of the future social context of any country. The Constitution affects the form and the content of the future accepted legal determiners and their interpretation. The regulation of social relations by the legal code is about the human effort to achieve insurance in this uncertain world. This effort might bring the result respecting that humanity has not invented anything more effective yet. Any state and transnational community create own superparadigm - the identical worldview of the society. Regarding the changes of the social context, with no respect to its reason, there comes logically a change of social superparadigm. The Constitution responds to it as well as there are the activities of the courts, having the rights of constitutionality defenders.

Refine search results

1 Acta historica Neosoliensia Vedecký časopis pre historické vedy

1 Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego

1 Bagi D.

1 Kseňák Š.

2 2021

Search results

Nové možnosti prístupu k výskumu dejín vojvodstva v 11. storočí

Everyone has Their own Socrates