Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  pravidla
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This work is based on language material comprising 1,508 pages. The analyzed texts are taken from the websites novinky.cz, lidovky.cz and idnes.cz, as these are records of discussion forums representingreactions to published news and comments. Overall, over 10,000 discussion messages were collected. The aim of this work is to analyze the tendency to vulgar expression in the observed discussion forums. I will try to find out how much the users keep or break the rules. Last but not least I will detect which means of vulgar and polite expressions prevail in this environment and to what extent the situation varies between the respective discussion forums.
2
Content available remote

A Weberian Approach to the Ethos of Science

80%
EN
Robert Merton judged his ethos of science as "a limited introduction to a larger problem" in his seminal article. Despite this caution, the ethos has been interpreted, used and criticized as a self-consistent normative structure. As such, critics consider the ethos of science too rudimentary, obsolete or ideological. To overcome these critics, some supporters of the concept propose to revisit or to reconstruct it. This essay is an attempt to satisfy critics and supporters while respecting Merton's legacy. For that purpose, we consider a Weberian paradigm to expand this "limited introduction".
CS
Robert Merton ve svém zásadním článku považoval svoje pojetí étosu vědy za "omezený úvod většího problému". I přes toto varování byl étos interpretován, používán a kritizován jako sama o sobě konzistentní normativní struktur. Jako takový jej kritici považují za příliš rudimentární, zastaralý či ideologický. Aby tyto kritiky překonali, zastánci tohoto konceptu prosazují návrat k němu, nebo jeho rekonstrukci. Tato esej představuje snahu uspokojit kritiky i zastánce, zatímco respektuje Mertonův odkaz. Za tímto účelem promýšlíme weberovské paradigma, aby byl tento "omezený úvod" rozšířen.
EN
The paper presents a detailed description of the linguistic software system Kontrola české gramatiky (Grammar Checker for Czech) that checks grammatical, orthographic and stylistic correctness of a text written in Czech, highlights the errors encountered and offers a user corrections of the errors committed. The Grammar checker for Czech has been integrated in the Microsoft Word software product within the system Microsoft Office™ version 2003 (since 2005) and subsequently 2007, 2010 and 2013. The paper focuses on the history of the project, presents ideas on which the Checker is based, describes how the Checker can be utilized including interactive error corrections, presents a detailed description of the errors detected and an algorithm of the Checker’s processing an input text. It is not only external aspects of the grammar checking system that are depicted, i.e. how the Checker presents itself to the user and how the user should use it, but also the whole conceptual basis of the system: what components it consists of and how they cooperate. The core of the Checker is constituted by formalized grammatical (especially syntactic), orthographic and stylistic rules detecting mainly grammatical and also some orthographic a stylistic errors in Czech texts. The rules use primarily the results of automatic part-of-speech and morphological analysis and morphological disambiguation of Czech texts and also morphological synthesis. An error is conceived of as a violation of the grammar and orthography of contemporary standard written Czech, the grammar being expressed by the rule-based system. The Checker deals with errors of spelling only in special grammatically motivated cases and in those cases where the people usually make mistakes; a full-fledged spell checker had already been integrated in the Microsoft Office package before the emergence of the Checker and a new one was not needed. In the conclusion, the success rate of the Checker is briefly compared to the Grammaticon system, a survey of positive and negative aspects of the Checker is presented and future directions of its potential further development are shown.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.