Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  relatives
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Purpose: Breast self-examination (BSE) is a critical technique in early detection of breast diseases, especially cancer. This quasi-experimental study was performed to evaluate the effects of BSE training on health beliefs and practices among relatives of nursing students. Materials and methods: The study sample consisted of 133 relatives of nursing students. After training student nurses about BSE, they were requested to train their relatives regarding BSE. The data were collected before and 6 months after BSE training. Results: It was determined that 39.1% (n=52) of women performed BSE before the training and 87.2% (n=116) of them after the training and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.0001). Sensitivity perception (Z=-2.915, p=0.004), benefit perception (Z=-4.888, p=0.0001) and confidence perception (Z=-2.503, p=0.012) of women significantly increased and disability perception (Z=-8.576, p=0.0001) decreased significantly after the training. Conclusions: In conclusion, the BSE training given by nursing students to their relatives enhanced health beliefs and practices of the participants.
EN
The aim of this article is to present the results of empirical research on the existence and distribution of kinship in the social networks of women and men in three groups: young adults, middle-aged adults, and younger seniors. The research also included the question of the respondents’ perception of kinhip. The study was conducted in 2021 on a sample of 109 adult persons aged 20–69. The analysis revealed that the morphology of the inner circles of the social network is primarily determined by two variables, namely stage of life and gender, and not by the kins’ biographical attainability. Family life is organized and centered around the woman and her first-, second-, and third-degree relatives. Bonds with relatives are seen mainly as a source of benefits (permanence, support, open communication, norms, values, and identity) rather than as a space of opression.
PL
Artykuł prezentuje wyniki badań empirycznych na temat obecności krewnych w sieciach społecznych kobiet i mężczyzn w trzech fazach życia: wczesnego dorosłego, dorosłego w średnim wieku i młodszego seniora oraz sposobów postrzegania więzi z krewnymi. Badania były prowadzone w 2021 roku na próbie 109 osób w wieku 20–69 lat. Analiza pokazała, że morfologia wewnętrznych kręgów sieci społecznej jest uzależniona od płci oraz fazy życia, nie od biograficznej dostępności krewnych. Życie rodzinne jest zorganizowane i skupione wokół kobiet i krewnych pochodzących ze strony matki. Więzi z krewnymi są postrzegane raczej jako źródło zasobów, trwałości, wsparcia, otwartości komunikacyjnej, norm, wartości i tożsamości, niż jako przestrzeń opresji.
EN
Parental responsibility is a key concept of Czech Family Law. The Civil Code regulates the rules for administration of parental responsibility in harmony with the best interests of the child and his or her welfare and participations rights. As parental responsibility is vested with the legal parents of the child, it cannot be wholly “delegated” to other people (relatives, private personal caregivers, domestic workers etc.). However, the parents are free to conclude “contract for temporal personal care of their child”, which is not regulated as a typical contract by the Civil Code. Such a contract can be classified under “contracts for work” or “mandate copntract”. When relatives, private personal caregiver or domestic workers (in short “obligated party” or “obligor”) do not fulfil the rights and duties established by the contract then they are legally responsible for the wrong fulfilment.
EN
The paper describes the concept of marriage and divorce, as presented in the Model Family Code (the MFC), and compares it to the provisions of the Polish Family Law. The MFC was developed on the basis of research carried out by the Commission on European Family Law (CEFL) and focuses on the very essential ideas of the future regulation of Family Law. As per Article 1.1 of the MFC, the main institution is partnership, which includes both marriages and non-marital relationships, provided that they have lasted more than three years or that the partners have a common child or that one of the partners has made substantial contributions to the relationship or in the sole interest of the other partner. This approach is not consistent with the Polish legal system, because of the division between private life and family life. Family life is a social situation between spouses or relatives that is brought about exclusively by coital interactions between spouses or partners or by adoption that eventually result in maternity, paternity and kinship between the relatives. On the other hand, private life is a social situation brought about by various personal interactions that only result in personal relations. The scope of private life is broader and it always includes family life. The two fundamental categories pertinent to this division are sexual interactions, defined as a broad group of personal behaviours, and coital interactions (conjugal interactions), defined exclusively as behaviours between two adult persons of different sex. The existence of coital interactions constitutes a different and only one kind of the social reality (social group), which is open for maternity, paternity and kinship between the relatives. In contrast to Article 1.1 of the MFC, a conjugal union between woman and man, who have not entered into marriage, is treated as concubinage. It has a private character only, but it can be translated into a family situation, because of maternity and paternity connected with the delivery of a common child of the partners. It is indispensable to divide all private phenomena into two groups: the transformable phenomena and the non-transformable phenomena. If a concubinage is transformed into family, it receives, as a family, a full-scale protection offered by the state. However, a large group of sexual interactions does not have a conjugal character at all; these are recognised as being non-transformable and exclusively private phenomena. Certain other social unions that do not involve any sexual bonds also have a non-transformable nature. The regulation of divorce is a controversial one, because of the absence of any positive substantial premise for a decree of divorce and the absence of any negative premises for divorce (like welfare of the child). What is more, the mandatory ‘period of six months’ intended for reflection (Article 1.10 of the MFC) seems to be rather old-fashioned.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.