Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Forum Prawnicze

Authors help

  1. 1 Zelek M.

Years help

  1. 1 2018

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  press correction
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Glosa krytyczna do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 16 lutego 2017 r., sygn. I CSK 106/16

100%
Zelek M.
Forum Prawnicze
|
2018
|
issue 2 (46)
96–106
EN
The commentary contains a presentation and evaluation of the arguments that were given by the Supreme Court to justify the thesis, according to which the press correction cannot be signed by the plenipotentiary of the interested person, but the person concerned must do so by delineating his or her own signature. In the article, attention was also paid to the motives that led the legislator to shape the formal requirements for press correction in such a way that one of its ele- ments must be the signature, as well as other arguments allowing, in the author’s opinion, to consider the Supreme Court’s position as incorrect.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.