Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  public documents
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The opinion presents the subject of the dispute and the judgment in the case C-187/16, the comparison of legal and factual situation related to that case with measures proposed in the governmental Bill as well as assessment on the significance of this judgment for further work on this Bill. The state of law being assessed in the case C-187/16 is comparable to measures included in the governmental Bill. The main difference is that Osterreichische Staatsdruckerei is a private company, whereas the company mentioned in Article 17 of the bill shall be a company wholly owned by the State Treasury. Therefore, in the author’s opinion it is possible to encompass production of given documents by the exemption provided in Article 12 para. 1 of the Directive 2014/24, but under additional conditions. If the Company is not considered an entity covered by this exemption, invoking the need to protect essential security interests of the state would require supplementing the grounds of the Bill by taking into account the position of the Court of Justice in the judgment C-187/16.
EN
This paper offers an analysis of a draft bill on Public Documents together with implementing acts. It focuses, in particular, on the key regulations concerning the list of public documents and their classification, on the process of document specimen design as well as on the exclusivity granted to the producer of blank forms of documents of the first category, examining the impact of the analysed regulations on the system of public document security. The analysis leads to a conclusion that the draft bill has some essential drawbacks which may make the law in question inconsistent with EU law and reduce the level of public document security. These drawbacks have been identified and appropriate corrections have been suggested.
EN
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify gaps and weaknesses in the proposed system of public documents security as well as to formulate corrective actions. Project and methods: The research is based on an analysis of a draft bill on public documents together with implementing acts, the literature review and publicly available data on public documents security. Results: The analysis shows that the draft has some essential weaknesses which may cause its inconsistence with the EU law and reduce the level of public documents security. These weaknesses have been identified and appropriate corrections have been proposed. Conclusions: The implementation of the analyzed legal regulations is necessary as regards public security. However, they need significant corrections. In particular, it is essential to reduce the catalogue of the 1st category of public documents, give authorization for changes in specimens of existing public documents to the Commission on public documents, fill gaps in rules of specimens designing; increase state control over the exclusive producer of blankets of public documents of the 1st category, resign from the option which enables the government to consign manufacturing of blankets of public documents of the 1st category to a producer different that the exclusive.
EN
This paper offers an analysis of a draft bill on Public Documents together with implementing acts. It focuses, in particular, on the key regulations concerning the list of public documents and their classification, on the process of document specimen design as well as on the exclusivity granted to the producer of blank forms of documents of the first category, examining the impact of the analysed regulations on the system of public document security. The analysis leads to a conclusion that the draft bill has some essential drawbacks which may make the law in question inconsistent with EU law and reduce the level of public document security. These drawbacks have been identified and appropriate corrections have been suggested.
PL
Niniejsze opracowanie stanowi analizę projektowanej ustawy o dokumentach publicznych wraz z aktami wykonawczymi. W szczególności skupiono się na kluczowych przepisach, dotyczących wykazu dokumentów publicznych i ich klasyfikacji, procesie opracowywania wzoru dokumentu oraz wyłączności udzielonej wytwórcy blankietów dokumentów pierwszej kategorii, badając wpływ analizowanych regulacji na system bezpieczeństwa dokumentów publicznych. Analiza prowadzi do wniosku, że projekt ustawy obarczony jest szeregiem istotnych mankamentów, które mogą powodować jego niezgodność z prawem UE oraz obniżać poziom bezpieczeństwa dokumentów publicznych. Mankamenty te zostały zidentyfikowane i zaproponowano w odniesieniu do nich konkretne korekty.
EN
The importance of information and the role of digital content is increasing. Public sector information is an important element for digital content products and services, allowing businesses to use their potential. On the European level this issue is regulated by Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, amended in 2013. In the Polish legal system it was implemented initially in the Act on Access to Public Information and then in the Act on the re-use of public sector information. A fundamental change in relation to the previous regulation is the broadening of the scope of the subject matter to include libraries, museums and archives. However, there are more changes, especially the concept of public sector information, which is different from public information. The scope of the project is also different, which currently includes, among others, libraries, museums and archives or the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management. The application of the Act has been restricted to information related to deposits (in certain circumstances), held by museums, libraries or archives due to author’s property rights, as well as copyright and related rights and, contrary to the Directive’s literal wording, industrial property rights belonging to entities other than obliged. Unfortunately, the current controversies concerning re-use of the public documents remain and the new law adds new doubts.
PL
Rośnie znaczenie informacji, a także rola zasobów cyfrowych. Informacja sektora publicznego stanowi istotny element dla produktów i usług związanych z zasobami cyfrowymi, pozwalając przedsiębiorcom na wykorzystywanie swojego potencjału. Na gruncie europejskim kwestię tę reguluje Dyrektywa 2003/98/ WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady, znowelizowana w 2013 r. W polskim systemie prawnym została ona wdrożona początkowo w ustawie o dostępie do informacji publicznej, a następnie w ustawie o ponownym wykorzystywaniu informacji sektora publicznego. Zasadniczą zmianą wobec poprzedniej regulacji jest poszerzenie zakresu podmiotowego o biblioteki, muzea i archiwa. Zmian jednak jest więcej, w tym zwłaszcza pojęcie informacji sektora publicznego, odmienne od informacji publicznej. Odmienny jest również zakres podmiotowy, który obejmuje obecnie m.in. biblioteki, muzea i archiwa, biblioteki naukowe czy Instytut Meteorologii i Gospodarki Wodnej. Stosowanie ustawy ograniczono do informacji dotyczących depozytów (w pewnych okolicznościach), będących w posiadaniu muzeów, bibliotek lub archiwów ze względu na prawa autorskie, jak również prawa autorskie i prawa pokrewne oraz, wbrew dosłownemu brzmieniu dyrektywy, prawa własności przemysłowej należące do podmiotów innych niż podmioty zobowiązane. Niestety, aktualne pozostają dotychczasowe kontrowersje dotyczące ponownego wykorzystywania informacji publicznej, zaś nowa ustawa dodaje nowe wątpliwości.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.