Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  reglamentacja administracyjna
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Interes prawny w postępowaniu administracyjnym w sprawie o cofnięcie zezwolenia na sprzedaż napojów alkoholowych przeznaczonych do spożycia w miejscu lub poza miejscem sprzedaży na podstawie art. 18 ust. 10 pkt 3 ustawy o wychowaniu w trzeźwości i przeciwdziałaniu alkoholizmowi

100%
Sienkiewicz T.
Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
|
2011
|
vol. 7
|
issue 1 Prawo
127-167
EN
This paper seeks to answer the question: do those who live in the vicinity of alcoholic beverages trade have a legal interest in a trial for the withdrawal of the concession on this business, or only factual interest? Therefore can they be a party of this trial according to art. 28 of the Code of administrative trial, or not? This regulation reads: “a party can be anyone whose legal interest or duty concerns the trial, or who demands that the institution should do something because of their legal interest or duty.” In order to show this problem, the author used an administrative case from the Town Council of Lublin in which the concept “legal interest” was one of the key problems that affected the whole trial. It has been indicated that in the case of the administrative police the meaning of “legal interest” can be broader than in the situation of administrative rationing. The author indicates the influence of various ways to define the scope of the concept of “legal interest” on the withdrawal of the concession of the sale of alcoholic beverages to be drunk at the point of purchase or outside on the basis of art. 18 law 10 point 3 of the law of education for temperance and prevention of alcoholism. This regulation determines that the concession on selling alcoholic beverages is withdrawn in the case of “recurrent at least twice within six months in the place of sale or in its close vicinity, disturbance of public order in relation to the sale of alcoholic beverages because of a given outlet, when this outlet does not inform the organs called to defend the public order”. Taking into consideration the goal of the administrative police the author is of the opinion that private interest in the administrative code in the case for the withdrawal of the concession on the sale of alcoholic beverages destined to be drunk at the point of sale or outside on the basis of art. 18 law 10 point 3 of the above law will also have those persons who live nearby the outlet. Their private interest may result not only and exclusively from the material administrative law, but also from the norms of universal law. Therefore, having indicated private interest or duty, they will be able to take part in this procedure as a party according to art. 28 k.p.a.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Interes prawny w postępowaniu administracyjnym w sprawie o cofnięcie zezwolenia na sprzedaż napojów alkoholowych przeznaczonych do spożycia w miejscu lub poza miejscem sprzedaży na podstawie art. 18 ust. 10 pkt 3 ustawy o wychowaniu w trzeźwości i przeciwdziałaniu alkoholizmowi

100%
Sienkiewicz T.
Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
|
2011
|
vol. 7
|
issue 1
127-167
EN
This paper seeks to answer the question: do those who live in the vicinity of alcoholic beverages trade have a legal interest in a trial for the withdrawal of the concession on this business, or only factual interest? Therefore can they be a party of this trial according to art. 28 of the Code of administrative trial, or not? This regulation reads: “a party can be anyone whose legal interest or duty concerns the trial, or who demands that the institution should do something because of their legal interest or duty.” In order to show this problem, the author used an administrative case from the Town Council of Lublin in which the concept “legal interest” was one of the key problems that affected the whole trial. It has been indicated that in the case of the administrative police the meaning of “legal interest” can be broader than in the situation of administrative rationing. The author indicates the influence of various ways to define the scope of the concept of “legal interest” on the withdrawal of the concession of the sale of alcoholic beverages to be drunk at the point of purchase or outside on the basis of art. 18 law 10 point 3 of the law of education for temperance and prevention of alcoholism. This regulation determines that the concession on selling alcoholic beverages is withdrawn in the case of “recurrent at least twice within six months in the place of sale or in its close vicinity, disturbance of public order in relation to the sale of alcoholic beverages because of a given outlet, when this outlet does not inform the organs called to defend the public order”. Taking into consideration the goal of the administrative police the author is of the opinion that private interest in the administrative code in the case for the withdrawal of the concession on the sale of alcoholic beverages destined to be drunk at the point of sale or outside on the basis of art. 18 law 10 point 3 of the above law will also have those persons who live nearby the outlet. Their private interest may result not only and exclusively from the material administrative law, but also from the norms of universal law. Therefore, having indicated private interest or duty, they will be able to take part in this procedure as a party according to art. 28 k.p.a.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rozważania nad istnieniem i istotą wolności zabudowy – głos w dyskusji

80%
Ostrowska A.
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio G (Ius)
|
2017
|
vol. 64
|
issue 1
EN
The idea of the freedom of construction encompasses this value as a derivative of the property right and finds its guarantees in the regulations of the Constitution. In the doctrine as well as in the judgements of the Polish Constitutional Court and administrative courts, this kind of freedom occurs traditionally in two aspects: from the perspective of a subject – as a fundamental rule in the process of investment and from the perspective of an object – as a right to construct. Contemporary extensive system of administrative regulation in the construction law with the construction permit as a central legal measure, causes for thought regarding the existence and the essence of the freedom of construction, including its role in the process of making and applying the law as well as in the system of the judicial control of the public administration. This issue is analysed from the perspective of the universal problem, which is the relation between the freedom of the individual and the law.
PL
Klasyczna koncepcja wolności budowlanej ujmuje tę wartość jako pochodną prawa własności nieruchomości, a jej gwarancji upatruje w przepisach Konstytucji. W polskiej doktrynie i orzecznictwie sądowym z zakresu prawa administracyjnego wolność ta występuje tradycyjnie w dwóch aspektach: przedmiotowym (jako zasada prawa) oraz podmiotowym (jako publiczne prawo podmiotowe). Współczesny rozbudowany system reglamentacji w prawie budowlanym, w którym centralną instytucją nadal pozostaje pozwolenie na budowę, skłania do refleksji nad istnieniem i istotą wolności budowlanej, w tym jej rolą w procesie stanowienia i stosowania prawa, a także sądowej kontroli administracji publicznej. Problem ten jest ukazany z perspektywy szerszego zagadnienia, jakim jest relacja pomiędzy wolnością jednostki a prawem.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.