Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 27

first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  principle of subsidiarity
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
Studia Ełckie
|
2020
|
vol. 22
|
issue 4
469-479
EN
In our times by design a subsidiarity to which many fields of study are appealing, is fundamentals of the social order especially from the field of the social science and legal. On land of pedagogy categories of the subsidiarity and the help were also developed, their theoretical assumptions along with the practical implications. This notion was settled not only in the context of pedagogy, but also the social policy adjusting tasks and functioning of the system of the welfare. Exactly a subsidiarity understood as the prevention is nature of the contemporary welfare, and in the time withdrawal of situations justifying using from the welfare, supporting persons and families in efforts aiming at satisfying the essential needs and enables them to live in conditions suiting the human dignity. Therefore the kind, the form and the size of benefits should be suitable for the difficult situation of the practical person or the family which is justify-ing providing assistance.
EN
In the authors’ view, the proposed directive infringes the principle of subsidiarity and does not deserve support at the Council of European Union. The proposal applies to organizations and relationships of both trans-border and strictly national nature, irrespective of the sector in which the collective societies operate, or whether they are engaged in multi-territorial licensing. According to the authors’ conclusions, the European Commission did not prove that EU Member States, acting independently or cooperating among themselves, cannot achieve the objectives specified in the proposal. An analysis of current Polish legal provisions and their evolution shows that achievement of those objectives is not only possible as a result of measures taken at the national level, but in fact those objectives have been to a considerable degree achieved.
EN
The article deals with the issue of developing the entrepreneurial attitude among children placed in foster care. The subject is discussed in the context of the principle of subsidiarity, especially in the social aspect. Initially, the author presents the characteristics of family and institutionalfoster care. Then, she describes the essence of the subsidiarity principle in social terms. What follows is an outline of the problem of entrepreneurial attitudes among young people. Next, the author proceeds to her own research within the discussed scope. The process of a foster child’s entry into an adult life is an extremely difficult stage in his or her life, and it is also a challenge for the custodians/foster parents. Therefore, preparing for independence by developing the entrepreneurial attitude among young people is necessarily a longitudinal process.
EN
In the modern world there is a growing reflection on the essence of the relationship between the state and society, which is regulated in according to the principle of subsidiarity. This principle is based on the positive assumption that society – its citizens and social communities – should develop their activities and that the state should help them and intervene when necessary. In this way, the principle of subsidiarity is formulated both in secular law and in the social doctrine of the Catholic Church. In the latter case, this is one of the key issues presented in the papal encyclicals.
EN
The discussion in the article takes into account two aspects: the specific nature of contracts as legal forms of action of local government bodies, and the special rela- tionship of two branches of law, i.e. administrative law and public economic law. Both directions of this discussion entail a civil law aspect with a extended theory on contracts and the freedom of contract. The study assumes that the element linking the above threads is the principle of the social market economy as one of the foundations of the system of the Republic of Poland, which does not exclude state economic activity, subject to Article 1, Article 2 and Article 5 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This field includes the regulations of the Law on Municipal Management, whose addressees are local government bodies. For the implementation of the tasks assigned to local government in the field of economy, local government bodies enter into contracts; this is one of the legal forms that allows them to take into account the complexity of administration-economy relations (relationships), and therefore third parties: entrepreneurs, contractors, competitors and consumers. An area of study related to the issues stated in the title and which is significant for both theoretical and practical reasons is the regulation of Article 3 of the Law on Municipal Management. This provision provides a specific legal basis for concluding contracts “for the purpose of entrusting the performance of tasks” in the field of municipal management. The article points to the issue of the legal determination of contractual entrustment of such tasks, taking into account the constitutional principle of binding the administration to the law (Article 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland) and the civil law principle of freedom of contract (Article 353¹ of the Civil Code). The scope of freedom enjoyed by local government units in the use of the form of contract in the doctrine is also considered as an element  of “organizational independence” of these units, and whose theoretical expression is the constitutional principle of subsidiarity. The article emphasizes the lack of a general and common statutory basis in the Polish legal order that would regulate the transfer of public tasks, as well as the lack of a statutory regulation providing a template(s) for the contract, which is most often referred to in the doctrine as a public-legal contract.
