Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  province governor
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The author of the opinion claims that heads of provincial sanitary inspections cannot be considered as employees “serving” provincial governor within the meaning of Article 268a of the Code of Administrative Procedure. That interpretation is supported by the wording of Article 19 of the Law on Provincial Governors. According to the author, since the legislature pointed out in a separate provision, in what situations and whom the provincial governor may authorize to exercise his powers, it must be assumed that in other situations such authorization is not permitted. That interpretation is also consistent with the principle of constitutional legality which is the fundamental principle of administrative law. The author gives a conclusion that the province governor cannot authorize provincial health inspectors to conduct, on his behalf, administrative enforcement of non-cash obligations related to preventive vaccination.
EN
Objectives: The subject of the analysis carried out in the paper is the characteristics of supervisory authorities. What is extremely important is that both constitutional authorities and quasi-authorities have the power to conduct supervisory activities, but only in terms of legality. The object of supervision is not only normative acts adopted by commune-level local government bodies, but also other activities carried out by entities that operate at this level of government. Material and methods: The article was prepared on the basis of applicable legal acts of the doctrine views. Results: Because of its brief size, the present paper is not an attempt at a comprehensive presentation of the problem identified in the title. The discussion is limited to a few elements. The paper contains an analysis of selected issues related to the problem of supervision over the activities of commune-level local government. The problem was described by comparing the most important constitutional and non-constitutional authorities appointed for this purpose. Conclusions: The purpose of this paper is to briefly describe the supervision over commune-level local government by both supervisory authorities in the strict meaning of this term and institutions that are considered quasi-supervisory authorities. On the one hand, these are constitutional bodies that operate, among others, in the political sphere (this remark refers to the prime minister and province governors) and, on the other hand, these are supervisory authorities bodies (which in our case supervise the activities of local government units) that exercise their powers by following the criterion of legality (this group also includes regional chambers of accounts).
EN
The aim of the article is to analyze the position and role of the voivode in the public decision-making process of the Second Polish Republic, in the context of creating administrative structures. This is an important issue due to the spectacular and impressive rate of development of the political model of the territorial admini­stration in Poland after the First World War.
EN
In the Second Polish Republic there were new administrative structures. As a result of the unification process, central and territorial administrations were created. Territorial administration was divided into government and self-government administration. Government administration was created by general and special administration. A particular organ in the administration of the Second Polish Republic was the voivod who performed two functions. On the one hand, he was the representative of the Government in the area of the voivodship, on the other hand he was the head of the general administration. The character of the authority of the provincial governor and his office, which assisted him in performing his tasks, was presented on the example of the Provincial Office in Krakow of the 1932.
PL
W artykule podjęto próbę scharakteryzowania ustroju Urzędu Wojewódzkiego Krakowskiego w świetle Statutu organizacyjnego i szczegółowego podziału czynności wprowadzonego zarządzeniem Wojewody Krakowskiego z 21 grudnia 1931 r. Na potrzeby artykułu dokonano również skrótowego przedstawienia struktury aparatu administracji publicznej w II Rzeczypospolitej, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem funkcji wojewody jako przedstawiciela rządu oraz szefa administracji ogólnej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.