Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  protection of privacy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Respondent-specific randomized response technique to estimate sensitive proportion

100%
Patra D., Pal S., Chaudhuri A.
Statistics in Transition new series
|
2023
|
vol. 24
|
issue 4
53-70
EN
In estimating the proportion of people bearing a stigmatizing characteristic in a community of people, randomized response techniques are plentifully available in the literature. They are implemented essentially using boxes of similar cards of two distinguishable types. In this paper, we propose a more general procedure using five different types of cards. A respondent-specific randomized response technique is also proposed, in which respondents are allowed to build up the boxes according to their own choices. An immediate objective for this change is to enhance, sense of protection of privacy of the respondents. But as by-products, higher efficiency in terms of actual coverage percentages of confidence intervals and related features are demonstrated by a simulation study, and superior jeopardy levels against divulgence of personal secrecy are also reported to be achievable. AMS subject classification: 62D05.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

How privacy may be protected in optional randomized response surveys

100%
Pal S., Chaudhuri A., Patra D.
Statistics in Transition new series
|
2020
|
vol. 21
|
issue 2
61-87
EN
There are materials in literature about how privacy on stigmatizing features like alcoholism, history of tax-evasion, or testing positive in AIDS-related testing may be partially protected by a proper application of randomized response techniques (RRT). The paper demonstrates what amendments are necessary for this approach while applying optional RRTs covering qualitative characteristics, permitting a sampled respondent either to directly reveal sensitive data or choose a randomized response respectively with complementary probabilities. Only a few standard RRTs are illustrated in the text.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

False paradoxes of the protection of freedom of scientific research

88%
Łętowska E.
Nauka
|
2021
|
issue 2
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Europejski Trybunał Ochrony Praw Człowieka w Strasburgu wobec naruszeń prywatności w mediach Cz. 1. Ewolucja orzecznictwa

51%
Zaremba M.
Studia Medioznawcze
|
2014
|
issue 2 (57)
137-148
PL
Artykuł zawiera omówienie stanowiska Trybunału Europejskiego w kwestii granic prawnej ochrony prywatności przed naruszeniami ze strony mediów. To stanowisko ewoluowało przez lata, a jako kluczowe etapy tego rozwoju wskazano wyroki w sprawach Tammer, von Hannover (1) oraz Axel Springer i von Hannover (nr 2). Test sformułowany w tych dwóch wyrokach stanowi ukoronowanie dorobku orzeczniczego Trybunału dotyczącego relacji art. 8 i art. 10 Konwencji europejskiej.
EN
The article contains a discussion of the stand of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the legal boundaries of protecting privacy from violations on account of media. This standpoint evolved through the years, and as the key stages of this development, verdicts in the cases Tammer, von Hannover (1) and Axel Springer and von Hannover (nr 2) are recalled. The test created in these two verdicts is the crown achievement of the Courts jurisdiction work concerning the relations of article 8 and article 10 of the Convention.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.