EN
People leaving prisons face a number of barriers in the process of their social readaptation, making it difficult to exist in an open environment and fulfill specific social roles. A stay in a prison results in the prisonization of the prisoner and disturbs the sense of agency by limiting the possibility of making decisions and responsibility for them in various spheres of their life. Learned helplessness develops. Convicts are often stigmatized by society. This situation makes it difficult, sometimes impossible to return to functioning in an open environment, and to adapt again to independent living in society. Such persons require constructive and activating support in the process of their social reintegration, based on the use of their own potential, resources and possibilities. The applicable law (including the Act on Social Assistance) regulates the issue of providing support to people leaving prison in the form of cash benefits and non-material assistance, basing its operation on the principle of subsidiarity. However, a problem that is still relevant and discussed by academics and practitioners in the field of social work and social rehabilitation is the effectiveness of aid and activation measures and their impact on the course of the aid process and the related social reintegration of the former prisoner.
EN
The objective of this article is to present the intercountry adoption institutions in Polish family law. The objective is achieved by analysing the term ‘adoption’ by tracing it back to its origins in Imperium Romanum. Particular attention was paid to the recent amendment to the Penal Code, based on which the legal definition of the term ‘adoption’ was introduced (which is not the case of the Family and Guardianship Code) and to the differences between the terms ‘intercountry adoption’ and ‘foreign adoption’. The article includes the analysis of Article 1142 of the Family and Guardianship Code and the essence of the intercountry adop¬tion principle of subsidiarity. The purpose of the study was to show technical and organisa- tional issues related to the concept of intercountry adoption, such as pre-adoption period or ‘eligibility’ of potential adopters. One of the conclusions was that the citizenship of the adopter does not determine the international type of adoption, but his/her place of residence outside Poland. Certain international legal documents were reviewed to see how the adop- tee’s welfare is protected under international law and to outline the genesis of the regulations in Article 1142 of the Family and Guardianship Code. The author’s aim is to show the cir- cumstances favourable to the adoption of a child by a foreign couple. At this point, it should be stated that the child’s best interest should always remain the most important condition. Furthermore, when ruling in an adoption case, the court should protect the child’s interests, but also pay attention to the regulations concerning the continuity of the child’s upbringing as well as its ethnic, religious, cultural and linguistic identity. The above is related to the contemporary issue of adoption by homosexual couples. Countries, such as Poland, which do not allow adoption by homosexual couples may challenge the eligibility of candidates on the grounds of infringement of fundamental rules of the Polish legal order. Furthermore, the article includes statistical data concerning intercountry adoption. Currently, the number of intercountry adoptions decreases not only in Poland, but worldwide. In Poland, it may be caused by the tightening of the eligibility criteria for adopters and adoptees with respect to intercountry adoptions and reduction in the number of centres authorised to effect such adoptions. In the last part of the study, the author developed the argument that the issues of intercountry adoption are part of the global problems related to poverty and inequality.
EN
The article deals with the proposal for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Offi ce (COM(2013) 534 fi nal). The European Public Prosecutor’s Offi ce is to be set up as a new Union law enforcement authority responsible for prosecution of offences affecting the Union’s fi nancial interests. Particular attention was paid to the issue of the compatibility of the proposal with the principle of subsidiarity (Article 5 (3) TUE). The Treaty of Lisbon has made national parliaments of the Member State responsible for the observance of that principle. More than a dozen parliamentary chambers have submitted reasoned opinions through which they addressed their concerns about violation of that principle by the proposed regulation. Despite the strong reaction from the national parliaments the European Commission has decided to continue work on the proposal. From analysis of the arguments contained in the reasoned opinions submitted by the national parliaments on the proposed regulation about the European Public Prosecutor’s Offi ce it follows that the rules of the operation of the principle of subsidiarity, and the assessment criteria applied in this respect, are unclear. Most of the reasoned opinions from the national parliaments contains, apart from the allegations related strictly to the principle of subsidiarity, other objections of a legal or political nature, which do not concern that principle. The practice of national parliaments in this area is not uniform. Lack of uniformity may be one of the reasons why the Commission does not seem to hear the voice of the parliamentary chambers and is continuing the work on the proposal.
