Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  qualitative approach
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Revize kvalitativního přístupu v kontextu rozvoje smíšeného výzkumu

100%
Machovcová K.
Psychologie a její kontexty
|
2017
|
vol. 8
|
issue 2
19–29
EN
Qualitative research has achieved a distinct position in the scientific conduct. Even though it might seem that there is still a dividing line between those focused on qualitative perspective and those preferring quantitative methods, in practice both approaches are often combined. In international literature this trend is reflected in the formulation of so-called third paradigm named mixed-methods. However tensions still remain and the international debate continues. This theoretical study departures from the qualitative research position and shares a reflection on some issues that might come up when trying to combine both qualitative and quantitative methods. In the first part of the following text principles for interpretative qualitative research tradition will be reviewed, theoretically embedded primarily in critical psychology. This philosophical standpoint dwelling in broader critical perspectives invites researchers to focus on complex data that are openly sensitive towards particular context, and analyze even extraordinary details. Qualitative researchers are interested in ambiguous moments, tensions, but also silences and omitted positions. They uncover dichotomies and false differentiation. Some inspiration for conducting qualitative research in interpretative tradition is offered, as well as example of research using both qualitative and quantitative methods with contradictory results is provided. So this parts concludes with stating importance of knowing ones position towards research and its possibilities. It also suggests that the basis for mixing methods is not smooth, even if the respective parties are interested in mutual collaboration and do not leave the option of mixing aside as such. In the next part of the text, overview on current debates on mixing methods resulting in establishing so-called third research paradigm is provided. While qualitative approach to research is typically embedded in interpretative paradigm, quantitative approaches tends to be embedded in positivism and related streams of thought. In order to reconcile possible contradictions some authors prefer to adopt a position called epistemological pragmatism. This enables to leave the discussion on inherent tensions between qualitative and quantitative approach based on epistemological differences and utilize respective methods to be able to fully engage their benefits and overcome disadvantages of each of them. On the other hand other authors acknowledge the possible epistemological conflicts and tensions and suggest to work with and through them, in the tradition described as dialectic pluralism. In this sense it seems difficult to use any method as just method, without the epistemological position that it might evoke. Overall the aim of the study is to introduce international debates evolving around theoretical background of research conduct with focus on interpretative qualitative paradigm and mixed methods. Thus the text can be inspiration and supplement for current debates in the Czech context.
2
Content available remote

Akulturace expatriotů v českém prostředí: (vyšší manažeři versus "český lid")

88%
Gärtner M., Drbohlav D.
Český lid: etnologický časopis (Český lid: Ethnological journal)
|
2012
|
vol. 99
|
issue 4
385-406
EN
Acculturation of expatriate executive managers was examined in the sample of 16 sojourners transferring managerial know-how to companies in Czechia, using a structured longitudinal interview survey including in depth personal interviews. The interviews were conducted six and eighteen months after the arrival of respondents in Czechia. The respondents were contacted as they became available during the period 2006 to 2010. The results indicate that acculturation of sojourners in Czechia proceeded, as expected according to the international literature, broadly in line with the Hofstede’s acculturation “U“ curve (Hofstede 1997). The qualitative analysis points to a number of problems, the sojourners had to deal with during their acculturation including: dependence on communication in English, while recognising potential advantages associated with the knowledge of Czech language, cultural distance - particularly the uncertainty arising from the inability to correctly predict Czech behaviour, lack of openness limiting the Czech ability to form a broader world view, lack of mutual respect between the Czech co-workers, a degree of Czech xenophobia and underestimation of certain predictors of successful acculturation such as social engagement with the Czech hosts. Research also points to a number of helpful coping strategies.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Od podejścia jakościowego do ilościowego. Droga badaczek w projektowaniu badań mieszanych

