Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  przerwanie biegu przedawnienia
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Commentary on the Supreme Court’s Resolution of 29 June 2016, III CZP 29/16

100%
Surowiec M.
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
|
2017
|
vol. 26
|
issue 4
EN
Each enforcement proceeding based on the bank’s enforcement order (beo) does not interrupt the course of limitation of receivables against the buyer of that non-bank claim.
PL
Każde postępowanie egzekucyjne prowadzone na podstawie bankowego tytułu egzekucyjnego (bte) nie przerywa biegu przedawnienia wierzytelności wobec nabywcy tej wierzytelności, niebędącego bankiem.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Glosa do uchwały Trybunału Stanu z 15 maja 2019 r., sygn. akt TSZP 1/17

100%
Radajewski M.
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
|
2023
|
issue 6(76)
427-435
PL
Przedmiotem glosy jest analiza uchwały Trybunału Stanu z 15 maja 2019 r. (sygn. akt TSZP 1/17) rozstrzygającej zagadnienie prawne, którego istota sprowadza się do odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy przerwanie biegu przedawnienia, o którym mowa w art. 23 ustawy o Trybunale Stanu, należy rozumieć w ten sposób, że po wystąpieniu takiego zdarzenia przedawnienie biegnie od nowa. Autor, częściowo polemizując z ustaleniami Trybunału Stanu, wskazuje, że zagadnienia tego nie można rozstrzygnąć przy zastosowaniu metod wykładni językowej i systemowej. Dopiero wykładnia funkcjonalna przemawia za pozytywną odpowiedzią na przedmiotowe pytanie. Tym samym Autor potwierdza słuszność rozstrzygnięcia Trybunału Stanu, jednocześnie wskazując na niedostatki jego uzasadnienia.
EN
The subject of this gloss is an analysis of the resolution of the Tribunal of State of 15 May 2019 (file ref. no. TSZP 1/17) resolving a legal issue, the essence of which boils down to answering the question whether the interruption of the limitation referred to in Art. 23 of the Tribunal of State Act should be understood in such a way that, after the occurrence of such an event, the limitation runs anew. The author, partly polemicising with the findings of the Tribunal of State, points out that this issue cannot be resolved by using the methods of linguistic and systemic interpretation. Only a functional interpretation supports a positive answer to the question under consideration. Thus, the author confirms the correctness of the Tribunal’s decision, while pointing out the deficiencies of its justification.
3

Charakter prawny uznania niewłaściwego przerywającego bieg terminu przedawnienia roszczenia

100%
Szejna S.
Rejent
|
2021
|
issue 6 (362)
24-43
EN
The subject of this publication is to determine the legal nature of the recognition of an incorrect claim resulting in legal effects in the form of interruption of the limitation period. The contentious issue in doctrine and case-law is whether improper recognition leading to the interruption of the limitation period is a declaration of will or knowledge? The analyzed issues are not only theoretical, but above all practical. Namely, adopting the view that improper recognition is a declaration of will, for the effectiveness of a declaration of will in the form of improper recognition interrupting the limitation period it would be necessary for it to meet the conditions for declarations of will (i.e. provisions regarding ability legal transactions; representation of natural and legal persons; forms of legal transactions; defects of declarations of intent). Thus, the provisions on declarations of intent should be applied to such declarations directly. On the other hand, adopting a different position would lead to the application of the incorrect provisions of declarations of intent to this recognition only accordingly (arg. From Article 651 of the Act of 23.04.1964 - Civil Code).
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Aktualne problemy postępowania pojednawczego

80%
Ciesliński M. M.
Studia Iuridica
|
2018
|
vol. 75
19-29
PL
The text refers to the evolution and problems with interpretation of provisions of conciliatory court proceeding in Polish law. Conciliatory court proceeding is regulated by articles 184–186 KPC (The Civil Proceedings Code). Author considers the role of that institution and indicates that although there was not many amendments in above provision of law there was some important court decision relating to this proceeding. Also views of doctrine is still developing. Contemporary conciliatory court proceeding can be used to the all cases that could be terminated by agreement also these that are non-litigious proceedings. It should be noticed that in practice the main role of the conciliatory court proceedings is to interrupt the limitation period. However part of the subjects in civil procedure use the institution contrary to law. They are not interested in agreement but they want only to interrupt the limitation period multiple time to keep their claim. Such way of using conciliatory court proceeding should be treated as abuse of law. Author also shows how important is right classification of conciliatory court proceeding. It can even influence the proper learning process at University. Finally there are presented proposed amendments in law prepared in Government’s Draft of 27th November 2017 relating to the conciliatory court proceeding. Author assumes that conclusion of agreement in conciliatory court proceeding is proper way to finish dispute between the parties. It gives possibility to reduce costs, time and even make people to forget and reconcile animosity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.