EN
The article is aimed at a preliminary assessment of the changes to be introduced to the European Convention on Human Rights by Protocol 15. This assessment is preceded by a brief characteristics of the margin of appreciation doctrine and of the principle of subsidiarity, as well as by areport on the preparation of this Protocol. The author refers the position of non-governmental organizations, quoting the arguments for and against the reform which are the most frequent in the discussion on the Protocol. Finally, the author attempts to assess whether or not the change will eliminate malfunctions within the European system of human rights protection resulting from the application of the margin of appreciation doctrine.
EN
The subject of the opinion is the proposal for a directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base examined altogether with the proposal for a directive on a Common Corporate Tax Base (COM(2016) 685 final), as the second part of the same legal initiative of the European Commission. According to the authors, their introduction shall limit fiscal sovereignty of Member States. It might result in a  necessity of amendments of fiscal substantive law, organization of the tax administration, as well as tax procedures. Effects of the discussed draft rules regarding budget of the European Union and particular budgets of Member States are difficult to predict. Current analyses indicate that Poland might lose a part of its tax incomes. Adoption of the discussed rules shall have an influence on taxation of companies which are outside the subject-related scope of the directives, what raises concerns of constitutional nature. According to the authors, the proposal for a directive is incompatible with the principle of subsidiarity.
EN
The purpose of the opinion is to examine thoroughly the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Presently, the issue of clinical trials is regulated differently in particular EU member states, due to their different legal traditions and constitutional standards. By allowing for experimentation on human beings without their knowledge or consent, the proposed regulation substantially infringes the principles of subsidiarity, proportionality and conferred competences, as well as human dignity and the right to integrity of the person guaranteed by Articles 1 and 3 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. These circumstances sufficiently justify initiation by the Polish Sejm of the procedure specified in Article 6 of Protocol 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality annexed to the Lisbon Treaty.
EN
In the contemporary literature on the subject, there is no doubt that local government performs tasks of a public nature. It is also acceptable for the local government to use legal instruments typical of the state authority. However, the issue of the principle of division of powers between the state and local government is disputed. If the existence of a local government equipped with its own, independently performed scope of tasks and responsibilities has been recognized as a legal principle of constitutional rank, then the division of tasks cannot be made in an optimal way only between separate state authorities (this is the so-called horizontal separation of powers). This division should be “vertical”, i.e. by allowing other non-state entities, mainly local governments, to perform state functions. Both the doctrine and the European community use the principle of subsidiarity when resolving the problem of separation of powers.
PL
We współczesnej literaturze przedmiotu nie budzi wątpliwości to, że samorząd terytorialny wykonuje zadania o charakterze publicznym. Akceptowane jest również posługiwanie się przez samorząd instrumentami prawnymi typowymi dla władzy państwowej. Sporna natomiast jest kwestia zasady podziału kompetencji między państwo a samorząd. Jeżeli za zasadę prawną o randze konstytucyjnej zostało uznane istnienie samorządu terytorialnego wyposażonego we własny, samodzielnie realizowany zakres zadań i obowiązków, to podział zadań nie może być dokonany w sposób optymalny wyłącznie między odrębne organy państwowe (jest to tzw. poziomy podział władzy). Podział ten powinien przebiegać „pionowo”, tj. przez dopuszczenie do sprawowania funkcji państwowych również innych podmiotów o niepaństwowym charakterze, w tym głównie samorządu terytorialnego. Zarówno doktryna, jak i wspólnota europejska przy rozstrzyganiu problemu podziału władz posługuje się zasadą subsydiarności.
EN
The article is an attempt to capture the principle of subsidiarity in the Italian public law. In contrast to polish solutions the principle of subsidiarity does not comprise general principle of law. In the article this principle is being reconstructed primarily by the principle of decentralization and also it is presented in limited range, in which it is convened by constitution and normal legislation. Nevertheless the author, regarding to the specifications of Italian institutional solutions, is arguing its existence and functioning in public low of Italian Republic. Owing to the fact the article include also comparative legal values.
