Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  proceduralism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The ludology-narratology dispute has been dismissed and neglected by many researchers. Theorists on both sides of the conflict created theories assimilating the concepts of their opponents. However, in my opinion, Ian Bogost — a scientist not involved in the dispute — has the most interesting solution to the problem. Bogost’s basic concepts — unit operations comparative criticism and procedural rhetoric theory – combine interpretations of game rules with those of narratives. The achievements of Bogost seem less known and appreciated in the Polish game studies. In this article, I will present the basic theories from Bogost’s main books: Unit Operations: An Approach to Videogame Criticism and Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames in the context of ludology versus narratology debate.
EN
Veer Towers (2010) – one of the architectural works designed by Helmut Jahn – is here only a good allegory of the healthy scepticism after 9/11, regarding the new modernism. They may be seen as being iconologically linked with the philosophical question of its founding, namely, with the reasons for its perception as new in relation to the historical modernism. To this end, it is first necessary to consider the concept of the end of modernity. We can argue that, contrary to the claims of Gianni Vattimo, postmodernism can be viewed as a necessary development or return of modernism, which is primarily the mission of the post-Kantian proceduralism of Jürgen Habermas. However, a major role in the proposed strategy for the sustainable inclusion of the Other should be again played by anger, as suggested by Peter Sloterdijk. Must then the new – contortive or loose – modernism veer into another disaster? Will this attempt to control resentiments – such as the anger of the political Islam – force a turn to some timocracy well-known from the past, if proceduralism is in fact only a tortuously delayed voluntarism or quasi-occasionalism?
PL
Veer Towers (2010) – jedno z architektonicznych dzieł zaprojektowanych przez Helmuta Jahna – jest tu tylko dobrą alegorią zdrowego sceptycyzmu po 11 IX 2001 roku, odnoszącym się do problemu nowego modernizmu, który musimy ikonologicznie powiązać z filozoficzną kwestią jego ugruntowania, mianowicie z uzasadnieniem możliwości tego, co w nim nowe w stosunku do modernizmu historycznego. W tym celu należy rozważyć najpierw koncept końca nowoczesności. Jeśli wykażemy, że wbrew Ganniemu Vattimo zaistniały warunki, by ponowoczesność wkomponować w konieczny rozwój czy powrót modernizmu, który byłby głównie misją postkantowskiego proceduralizmu Jürgena Habermasa, to i tak główną rolę Innego ponownie musi tu odegrać gniew, jak zasugerował Peter Sloterdijk. Czy wówczas nowy – skręcający czy poluzowany – modernizm nie zboczy ku kolejnej katastrofie? Czy jego próba zapanowania nad resentymentami – na przykład gniewem politycznego islamu – wymusi skręt ku jakiejś znanej z przeszłości tymokracji, jeśli proceduralizm to faktycznie tylko pokrętnie odwlekany woluntaryzm czy quasi-okazjonalizm?
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.