Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help
Authors help
Years help

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  prawo międzyczasowe
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Restrictions on agricultural real estate are the subject of many statements as they affect the ownership triad. This time the subject of consideration is the intertemporal issue in the context of understanding the rule of intermittent law tempus regit actum. The commented resolution of the Supreme Court of September 7, 2018, III CZP 32/18 shows the enforcement aspect of agricultural legal issues. The author seeks to answer the question about the correct interpretation of the legislator’s silence. He asks basic questions about who the “buyer” is and what is “proceeding to acquire property”. The interpretation of these statutory phrases plays an important role in this study. Since the result of the linguistic interpretation is unsatisfactory, and yet the loopholes in the law are only apparent, a purposeful, systemic and authentic interpretation is used. The author conducts an in-depth analysis of the issue against the background of the real estate execution model. The conclusions derived from the analysis allow for the approval of commented resolution and recognition that the silence of the legislator is quite apparent. In addition to the evaluation, the impact of this decision on practice is shown.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.