63%
Chmielińska A., Modrzejewska-Świgulska M.
Kultura i Edukacja
|
2022
|
issue 3(137)
63-80
PL
Artykuł zawiera opis procesu tworzenia projektu badań w strategii mieszanej. Autorki prezentują swoją drogę przejścia od metod jakościowych do ilościowych oraz swój pomysł ich twórczej integracji. Projekt badawczy opisany jest nie tylko od strony metodologicznej, ale zawiera także autorską koncepcję teoretyczną w postaci Modelu re-decyzji życiowych. Autorki podejmują wątki przełomowych zmian życiowych w kontekście samorealizacji, z punktu widzenia szeroko rozumianej psychologii humanistycznej, oraz tego, jak połączenie różnych typów danych sprzyja bardziej efektywnemu badaniu danego zjawiska. Intencją autorek jest inspirowanie do przełamywania własnych schematów naukowych oraz ukazanie wartościowości współpracy i zespołowości.
EN
The article describes the process of designing a mixed strategy – from the qualitative approach to the quantitative approach. Important in this approach is the idea of integrating both research strategies, which is supposed to foster more effective cognition of the studied phenomenon. The authors describe the stages of the conducted qualitative research (theoretical assumptions, methods of collecting and analyzing empirical data) and the planned stages of quantitative research aimed at constructing a psychometric tool based on the cognitive effects of qualitative research. The article presents the results of qualitative research (the first stage of the mixed strategy) – the Model of Life Re-Decisions (four stages of self-relation) and Biographical Orders. The model depicts breakthrough life changes in the context of self-realization, from the perspective of broad humanistic psychology. The authors’ intention is to draw attention to the value of teamwork and to inspire readers to break through research patterns (searching for new research solutions).
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Praktyki badawcze obecne w badaniach nad procesami społeczno-kulturowego uczenia się dorosłych. Ujęcie krytyczne

63%
Jurgiel A.
Edukacja Dorosłych
|
2011
|
issue 2(65)
93-98
PL
Autorka przedstawia założenia badań biograficznych jako badań interpretatywnych w nawiązaniu do sposobu ich uprawiania we współczesnej andragogice. Twierdzi, iż stały się one popularne, ze względu na powszechne przekonanie, że nie trzeba posiadać wyrafinowanych kompetencji, by je uprawiać. Tymczasem zidentyfikowane przez Autorkę praktyki badawcze, które nazywa: wiernością procedurze, wyczarowywaniem wyników badań czy traktowaniem badań biograficznych jako dyskursywnych wymagają zaawansowanej wiedzy dotyczącej epistemologii oraz wysokiej świadomości metodologicznej.
EN
The author shows assumptions of biographical research as interpretative research with reference to the way it is conducted in modern andragogy. She states that it attracted general attention due to the popular belief that this kind of research does not require sophisticated competence. Meanwhile, research practices identified by the author, which she calls – faithfulness to the procedure, conjuring up research results or treating biographical research as discursive ones requires specialist knowledge of epistemology, as well as increased methodological awareness.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Specyfika psychologicznej interpretacji tekstu pisanego: przegląd badań

51%
Żurko M.
Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja
|
2016
|
vol. 19
|
issue 3(75)
167-179
EN
This article reviews some selected psychological studies, the source of which are written texts, including personal documents. The test procedures and its results were described in two ways: the quantitative and the qualitative one. The results of the quantitative research were selected depending on their use for the text interpretation, with the focus on the narrator (the relationship between the form of expression and a mental state or permanent mental disposition). The research on fixing meanings of personal identity (narrative or dialogue), or the meaning of life, is set as the qualitative approach. The starting point is a classic biographical study of Ch. Buehler, then a psychological study based on diaries from the ghetto, then some selected results of over 20-years’ study on the narrative identity of D. McAdams and finally the study using H. Hermans’s Dialogical Self Theory in clinical psychology.
PL
W artykule dokonano przeglądu wybranych badań psychologicznych, w których jako źródło danych wykorzystano teksty pisane, w tym dokumenty osobiste. Scharakteryzowane zostały procedury badawcze i rezultaty w ramach dwóch podejść: ilościowego i jakościowego. Rezultaty badań ilościowych zostały wybrane pod kątem ich przydatności dla interpretacji tekstu (zależności między formą wypowiedzi a stanem psychicznym lub trwałą dyspozycją psychiczną) ukierunkowanej na osobę narratora. W ramach podejścia jakościowego przedstawione zostały badania dotyczące ustalania znaczeń (sensów) podmiotowych konstytuujących tożsamość osobistą (narracyjną lub dialogową) lub sens życia. Punktem wyjścia są klasyczne badania biograficzne Ch. Buehler, następnie omówione są psychologiczne badania dzienników z getta, wybrane strategie i ustalenia w ramach ponad 20-letnich badań nad tożsamością narracyjną w ujęciu D. McAdamsa oraz badanie wykorzystujące teorię dialogowego Ja H. Hermansa w klinicznej psychologii stosowanej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.