Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Przegląd Sejmowy

Authors help

  1. 2 Ziółkowski M.

Years help

  1. 2 2025

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  publication of judgments
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Opinia prawna na temat skutków prawnych Wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 10 września 2024 r., sygn. akt U 4/24

100%
Ziółkowski M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2025
|
issue 2(187)
177–193
EN
The opinion is predominantly of a legal doctrinal research nature with some normative insights. It analyses the effects of the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal regarding the Pegasus software inquiry committee. The Tribunal declared the legal basis for the functioning of the committee unconstitutional. The opinion discusses the legal effects of the judgment, and it refers to the unconstitutional composition of the Tribunal’s adjudicating bench. It also analyses the interpretation of Article 190(1) and (2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The author argues that the Tribunal’s judgment did not lead to the repeal of the legal bases for the functioning of the committee as it was not published.
2
Content available remote

Opinia prawna na temat skutków prawnych Wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 10 września 2024 r., sygn. akt U 4/24

100%
Ziółkowski M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2025
|
issue 2(187)
EN
The opinion is predominantly of a legal doctrinal research nature with some normative insights. It analyses the effects of the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal regarding the Pegasus software inquiry committee. The Tribunal declared the legal basis for the functioning of the committee unconstitutional. The opinion discusses the legal effects of the judgment, and it refers to the unconstitutional composition of the Tribunal’s adjudicating bench. It also analyses the interpretation of Article 190(1) and (2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The author argues that the Tribunal’s judgment did not lead to the repeal of the legal bases for the functioning of the committee as it was not published.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.