EN
The subject of the opinion is a Proposal for a directive on a Common Corporate Tax Base examined altogether with the Proposal of a directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (COM(2016) 683 final) as the second part of the same initiative of the European Commission. Their introduction shall limit fiscal sovereignty of Member States. It might result in a necessity of amendments of fiscal substantive law, organization of the tax administration, as well as tax procedures. Effects of the discussed draft rules are regarding budget of the European Union and particular budgets of Member States difficult to predict. Current analyses indicate that Poland might lose a part of its tax incomes. Adoption of the discussed rules shall have an influence on taxation of companies which are outside the subject-related scope of the directives, what raises many concerns of constitutional nature. According to the authors, the proposal for a directive is incompatible with the principle of subsidiarity.
EN
The purpose of this article is to determine the relationship between the principles of subsidiarity and effectiveness and an effective remedy for the excessive length of proceedings within the legal order of the European Convention on Human Rights. The article assumes that these key principles of the ECHR’s legal order have an impact on such a remedy, both in the normative and practical dimensions. This assumption has helped explain many aspects of the Strasbourg case law regarding this remedy. Concerning the relationship of this remedy with the principle of subsidiarity, it raises issues such as: the “reinforcing” of Art. 6 § 1; the “close affinity” of Arts. 13 and 35 § 1; and the arguability test. In turn, through the prism of the principle of effectiveness, the reasonableness criterion and the requirement of diligence in the proceedings are presented, followed by the obligations of States to prevent lengthiness of proceedings and the obligations concerning adequate and sufficient redress for such an excessive length of proceedings. The analysis shows that an effective remedy with respect to the excessive length of proceedings is not a defnitive normative item, as the Court consistently adds new elements to its complex structure, taking into account complaints regarding the law and practice of States Parties in the prevention of and compensation for proceedings of an excessive length.
EN
The paper addresses the interpretation of the concept of local law issued by local gov- ernment, included in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997. Local law of territorial self-government, against authorizations of other law-making organs, features a broad spectrum of possibilities, from implementing acts to legislation differ- ent than statute, which depends on a specific statutory authorization that must carry out the constitutional principle of decentralization of public power under Article 15 and the principle of transferring to the local government of a substantial part of public du- ties under Article 16.
PL
Tekst dotyczy interpretacji pojęcia prawa lokalnego wydanego przez samorząd teryto- rialny, zawartej w Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 2 kwietnia 1997 r. Lokalne prawo samorządu terytorialnego, wbrew upoważnieniom innych organów ustawodaw- czych, zawiera szeroki spektrum możliwości, od aktów wykonawczych po ustawodaw- stwo inne niż ustawowe, które zależy od konkretnego ustawowego upoważnienia, które musi realizować konstytucyjną zasadę decentralizacji władzy publicznej zgodnie z art. 15 oraz zasadę przekazywania władzom lokalnym znacznej części społeczeństwa obowiąz- ki na podstawie art. 16.
EN
The present paper has four aims. First of all, to subject the legal powers of the European Union to enact private law rules in the fields of substantive private law, procedural private law and private international law to a doctrinal analysis. Secondly, to analyse the methodology of using those legal powers by the Union legislature and possible indications by the Court of Justice with that regard. Thirdly, to subject the individual rules granting powers to the EU to enact rules of substantive private law, procedural private law and private international law to a comparative analysis. Fourthly, on the basis of the analysis of the hitherto methods of using the aforementioned powers, provide for a critical appraisal and put forward suggestions as to the methods of using them.
EN
Upbringing is not merely a mix of activities on the part of the family and social institutions. Schools as well as different social organisations (especially youth ones) or church institutions responsible for upbringing activities are obliged to respect the Charter of the Rights of the Family. According to his document the family is the first and prior community of upbringing. Proper effects can be obtained only when certain conditions and rules of cooperation concerning all the entities engaged in the process of upbringing are implemented. It is worthwhile to discuss these rules and seek new ways of putting them into action
PL
Wychowanie nie jest prostą sumą działań rodziny i instytucji społecznych. Zarówno szkoła, jak i różne organizacje społeczne (w szczególności młodzieżowe) oraz instytucje kościelne podejmujące działania wychowawcze zobowiązane są do respektowania zapisów Karty Praw Rodziny uznającej rodzinę za pierwszą i w pewnym sensie nadrzędną wspólnotę wychowującą. Właściwe efekty wychowawcze można uzyskać tylko w sytuacji spełnienia określonych reguł współpracy wszystkich podmiotów wychowujących. Warto się pochylić nad tymi regułami i poszukiwać nowych sposobów realizacji ich treści.
EN
Proper waste management is one of the fundamental elements of the economy that has lead to ensure the economic security of the country. Without a ratinal and effective waste management there is a risk of many problems in such areas as energy, agriculture, food, health status of society. According to principle of subsidiarity, promoted by the European Union decision-making system in waste management and other segments of economy should be designed so that decisions are taken as close to citizens. The European Union should intervene only when action on local, regional or national level is not the optimal solution. The community is positioned closest to the people in Poland. It has been equipped with the number of operational tasks in the field of the municipal waste management. On the other hand, the European Union is to set strategic objectives and the creation of standards that must be observed in the management of municipal waste. This has lead to the creation of the effective waste management in Europe. The main target of the paper was to present the current system of decision-making in the waste management and judge its performance. It is based on the analysis of inner and international documents as well as secondary empirical data desribing the results achieved in the economy of waste in selected large cities operating on district rights.
PL
Właściwe gospodarowanie odpadami stanowi jeden z istotnych elementów gospodarki, który ma prowadzić do zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa ekonomicznego kraju. Bez racjonalnej i skutecznej gospodarki odpadowej istnieje ryzyko pojawienia się wielu problemów w takich obszarach, jak: energetyka, gospodarka żywnościowa, stan zdrowia społeczeństwa. W myśl zasady subsydiarności, propagowanej przez Unię Europejską, system decyzyjny w gospodarowaniu odpadami i innych segmentach gospodarki powinien być tak skonstruowany, aby decyzje były podejmowane jak najbliżej obywateli. Unia Europejska powinna ingerować jedynie wtedy, kiedy działanie na szczeblu lokalnym, regionalnym czy krajowym nie stanowi optymalnego rozwiązania. Jednostką terytorialną, usytuowaną najbliżej obywateli, w Polsce jest gmina, która zgodnie z zasadą subsydiarności została wyposażona w szereg zadań operacyjnych w zakresie gospodarowania odpadami komunalnymi. Natomiast zadaniem Unii Europejskiej jest wyznaczenie celów strategicznych i tworzenie wzorców, których trzeba przestrzegać w gospodarowaniu odpadami komunalnymi. Ma to prowadzić do powstania skutecznej gospodarki odpadami w skali Europy. Celem badawczym artykułu było przedstawienie istniejącego systemu decyzyjnego w gospodarce odpadami i ocena jego funkcjonowania. Prezentowane treści są oparte na analizie istniejących dokumentów krajowych i unijnych oraz danych empirycznych wtórnych, przedstawiających osiągnięte rezultaty w gospodarce odpadowej w wybranych dużych miastach funkcjonujących na prawach powiatu.
EN
The paper deals with the issue of legal conditions of expropriation and their changes in the background of the development of their legal regulation. It analyzes the conditions arising from both private and public law regulations and considers, in particular, some of the legal requirements not directly incorporated in constitutional regulations. Particular attention is paid to the requirement of the principle of subsidiarity of expropriation, which is emphasized both by theory and by partial legal regulations but is not explicitly included in the constitutional conditions of expropriation. The paper discusses some issues related to the principle of subsidiarity, especially concerning the institute of the necessary access to real estate.
CS
Příspěvek se věnuje problematice zákonných podmínek vyvlastnění a jejich proměn na pozadí vývoje právní úpravy. Analyzuje podmínky vyplývající jak ze soukromoprávních, tak veřejnoprávních předpisů a podrobněji se zamýšlí zejména nad některými zákonnými požadavky nemajícími přímou oporu v ústavních předpisech. Zvláštní pozornost je při tom věnována zejména požadavku subsidiarity vyvlastnění, který je sice zdůrazňován jak teorií, tak dílčími právními úpravami, mezi ústavněprávními podmínkami vyvlastnění však výslovně uveden není. V příspěvku jsou rozebrány některé otázky související se subsidiaritou zejména ve vztahu k institutu nezbytného přístupu k nemovitosti.
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.